Note that 270 deaths following Covid vaccines published to VAERS are 'unknown age' and are not shown in the table.
Posted on 05/24/2021 2:18:06 PM PDT by ransomnote
I began writing a reply to a post in the forum and decided to make it a standalone thread given both the level of effort expended and the frequency I encounter the issue at hand.
FReeper assertion seen in the forum: There are convincing analyses showing that VAERS is only reporting 1/4 of events (including deaths). That’s still almost 4,000 deaths that should be in VAERS, essentially matching what we see in VAERS. If those assumptions are true, it is entirely coincidental deaths. If you take issue with an assumption please specific.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
51% of events published to VAERS [5/21 data] were reported during December and January. 36 million doses of the Covid 'vaccines' were administered during those 51 days.
Data analyst Albert Benevenidos (sp) used the ratios of adverse event categories (hospitalizations, deaths, office vists etc.) from those records to estimate number of adverse events reported, but not published, by the CDC during the administration of an additional 230 million doses from February to May.
Using that method, Benvidos estimates there have actually been 12,200 deaths and over 1 million adverse events reported to the CDC, most of which have not been published. That's close to your 14K.
However, based on a Harvard study which found only about 1% of actual events are ever reported to the CDC, he adjusted that figure. Instead of multiplying by 100 to estimate total numbers of actual post vaccine deaths, he cut that factor to be extremely conservative, as if half of all Covid deaths are reported to VAERS, an impossibly low ratio.
Assuming 1/2 of all post 'vaccine' deaths were being reported to the CDC , the total adjusted estimate for adverse events following Covid 'vaccination' is 610,000 deaths and 50 million adverse events, according to Benevenidos' analysis.
The CDC is not making much of an effort to monitor safety during the purported Covid 'pandemic' or else it would be vigilant in updating and maintaining VAERS promptly. To clear the air, the CDC can easily refute these numbers by uploading the reports it has received but not published.
Also, there are numerous reports of doctors and patients not able to file reports to the CDC.
How To Report An Adverse Event To VAERS (CDC Database) ONLINE Following Covid-19 Vaccination
On the CDC's 'how to' page for reporting to VAERS, the linked table of 'reportable events' which lists the names of vaccines, does not include Covid. That makes sense, at first, because the Covid 'vaccines' are not actually vaccines. However, it certainly must discourage some from reporting their struggles.
So the numbers of reports the CDC is throttled back by challenges the patients face just to file, as are the CDC's decision to publish only a fraction of the reports it receives to VAERS.
And of course, the Harvard research which found only about 1% of actual vaccine adverse events were ever reported to the CDC was conducted was prior to Covid lockdowns which reduced medical and nursing home staff available to file such reports.
Certainly, there are concerns about reports that at nursing homes are under reporting cause of death a level never seen before.
I've heard that we 'must understand' that the most vulerable were vaccinated first and therefore early reports contained a higher proportion of deaths. I don't know if that's true, because based on the conduct of the CDC since the start of the Plandemic, I'm not willing to assume that the CDC is randomly selecting which records it will upload. They could be selectively withholding death reports based on age or other combinations of demographics and instead publishing less severe adverse events.
Remember that reports from December and January are not updated after the patient leaves the ER or hospital, so if those who were surviving during their ER visit, hospital stay or other event reported to VAERS, but continued a downward spiral and died afterwards, their deaths are not counted.]
Note that the table below does not include records in which a check mark was missing from a specific field in VAERS, but 'death' or 'autopsy request' was typed in the 'event descripton' for the patient.
Also, of the 80 deaths published to VAERS during this time period but classified as vaccine type 'unknown' about half of the 20 I reviewed had text in the description field which indicated they were Covid 'vaccines'. Therefore, some numbers are still under reported in the table below.
Note that 270 deaths following Covid vaccines published to VAERS are 'unknown age' and are not shown in the table.
There are many complications with poorly maintained data in VAERS which impedes understanding of the impact vaccines may be having on the public. Again, if the CDC would like to clarify these concerns during what they claim is a national emergency updating and correcting data in VAERS, they have the tax payer funds to do so.
The CDC tracks every vaccination carefully, something they would do even if they weren't preparing to roll out vaccine passport mandates.
I believe the NIH/CDC/FDA have the IT and access/infrastructure to match data from other federal or state databases, like US death certificates, with with vaccine records by Social Security Number, if they wanted to. Hospital software tracks annual deaths by type (accidental death versus illness) so surely there are medical databases which could be matched to vaccination databases - likely both types of data are sitting in the same system(s) right now.
Do you think 610,000 deaths following Covid 'vaccinations' is an over estimate? Okay, cut it in half. So the estimate becomes 'only' 305,000 deaths following Covid 'vaccination'. Is everything alright now?
If you think the CDC is concerned, you'd be wrong. Their only concern is concealing this information from the public.
Here's the data from VAERS and a percentage of reporting:
| Symptom | From Survey | Total in Vax Pop | Reported in VAERS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fatigue | 53.9% | 80,850,000 | 28391 | 0.04 |
| headache | 46.7% | 70,050,000 | 49367 | 0.07 |
| myalgia | 44.0% | 66,000,000 | 5294 | 0.008 |
| chills | 31.3% | 46,950,000 | 39038 | 0.08 |
| fever | 29.5% | 44,250,000 | 45243 | 0.1 |
| joint pain | 25.6% | 38,400,000 | 6300 | 0.02 |
Not even 1%. The closest reporting ratio is 0.1% for fever IOW VAERS reports have between 1/1000th and 1/10,000th of the actual events.
I was given something like page 4 here: https://www.fda.gov/media/146305/download Mine was a single sheet of paper. Unfortunately I had to help my friend who can't walk well and left my sheet behind. It doesn't say "don't report your fever". But only 0.1% of the people with fever reported their fever.
I never once said these vaccines are safe compared to a flu shot. I think they have unknown safety and less safety for some groups like those with stronger immune systems. But the question is what is the rate of reporting of serious side effects, and delay or deletion of such reports from VAERS? That's the only way we can extrapolate actual numbers from VAERS numbers. The Harvard study says "1% of vaccine adverse events " Do they mean only serious? Or are they including the fever which is only 0.1% reported right now.
Not arguing against your point, but to be sure, if there were 600,000 deaths, it’s not as though most of us would know, anyway, as the censorious scribes at Facebooger, Twit-Er, etc. would keep the info from most of the public.
What would be the cause of death on the death certificates for these adverse events? Scroll through a few pages and let me know.
FWIW.
Coronavirus PING!
How could one possibly know without a complete medical history and full medical examination of the body?
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
600,000 deaths right now would mean a 50% increase in total deaths. There is no indication anywhere of that kind of excess mortality. In fact, mortality in the US has returned to normal levels for the first time since March 2020.
If 600,000 people have died from the vaccines, where are the bodies? Certainly not in the morgues, the funeral homes, or the cemeteries.
I'm just using the very generous standard Faux-Xi used in attributing deaths to the coof in the first place in order to get his investments a chance at the BIG MONEY.
Well, thanks for the Freepathon help Noobie!!
Much appreciated.
Take your *own* advice.
There's one ingredient you missed.
In order for whoever did the reporting, to correlate the death with the vax, the person injected must have *died*.
Kinda hard to miss that one.
Glad to oblige Jim. There were times I couldn’t.
I don’t expect any of the liars to contribute...
No challenge can get through to them.
Hope you’re not foisting this idiocy on your friends and family. They expect better of you, and would be disappointed.
Hey, troll-boi, good to hear from you.
I'm sure, for example, that plastic surgeons, podiatrists, pediatric oncology doctors, and LASIK specialists are knocking the doors of medical journals down, to share their exciting discoveries about the coof.
Try again, Einstain.
Events are easier because the person can self-report. How many do? I just showed an analysis (see above) that shows that only 0.1% of people have reported their fever into VAERS. Part of that is because people expect fever and don't consider it adverse. But part of it is they have no idea there is a VAERS system, too lazy, etc.
The bigger question with events is the serious events. If someone has a heart attack and goes to the hospital, how many of those are reported? I presume that in the 15 minute waiting period, anyone with a heart attack in the waiting area should be reported. Are they? No idea. But they should be reported for VAERS to have any credibility.
What about the next day? Does the ER guy ask when the heart attack victim had their shot? Don't know but it's probably not the ER guy's first priority. Mostly going to try to help the patient.
Sad...
Well, there’s my hundred bucks.
I assume the liars won’t send anything for their abuse of this forum.
Let me know if I’m wrong.
I don’t believe it, because considering it’s DEATHS, I figure most of those would be reported to VAERS. Mild symptoms might only be reported sometimes.
But I’m just saying, if it actually were 600,000, Facebooger, Twit-Er, Alphabits-Gewgle-Youboob, etc. would cover it right up.
YOu appear to be butthurt so I've called a Waaahmbulance.
Troll tag-teaming.
And just think, a few posts ago it was complaining about the same cut-and-paste nonsense on every thread over and over again.
Had no idea it was getting so worn out by its own posts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.