Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DR JUDY A MIKOVITS BANNED VIDEO PLANDEMIC (25 minutes) Contains Horrific Fauci Revelations
Dr. Judy Mikovits ^ | Approximately May 2020 | Dr. Judy Mikovits

Posted on 05/22/2021 7:16:53 PM PDT by Hostage

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: semimojo

I am talking in terms of, it should have been obvious that we were being lied to right off the bat. Pun intended. The video supports that conclusion in great detail.


41 posted on 05/23/2021 11:45:31 AM PDT by Neverlift (When someone says "you just can't make this stuff up" odds are good, somebody did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

Incorrect. Actually I watched it last year. And I have watched several that she has done...

You called her an idiot and refuted her facts but you did not providing any links to support your position.


42 posted on 05/23/2021 1:26:08 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (If I wanted to live in China, I would move there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2
You called her an idiot and refuted her facts but you did not providing any links to support your position.

Here you go:

"SARS-CoV-2 is genetically similar to SARS-CoV. SARS-CoV is the nearest human coronavirus relative of SARS-CoV-2 with an 86.85% similarity, which is reflected in their similar names. The currently known closest relative of SARS-CoV-2 is the bat coronavirus RaTG13 which has 96.75% similarity.

This suggests all three viruses have a similar ancestor, but SARS CoV-2 and RaTG13 have a more recent shared ancestor. Whilst the exact origin of SARS-CoV-2 is not yet known, most researchers think it originated from a bat coronavirus and some suspect that an intermediate species hosted the virus, possibly a pangolin due to similarities between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and those found in pangolin coronaviruses.

"

If you actually believe SARS CoV-2 evolved from SARS CoV-1, as she claims, I'm happy to provide many more sources indicating that's not the case.

Do you, or anyone you know, actually believe that?

What's your explanation for why she says it? Do you think it's ignorance or deceit - or some other motive?

43 posted on 05/23/2021 2:29:54 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

With all due respect, I did not call her an idiot. I don’t claim to be an expert.

That said, tho I appreciate your actually finding a link, the link’s author is no expert either...IMHO, Zoppi cobbled together some info...Kind of like a college English term paper...Here are her credentials:

Author: Lois Zoppi is a freelance copywriter based in the UK. She graduated from the University of Sussex with a BA in Media Practice, having specialized in screenwriting. She maintains a focus on anxiety disorders and depression and aims to explore other areas of mental health including dissociative disorders such as maladaptive daydreaming.

I found this quote from your Zoppi link troubling:

“SARS-CoV was believed to have been initially transmitted from small mammals in a mutated form to humans.

Pretty much EVERYONE is saying COVID likely was engineered...Even Fauci has changed his tune from last year... https://www.breitbart.com/health/2021/05/23/anthony-fauci-reverses-course-not-convinced-chinese-coronavirus-developed-naturally/

From one of your link’s footnotes: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/sars/

There have been 2 self-limiting SARS outbreaks, which resulted in a highly contagious and potentially life-threatening form of pneumonia. Both happened between 2002 and 2004.

Since 2004, there have not been any known cases of SARS reported anywhere in the world.

The World Health Organization (WHO) continues to monitor countries throughout the world for any unusual disease activity. If there was another SARS outbreak, it should be possible to limit the spread of infection.

The first 2 paragraphs actually might back up the “idiot’s” contention... (The Doc with a PhD and years of experience in the field who explicitly states is not anti-vaxxer.)

Last paragraph...Limit the spread? Sure! WHO really was spot-OFF with that statement...

You source has 5/9 footnotes from all my “trusted favorites” including Lancet (now dependably liberal), CDC and 3 from the ever dependable WHO...

So no thank you...You can source and quote until the cows come home; however, I will accept Mikovits’ expertise in the field because she is going against your status quo administration line—and had a lot to lose coming forward...

BTW, I said a family member of mine works in the field—has PhD in biotech breeding/genetics. I asked and they said what Mikovits said could be possible. So again, I will go with them and Mikovits.

Enjoy your evening.


44 posted on 05/23/2021 3:52:25 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (If I wanted to live in China, I would move there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2
Wall of words.

I can't help but notice you didn't answer the fundamental question.

Do you or anyone you know think SARS CoV-2 evolved from SARS CoV-1 as the doctor claims?

45 posted on 05/23/2021 5:34:06 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

???? Answer!? Yes I did—I stated my family member said they thought it was possible (tho we did not spend large amount of time on the subject), and I would believe them and Mikovits over some of your propagandized sources.

As my “wall of words” stated, I am not an expert but I did address your source’s claims. I would encourage you to read some of the links from your source—if you are the science expert you are implying you are, then I think some of those sources indicate it is possible.

Regardless, l am guessing you got the jab. Good for you...

I am waiting, and I appreciated Hostage posting...

Sleep well.


46 posted on 05/23/2021 6:02:49 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (If I wanted to live in China, I would move there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2
I stated my family member said they thought it was possible (tho we did not spend large amount of time on the subject), and I would believe them and Mikovits over some of your propagandized sources.

So you belive the Covid-19 virus evolved from the SARS virus.

Happy to hear you aren't an anti-vaxxer. Those folks are dishonest.

47 posted on 05/23/2021 6:40:33 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

Mikovits video was a year old. Not sure what she thinks now.

I don’t know why you are so hung up on one thing....Regardless of what COVID strain was used as a base, I believe it was BIOENGINEERED...as do many!

As I said they could have used SARS. I believe much was added to whatever virus was the base...and I (and my other family members who all have advanced degrees in science or healthcare) don’t think it originated in a bat cave 1,000 miles from Wuhan or that it jumped from bats to a Pangolin that bit someone or someone ate in Wuhan wet market.

I do believe they likely did use some existing Coronavirus for which genetically modified the spike proteins...However, I am not an expert and have never claimed to be.

Sleep well.


48 posted on 05/23/2021 7:04:35 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (If I wanted to live in China, I would move there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

> “This (SARS CoV-2) occurred from SARS 1 in a decade”

And what’s wrong with that statement?

I know the answer but I just want to hear you explain why it makes her an ‘idiot’.


49 posted on 05/23/2021 7:16:02 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
And what’s wrong with that statement?

As I posted above there are very significant genomic differences between SARS CoV-1 and SARS CoV-2, and CoV-2 is much more closely related to other coronaviruses observed in the wild.

There's no evidence, genomic or otherwise, that one evolved from the other and she's the first person I've ever heard to even suggest the possibility.

She's stating it as a fact. Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence and she's supplied none.

50 posted on 05/23/2021 8:06:18 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2
I don’t know why you are so hung up on one thing...

Because she's being presented here as an authority, presumably to influence other FReepers.

It should matter if people you're told to listen to spout nonsense.

51 posted on 05/23/2021 8:08:25 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Thanks for posting!

Refreshing to see more Freepers understand what is happening and why our Republic is in trouble.


52 posted on 05/23/2021 8:10:14 PM PDT by Enlightened1 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

She said ‘occurred, right? She didn’t say ‘evolved’?

The homology between Cov 1 and Cov 2 is about 80%.

Cov 2 is closer to Coronaviruses in the wild, really?’ So you think Cov 2 is a wild virus, not engineered.

Dr. Luc Montagnier, Nobel Prize Winner in Medicine, his lab sequenced and analyzed Cov 2 and found it was engineered; veritable segments of HIV virus in it.

Is Dr. Montagnier also an ‘idiot’? Dr. Mikovits worked with Dr. Montagnier, knows him personally. Would you say she got her idiocy from Dr. Montagnier?


53 posted on 05/23/2021 8:22:14 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
She said ‘occurred, right? She didn’t say ‘evolved’?

She said occurred from.

Is Dr. Montagnier also an ‘idiot’? Dr. Mikovits worked with Dr. Montagnier, knows him personally. Would you say she got her idiocy from Dr. Montagnier?

Could be. I've heard anti-vaxxers are incestuous.

54 posted on 05/23/2021 8:28:29 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Here is one of many videos of medical practicing Doctors all saying the same thing that are being censored.

Watch many Doctors, that are all being censored, telling you their opinion.

People need to quit listening to politicians, bureaucrats, State run media and Bill Gates for medical advise.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/H9GyqoPMvfRa/


55 posted on 05/23/2021 8:38:29 PM PDT by Enlightened1 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Legal letter:

Dear Boss,

Compelling any employee to take any current Covid-19 vaccine violates federal and state law.

First, federal law prohibits any mandate of the Covid-19 vaccines as unlicensed, emergency-use-authorization-only vaccines. Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Emergency Use Authorization section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, demands that everyone give employees the “option to accept or refuse administration” of the Covid-19 vaccine. This right to refuse emergency, experimental vaccines, such as the Covid-19 vaccine, implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. ( [http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/] ). As the Nuremberg Code established, every person must “be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision” for any medical experimental drug, as the Covid-19 vaccine currently is. The Nuremberg Code prohibited even the military from requiring such experimental vaccines. (Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (D.D.C. 2003).

Secondly, demanding employees divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy, and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).)

Third, conditioning continued employment upon participating in a medical experiment and demanding disclosure of private, personal medical information, may also create employer liability under other federal and state laws, including HIPAA, FMLA, and applicable state tort law principles, including torts prohibiting and proscribing invasions of privacy and battery. Indeed, any employer mandating a vaccine is liable to their employee for any adverse event suffered by that employee. ( [https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#vaccine] ). The CDC records reports of the adverse events already reported to date concerning the current Covid-19 vaccine.( [https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vaers.html] )

With Regards,

Employee of the Year


56 posted on 05/23/2021 8:40:43 PM PDT by Enlightened1 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
Legal letter:

Dear Boss,

Compelling any employee to take any current Covid-19 vaccine violates federal and state law.

First, federal law prohibits any mandate of the Covid-19 vaccines as unlicensed, emergency-use-authorization-only vaccines. Subsection bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) of section 360 of Title 21 of the United States Code, otherwise known as the Emergency Use Authorization section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, demands that everyone give employees the “option to accept or refuse administration” of the Covid-19 vaccine. This right to refuse emergency, experimental vaccines, such as the Covid-19 vaccine, implements the internationally agreed legal requirement of Informed Consent established in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. ( [http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/] ). As the Nuremberg Code established, every person must “be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision” for any medical experimental drug, as the Covid-19 vaccine currently is. The Nuremberg Code prohibited even the military from requiring such experimental vaccines. (Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (D.D.C. 2003).

Secondly, demanding employees divulge their personal medical information invades their protected right to privacy, and discriminates against them based on their perceived medical status, in contravention of the Americans with Disabilities Act. (42 USC §12112(a).)

Third, conditioning continued employment upon participating in a medical experiment and demanding disclosure of private, personal medical information, may also create employer liability under other federal and state laws, including HIPAA, FMLA, and applicable state tort law principles, including torts prohibiting and proscribing invasions of privacy and battery. Indeed, any employer mandating a vaccine is liable to their employee for any adverse event suffered by that employee. ( [https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/faqs#vaccine] ). The CDC records reports of the adverse events already reported to date concerning the current Covid-19 vaccine.( [https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vaers.html] )

With Regards,

Employee of the Year
57 posted on 05/23/2021 8:41:26 PM PDT by Enlightened1 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

< “Could be. I’ve heard anti-vaxxers are incestuous.”

Ok ok, now it’s clear what you are. Yep.

Neither is Anti-Vax but your words place you into a category of calling anyone who reveals Cov 2 as engineered including Nobel Prize winners as ‘idiots’ and ‘Anti-Vaxxers’.

Thanks for revealing your true colors.


58 posted on 05/23/2021 9:05:06 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Bookmark.


59 posted on 05/23/2021 9:07:58 PM PDT by Pajamajan ( PRAY FOR OUR NATION. I will never be a peaceful slave in a new Socialist America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
Neither is Anti-Vax...

Of course they aren't.

By the way, what was the next word in that sentence?

60 posted on 05/23/2021 9:12:12 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson