Replies

Incorrect. Actually I watched it last year. And I have watched several that she has done...

You called her an idiot and refuted her facts but you did not providing any links to support your position.

You called her an idiot and refuted her facts but you did not providing any links to support your position.

Here you go:

"SARS-CoV-2 is genetically similar to SARS-CoV. SARS-CoV is the nearest human coronavirus relative of SARS-CoV-2 with an 86.85% similarity, which is reflected in their similar names. The currently known closest relative of SARS-CoV-2 is the bat coronavirus RaTG13 which has 96.75% similarity.
This suggests all three viruses have a similar ancestor, but SARS CoV-2 and RaTG13 have a more recent shared ancestor. Whilst the exact origin of SARS-CoV-2 is not yet known, most researchers think it originated from a bat coronavirus and some suspect that an intermediate species hosted the virus, possibly a pangolin due to similarities between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and those found in pangolin coronaviruses.

If you actually believe SARS CoV-2 evolved from SARS CoV-1, as she claims, I'm happy to provide many more sources indicating that's not the case.

Do you, or anyone you know, actually believe that?

What's your explanation for why she says it? Do you think it's ignorance or deceit - or some other motive?