Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE SECESSION REBELLION: Martial Law Proclaimed at Alexandria; Sentries Fired Upon on Saturday Night; FIVE DAYS WITH THE REBELS (5/27/1861)
New York Times archives – Times Machine ^ | 5/27/1861

Posted on 05/27/2021 5:31:11 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson

SPECIAL DISPATCH FROM WASHINGTON.

WASHINGTON, Sunday, May 26.

For a wonder, we hare gone through twentyfour hours without any extraordinary excitement. Movements of troops are constantly going on, but it is only the details or filling in of the grind movement of Thursday night.

Every non-resident of the city who could command a vehicle has visited the captured city of Alexandria. All concur in representing the inhabitants as sullen and disaffected -- the only smiling faces seen being those of the "peculiar institution."

All along the river line or front, the troops are engaged in throwing up works. There are several forts being constructed, some of large dimensions.

The Sixty-ninth has thrown up a bank one mile long and seven feet high.

Of course we have a fresh rumor every hour. Now it is a grand attack along the entire line; next it is a skirmish with the outposts; and then there is no enemy within fifteen miles.

SEIZURE OF ARMS IN ALEXANDRIA.

The troops in Alexandria last night seized two hundred and fifty revolvers, and six hundred rounds of ammunition, all of which were in the possession of some Secessionists, and were duly confiscated.

MARTIAL LAW IN ALEXANDRIA.

Col. WILCOX has declared Martial Law in the city and vicinity.

The last Regiment of New-Jersey troops left this evening for Alexandria, the Band playing "Hall Columbia."

Three spies were arrested yesterday, and one last night.

The pickets of Col. WILCOX's command were fired upon last night by the rebel troops, and one of the balls passed through a soldier's hair, slightly grazing his head. Col. WILCOX immediately ordered the men to form, and they slept on their arms all night.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: civilwar
Free Republic University, Department of History presents U.S. History, 1855-1860: Seminar and Discussion Forum
The American Civil War, as seen through news reports of the time and later historical accounts

First session: November 21, 2015. Last date to add: Sometime in the future.
Reading: Self-assigned. Recommendations made and welcomed.

Posting history, in reverse order

https://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:homerjsimpson/index?tab=articles

To add this class to or drop it from your schedule notify Admissions and Records (Attn: Homer_J_Simpson) by reply or freepmail.

Link to previous New York Times thread

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3962531/posts

1 posted on 05/27/2021 5:31:11 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
1

0527-nytimesa

2

0527-nytimesb

3

0527-nytimesc

4

0527-nytimesd

5

0527-nytimese

6

0527-nytimesf

7

0527-nytimesg

2 posted on 05/27/2021 5:32:04 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation gets the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chajin; henkster; CougarGA7; BroJoeK; central_va; Larry Lucido; wagglebee; Colonel_Flagg; Amagi; ...
The Secession Rebellion: Martial Law Proclaimed at Alexandria– 2-3
Obsequies of Col Ellsworth – 3
Five Days with the Rebels: The Experience of Our Special Correspondent, who was Arrested at Harper’s Ferry as a Spy – 3-5
Gen. Pillow’s Movements – 5
A Wise Step at the Right Time – 5
Editorial: The Error in the Foreign View of the Contest – 5-6
Editorial: The Army in Virginia – 6
Editorial: The Future of the South – 6-7
Slaves Contraband of War – 7
Editorial: Our Present Relations with Brazil – 7
Respect to Col Ellsworth in Kentucky – 7
3 posted on 05/27/2021 5:33:01 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation gets the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson; x; DiogenesLamp; jeffersondem; Bull Snipe
"Slaves Contraband of War"

This is the first mention I've seen of "Beast" Butler's "Contrabands of War".
It will not be the last and could become a key to Union victory.

4 posted on 05/27/2021 7:43:05 AM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
"Editorial: The Future of the South – 6-7"

Here we see a quote from a Georgia newspaper expressing some of Confederates' fondest fantasies about "unlimited expansion southward".
It shows that the Golden Circle was part of their plan from Day One.

5 posted on 05/27/2021 8:03:11 AM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

“This is the first mention I’ve seen of “Beast” Butler’s “Contrabands of War”.

He first brought it to Gen. Scott’s (and our own) attention in a May 24 memo.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3960175/posts#41


6 posted on 05/27/2021 8:10:09 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation gets the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK; Homer_J_Simpson; x; DiogenesLamp; Bull Snipe
“This is the first mention I've seen of “Beast” Butler's “Contrabands of War”.”

This phrasing by Butler tends to support the later observation by the London Spectator:

“The government liberates the enemy's slaves as it would the enemy's cattle, simply to weaken them in the . . . conflict. . . . The principle is not that a human being cannot justly own another, but that he cannot own him unless he is loyal to the United States.”

7 posted on 05/27/2021 8:25:50 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem

Your Point?


8 posted on 05/27/2021 8:30:54 AM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bull Snipe; BroJoeK; Homer_J_Simpson; x; DiogenesLamp

“Your Point?”

My point was the the phrasing by General Butler supported the later observation by the London Spectator.


9 posted on 05/27/2021 9:08:58 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem
jeffersondem quoting London Spectator: "The principle is not that a human being cannot justly own another, but that he cannot own him unless he is loyal to the United States.”

Indeed, as jeffersondem so gleefully points out, the Constitution "enshrined" slavery for loyal States.
But for States at war against the United States, laws of war allowed US officials to declare "contraband of war" and so they did, thus simultaneously moving to defeat the rebellion and accomplish their long term moral goals.

So it was a win-win for the Union, for the Confederacy it was a stake in the heart.

10 posted on 05/28/2021 3:28:01 AM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson; jeffersondem; Bull Snipe; DiogenesLamp
Homer on Butler's "Contraband of War": "He first brought it to Gen. Scott’s (and our own) attention in a May 24 memo."

Confirming that Union actions against slavery began in the war's opening days, and not as some afterthought two years down the road.

11 posted on 05/28/2021 3:50:59 AM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK; Homer_J_Simpson; Bull Snipe; DiogenesLamp; x
“. . . and so they (Lincoln officials) did, thus simultaneously moving to defeat the rebellion and accomplish their long term moral goals.”

In his “House Divided” speech Lincoln expressed the expectation that one way or the other constitutional slavery would end.

Everyone, North and South, knew Lincoln would not likely have the votes to end constitutional slavery peacefully in his lifetime using the amendment process.

However, if he could parlay 39 percent of the popular vote into a presidency; if he could gain control of the military he could levy war against the states and violently overthrow constitutional slavery. And the Constitution.

First he would need a pretext for war. This he found using the navy in the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.

I meant to say, the Fort Sumter Incident.

12 posted on 05/28/2021 11:16:09 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem; Homer_J_Simpson; Bull Snipe; DiogenesLamp; x
jeffersondem: "First he would need a pretext for war.
This he found using the navy in the Gulf of Tonkin Incident.
I meant to say, the Fort Sumter Incident."

Fort Sumter was a "pretext" only in the same sense that, for examples, Pearl Harbor and 9/11 were "pretexts".
All had the effects of convincing all Americans that war had begun in earnest.

Toombs was right, Davis was wrong.
13 posted on 05/28/2021 11:52:43 AM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK; Homer_J_Simpson; Bull Snipe; DiogenesLamp; x
“Fort Sumter was a “pretext” only in the same sense that, for examples, Pearl Harbor and 9/11 were “pretexts”.”

To compare Fort Sumter - no battle deaths - to Pearl Harbor or September 11 is inapt and unapt.

It is also inept.

14 posted on 05/28/2021 6:09:51 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jeffersondem; Homer_J_Simpson; Bull Snipe; DiogenesLamp; x
jeffersondem: "To compare Fort Sumter - no battle deaths - to Pearl Harbor or September 11 is inapt and unapt."

So, the analogy would be totally apt with you, you'd have no problems comparing Fort Sumter to Pearl Harbor if... if... if only Maj. Anderson had put up more of a fight, if only he'd held out longer, killed more Confederates, got more of his own troops killed, right?
So, how many Union dead people would you need to see?
Would 7% Union casualties be enough to convince you the battle was serious enough to rank with Pearl Harbors' 7% casualties?

Regardless... Fort Sumter had the same effect, just as Toombs had correctly predicted.
And that's a fact, regardless of how apt you consider it.

And Jefferson Davis' excuse for ignoring Toombs' advice was?

15 posted on 05/28/2021 11:45:12 PM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK; Homer_J_Simpson; Bull Snipe; DiogenesLamp; x
“Regardless... Fort Sumter had the same effect, just as Toombs had correctly predicted.”

Toombs?

I guess you are ready to move the discussion to anything other than the cat you let out of the bag in post 10 when you acknowledged Lincoln and his officials used war to “accomplish their long term ‘moral’ goals”, i.e. the violent overthrow of constitutional slavery.

And the constitution.

16 posted on 05/29/2021 7:06:53 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson