New Study Shows COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects May Be More Common and Severe in Covid Recovered Recipients

PJ Media ^ | 05/19/2021 | Stacey Lennox

[SeekAndFind]

A new study of COVID-19 vaccine recipients globally should give the public health community a reason to reevaluate recommendations that everyone needs to be vaccinated regardless of prior infection with the virus. The researchers surveyed slightly more than 2,000 self-reporting vaccinated individuals who were at least seven days past their first vaccine dose and monitored their reports of side effects and their severity through the vaccination process. They compared the results for recovered patients with a confirmed COVID-19 PCR or antigen test with those who had not had COVID-19. From the study (emphasis mine):

People with prior COVID-19 exposure were largely excluded from the vaccine trials and, as a result, the safety and reactogenicity of the vaccines in this population have not been previously fully evaluated. For the first time, this study demonstrates a significant association between prior COVID19 infection and a significantly higher incidence and severity of self-reported side effects after vaccination for COVID-19. Consistently, compared to the first dose of the vaccine, we found an increased incidence and severity of self-reported side effects after the second dose, when recipients had been previously exposed to viral antigen. In view of the rapidly accumulating data demonstrating that COVID-19 survivors generally have adequate natural immunity for at least 6 months, it may be appropriate to re-evaluate the recommendation for immediate vaccination of this group.

While this is the first study of its kind and certainly warrants further examination, particularly because the side effects were self-reported, it acknowledges something that the public health bureaucracy, including CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and Dr. Anthony Fauci, rarely, if ever, mention. The science has consistently shown an adequate immune response in recovered patients, and we also know that the response includes more than just antibodies.

[2aProtectsTheRest]

I’m very sorry to hear about your mom. Regardless of any disagreements you and I may ever have, family is family. She is in my prayers.

[myerson]

I posted this before and got no response. I got 2 Moderna vaccine shots FEB 6 & MAR 6, and have had 2 negative Covid Tests. I have had no sickness or so much as a sore arm from either shot. However, a couple of weeks ago I noticed red splotches developing on my toes, nowhere else. Google tells me that “red splotches on toes” such as I have is most likely “Covid Toes”. Has anyone else here had anything similar develop?

[bobbo666]

If they have had the infection, why in E’ll are they getting a “vaccine”, especially a fake one like being offered? Isn’t their doctor telling them that since their immune system knows what to hunt out and kill, they are now OK?

[Jane Long]

Prayers up, FRiend.

I’ve heard of several instances where docs are recommending these to cancer patients. :-(

[Jane Long]

Isn’t their doctor telling them that since their immune system knows what to hunt out and kill, they are now OK?

---

No. Just the opposite.

See #11.

[Jane Long]

That line just keeps getting higher :..(

[SecAmndmt]

At least one of the patients I mentioned in my previous post had had cv19, and then got the vax. Now: in hospital with the clots.

A former client had cv19 last year, and still got the vaccine. He explained that the MD told him the cv19 made him 95% immune to future infection, and the vaccine covered the other 5%. What kind of MD is so unethical to give out this kind of false information?

My brother is 100% conventional is his medical views (as a patient). His youngest son (late teens) got the cv19vx because he had had lung problems in the past. Unbelievable to me. No vitamin D blood test has ever been done on this teen. He eats poorly, is underweight and (in my view) is greatly lacking in nutrition.

[Jane Long]

THAT is crazy. Sorry to hear all of this.

Allowing the kiddos to be subjected to this, is...well...beyond belief.

I wish your nephew the very best.

That immunity % coverage number, by that doc, is also crazy. Agree....who would even say this?

[SecAmndmt]

That immunity % coverage number, by that doc, is also crazy. Agree....who would even say this?

I work with applied sciences people, mostly. Tbh, as a group they are about the least open to basic common sense, they are very much open to fantastical narratives like the plandemic (so long as allegedly reputable ppl are peddling the narrative), they lean to atheism, or perhaps they embrace scientism ("trust the science" instead of "trust God"