Posted on 05/30/2021 3:44:13 AM PDT by ransomnote
German scientists have found out how the broken parts of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccines branded as Covishield in India mutate to trigger blood clots in recipients. Scientists say the vaccine is sent into the cell nucleus instead of surrounding fluid, where parts of it break off and create mutated versions of themselves. The mutated versions then enter the body and trigger the blood clots.
Two vaccines, one manufactured by Oxford-AstraZeneca branded as Covishield in India and the other by Johnson & Johnson, have been linked to blood clotting disorders, particularly among women under the age of 50.
Earlier, German scientists found the exact 2 step process how the COVID-19 vaccine causes blood clots in recipients. They describe a series of events that has to happen in the body before the vaccines create these large clots.
Now, researchers at Goethe-University of Frankfurt and Ulm University, in Helmholtz, have found the problem which they say lies in the adenovirus vector — a common cold virus used so both vaccines can enter the body.
Scientists believe that in some people, the immune system sees the vaccine as a threat and over-produces antibodies to fight it. These lead to the formation of clumps in the blood, which can become deadly if the clots move towards vital organs and cut off supply.
The complication spooked many countries to suspend or ban these vaccines.
German ministers claimed the jab didn’t work at all old in people and France’s Emmanuel Macron called it ‘quasi-effective’ vaccine.
Dr Rolf Marschalek, a biochemistry professor at Goethe University in Germany, told the Financial Times that blood clots may be caused by the way vaccine enters the body.
Dr Marschalek suggests that the vaccine is delivered to the nucleus of the cell – a blob of DNA in the middle – rather than to the fluid around it that acts as a protein factory.
Bits of coronavirus proteins that get inside the nucleus can break up and the unusual fragments then get expelled out into the bloodstream, where they can trigger clotting in people, Dr Marschalek said.
The first clots to alarm people were ones appearing in veins near the brains of younger adults in a condition called CSVT (cerebral sinus venous thrombosis).
Another shocking study has revealed the terrifying dangers of even the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines inducing prion-based disease causing your brain to degenerate progressively.
The mRNA vaccine induced prions may cause neurodegenerative diseases because long-term memories are maintained by prion-like proteins. The study concluded that mRNA based vaccine may also cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases in the vaccine recipients.
Meanwhile, Nobel Prize winner French Virologist Prof. Luc Montagnier in an interview has made a startling claim that the COVID-19 vaccines itself are creating variants.
He said that epidemiologists know but are “silent” about the phenomenon, known as “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement” (ADE).
For extensively exposing the blood clots controversy, GreatGameIndia is being actively targeted by the NATO propaganda arm Atlantic Council which operates the web of fact-checkers.
Read the study by German scientists below:
[ransomnote: embedded PDF at link]
They have been working on MRNA technology for years, and as I understand it, no prior MRNA vaccine has made it to human trials because the animal tests have not been successful. But they assure us that they have improved the technology, so now there's nothing to worry about.
That's just like socialists. When confronted with socialism's many past failures, they will assure us that the next time it's tried, it will work and deliver paradise on earth.
Dr Marschalek suggests that the vaccine is delivered to the nucleus of the cell – a blob of DNA in the middle – rather than to the fluid around it that acts as a protein factory.
Does the doctor not know that the viral vector vaccines are DESIGNED to enter the cell nucleus rather than the cytoplasm only as the less intrusive mRNA vaccines do?
More likely, the author has no business writing a medical piece.
It’s just a few complications. It’s just a few deaths. These may be the next equivocations.
“No vaccine is without risks. It’s up to you, the patient, to decide if you want to accept those risks. I had the Moderna vaccine and I’m happy I did.”
The question is will you be happy in 2 years, 4, 6.
The big mystery about them is long term unintended consequences.
************************************************************
Well, at least YOUR CURRENT “long term” isn’t as long as AOC’s climate change predicted disaster in, what is it now, 9 years? I remember when the STRANGE BREW CREW’S (SBC’s) predicted long term consequences were to arrive 6 months after vaccination. I guess SBC predictions are MUTABLE as reality disproves earlier predictions.
Maybe you jihadists can start using PEER REVIEWED predictions.
No vaccine for me....never,ever... I’ll take my 98.5% survival chance of this silly virus....if I die from it,well boo freaking hoo....no flowers please.
That is more than enough
No jab for me. LOL
So, basically they’re just learning about this experimental vaccine which they have now injected in millions of Guinea pigs. Well this certainly is comforting.
Exactly on point!
It seems that many self righteous individuals can’t rationalize the following statements, to make a sound decision:
1. Not taking an experimental “vaccine”, possibly contract an illness with a 99+% recovery rate.
2. Take an experimental “vaccine”, no long term testing performed and unknown, potentially life altering side effects.
It really doesn’t appear to be an overly complicated decision, does it?
Ping!
I would add there is an unsettling hostile political backdrop to the whole event, both external and internal.
Make that your #29; more coffee over here!
“Notice how its gone from ‘safe and effective’ to ‘no vaccine is without risks’?
Interesting. The evolution of the collective mind continues. If this keep up, we will achieve herd intelligence.”
____________________________________
EXACTLY
Yeah, I doubt the author of that article understands what is being theorized by the authors of the study.
Basically, what the study proposes is that unlike the mRNA vaccines, the adenovirus vector vaccines go through processes in the nucleus that produce variants of the spike protein. The spike proteins should anchor to the cell membrane of the cells producing them which is what happens with the spike proteins produced by the mRNA vaccines. But with the adenovirus vaccines, some of the spike protein variants lack the means to anchor to the cell membrane and pass into the bloodstream and may attach to endothelial cells causing inflammation that may result in clotting. The likelihood of that happening is greater with AstraZeneca than with J & J, but will occur with both by the mechanism proposed by the authors of the study.
FWIW, an author of the study replied(referencing AstraZeneca) to a question someone asked about long term problems in the comments attached to the study. He stiil thinks it’s a good vaccine.:
George Peterson
commented on 28 May, 2021
Are there any long term harmful effects to your findings? In other words, if a person who receives an adenovirus vaccine does not have a blood clot event, is there any other long term concerns of this spike splicing happening?
REPLY
Report
View 1 reply
Rolf Marschalek
replied on 28 May, 2021
Based on the present data, I would say no. If the first shot didnt caused any problem, the second will be tolerated as well. Most severe side effects were observed between 4-16 days after first vaccination. Knowing this, it will be much easier to counteract these severe side effects in the future. I still think that this vaccine is a good vaccine, but could be made much better if certain things has been changed.
Did it work?
Would you feel safe if a dying COVID patient coughed in you maskless face?
I wish you good health in the future. This unapproved gene therapy could wreak havoc down the road. I hope for everyone that took these shots that their future health is not compromised.
Just got to thinking...
When you’re giving an intramuscular injection, how dumb do you have to be not to know you’ll need a longer needle to get through a thicker layer of fat...?
Agreed.
I had read that study too, and the blame likely belongs with the columnist’s lack of understanding.
J&J and AstraZeneca essentially dusted off a page from the gene therapy handbook and chose the adenovirus as the vector so as not to make permanent changes to DNA.
The mRNA method always seemed the cleaner, safer way to express the desired protein temporarily. Simpler with one less process where error can occur as appears to be the case, though rarely with the J&J method.
Some of you, members of Free Republic may be interested in reading DAEGLE FORECAST PART 1 and DAEGLE PREDICTIONS PART 2 it is quite detailed and predicts a considerable reduction of the population, that is if you happen to have an inquisitive mind. I have a hunch that there is a connection with the current vaccine craze and what may take place down the road. I refrained from posting these articles as they are very long and go into details, but no doubt they are available if you search for them on the internet.
Mine certainly does. My immune system even shared that info with my brain to which my brain replied, no worries, I have no plan to get the jab. My immune system gave a sigh of relief and said thank you. My brain said; thanks for not letting us get a cold or flu in 5 years. My immune system and brain are like best buds now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.