At least one of the patients I mentioned in my previous post had had cv19, and then got the vax. Now: in hospital with the clots.
A former client had cv19 last year, and still got the vaccine. He explained that the MD told him the cv19 made him 95% immune to future infection, and the vaccine covered the other 5%. What kind of MD is so unethical to give out this kind of false information?
My brother is 100% conventional is his medical views (as a patient). His youngest son (late teens) got the cv19vx because he had had lung problems in the past. Unbelievable to me. No vitamin D blood test has ever been done on this teen. He eats poorly, is underweight and (in my view) is greatly lacking in nutrition.
THAT is crazy. Sorry to hear all of this.
Allowing the kiddos to be subjected to this, is...well...beyond belief.
I wish your nephew the very best.
That immunity % coverage number, by that doc, is also crazy. Agree....who would even say this?