Posted on 05/14/2021 7:22:47 AM PDT by Auntie Mame
This doctor talks about Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) and Relative Risk Reduction (RRD) of the Covid "vaccines." You will be shocked. We are living through a perfect example of lying with statistics. Interesting to note that to prevent just 1 Covid-19 case 256 individuals must get the vaccine; the other 255 individuals derive no benefit, but are subject to vaccine adverse effects, whatever they may be.
Dr. Ron Brown of Waterloo University talks about his Cambridge and Medicina Paper. We discuss relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction measures in the evaluation of clinical trial data.
Dr. Ron Brown discusses the danger of outcome reporting bias and the misleading conclusions and violations of informed consent from outcome reporting bias in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine clinical trials.
I could never before wrap my mind around the 95% effectiveness of the "vaccines" and how that number was derived. Now, I understand perfectly and we're being deliberately deceived about this "vaccine" and others.
Prepare to be informed.
I have mentioned many times the potential for various biases in the data, both in the trials and in the real world. There is reason to be optimistic that the virus is behind us, but that too is subject to bias. It could have nothing whatever to do with vaccines.
So Ron Brown survived the plane crash on approach to Dubrovnik?
It’s a 30 minute vid.
A transcript is provided, at YT link....can you summarize from that, or from your viewing notes?
TIA.
The article starts out with a ridiculous lie, so I’m not going to watch the other 25 minutes of garbage. 10% of the US has had Covid. The vaccine is at least 90% effective. If everyone is given the vaccine, then instead of 10% of the remaining population, who haven’t already had covid, getting Covid, only 1% will get Covid. For every 10 people given the vaccine 1 case will be prevented. The ratio is 10 vaccines per case prevented, not 255 vaccines per case prevented. If you assume everyone who has not gotten Covid, would get it eventually if not for the vaccine, for each 10 persons vaccinated, 9 people are prevented from getting it.
But logic won’t prevent publicity-seeking idiots from making their videos.
“But logic won’t prevent publicity-seeking idiots from making their videos.”
****************************************************
And imbecile agendanistas from promoting them.
Watch the whole video and comment. He goes through his reasoning process. If you can debunk his reasoning — fine. But you have to at least understand his reasoning.
here are the papers.
“Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996517/
This second paper is from 2014 and it has good background on the limitations of Phase 3 trials and good information about ARR vs. RRR.
“The complementary roles of Phase 3 trials and post-licensure surveillance in the evaluation of new vaccines”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4596394/
Thanks for the effort, but I hope you don’t think you’re going to change the minds of the pro-vaxxers; like most FReepers, they’re a hard headed bunch, who are loathe to admit it when they’re wrong.
I pretty much summarized the video in the post.
The talk is about Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) and Relative Risk Reduction (RRD) of the Covid “vaccines,” and can be applied to just about anything. The doctor very clearly describes how we’re being deceived with statistics, and it’s not just with this “vaccine.” It was an eye-opener for me.
These are great. Thank you.
This graphic (I hope it works) shows what the doctor is talking about. We are given the relative risk reduction statistic of something like 95% effective which this doctor says is a figure useful only to researchers but it sounds good for efficacy. But the absolute risk reduction is a completely different, and much less scary number. Here’s the graphic that makes it clearer, especially when listening to the doctor at the same time. BTW, the interviewer is excellent.
I’m beginning to think that those people that say putting fluoride in the water makes people dumber have a point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
