Calm down, pharma boy. Everybody knows he's not.
YOU, on the other hand...
Posted on 05/03/2021 5:27:51 AM PDT by ransomnote
Some people have questioned my concern over both the CDC and John Hopkins University is a PRIVATE organization where the CDC accepts private funding – NOT ONLY GOVERNMENT! The CDC is quasi-government under the Department of Health and Human Services which strangely has sources of funding that are predicated on the fact that it also has a private 501(c)(3) public charity, like the Clinton Foundation. The CDC Foundation receives charitable contributions and philanthropic grants from individuals, foundations, corporations, universities, NGOs and other organizations to advance the work of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This is NOT a government-funded organization. It is not exclusively a government-funded – very curious.
I have serious questions as to what is being driven by the CDC in conjunction with John Hopkins University who takes $1.8 billion from Bloomberg. The CDC and John Hopkins are either deliberately trying to create an economic depression, or are sublimely ignorant of the consequences of their scorched earth policy. Yes, we can cure contagions by sequestering everyone and shutting down the economy. We all then live on handouts from the government, stay home, don’t work, and watch TV? As one reader commented: “Mirror, Mirror, on the wall; Guess we are all socialists after all!”
No vested/conflict of interest here....
Calm down, pharma boy. Everybody knows he's not.
YOU, on the other hand...
This is very helpful information.
Gives substance to what we already knew—that the CDC is not trustworthy.
Trustworthiness will separate wheat from tares, in this world and in the next.
The liars will wish they had chosen Truth.
Jane Long wrote: “(WRONG-O....and, you were corrected by ransomnote, and SEVERAL others, on that fib, McGee.)”
As I said: “...Pfizer has completed the lengthy part of the process. Thousands participated in the phase 1/2/3 trials. Hundreds of thousands of doses have been administered. The data clearly shows the vaccines are safe and effective. Pfizer/Moderna are about to submit their applications for full Approval. It’s been estimated that full Approval might be granted in six months.”
https://www.contagionlive.com/view/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-91-percent-effective-6-months
“The first US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) marketing approval for a COVID-19 vaccine may be imminent.”
“Pfizer and BioNTech intend to submit the six-month data for publication in a scientific peer-reviewed journal. The data will also be included in a BLA submission to the FDA, which has currently granted EUA to 3 COVID-19 vaccines, but marketing approval to none.”
“These data confirm the favorable efficacy and safety profile of our vaccine and position us to submit a Biologics License Application to the U.S. FDA,” Albert Bourla, chairman and chief executive officer of Pfizer, said in a statement. “The high vaccine efficacy observed through up to six months following a second dose and against the variant prevalent in South Africa provides further confidence in our vaccine’s overall effectiveness.”
And this:
https://www.nuventra.com/resources/blog/submitting-your-fda-marketing-application/
“Current FDA performance goals under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) stipulate that FDA intends to review and act on 90% of standard NDA and BLA submissions within 10 months of the filing date. The goal for priority review applications is 6 months.Jun 5, 2019”
UP YOURS.
And you're assuming facts not in evidence.
And you're a troll.
And you're using the classic "Deny, Accuse, Reverse Victim and Offender" psy-op technique.
See, I asked you first.
I've never even as much as HEARD of "anti-vax" or even "anti-mRNA" organizations. (Notice that's not ducking the question like YOU did. If I've never even as much as heard of them, then they can't be paying me...or I would have heard of them.)
We KNOW the pushers of the jabs are funding influencers online, and the producers are making cringe-worthy videos.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/
"I'm a #Pfizer Girl... in a #Covid world" 💉😂 Of course the #PfizerVaccine would have its own song! @MissyModell #CovidVaccine #PfizerPrincess #PfizerGang #COVID19 #PfizerGirl pic.twitter.com/6yZMh610Sr— John Walsh (@itsJohnWalsh) April 9, 2021
AND we know the official estimates of death tolls which would "require" drastic measure, are bullcrap.
Imperial College, self-described as "China's best academic partner in the west," predicted Taiwan, China's oldest adversary, would experience 179,828 COVID deaths if they didn't lock down. Taiwan had no lockdown and had 10 COVID deaths, a 1,798,180% error.https://t.co/l8MlaRw1uH— Michael P Senger (@MichaelPSenger) April 22, 2021
Try harder, troll.
You’re dodging the question so let’s rephrase the question: Please prove you’re not being paid for you posted opinions by anti-mRNA organizations.
Well, Pharmbot projector....our first clue is that, unlike YOU, whisker’s posts, since the release of these UNPROVEN, EXPERIMENTAL agent shots, have NOT been 98% fake vaccine related.
You’ve been outed, again and again with your non-stop ‘vax’ pushing and, now, your mandate glee.
Give it up, already.
You dodged the question first, then did the classic psy-op DARVO technique.
I conclude you’re not only paid, you’re a professional infiltrator.
Compromised CDC bookmark
grey_whiskers wrote: “We KNOW the pushers of the jabs are funding influencers online, and the producers are making cringe-worthy videos.”
I find videos to be a complete waste of time.
Find something published in a credible medical journal.
From your link, Dug....
....“It is an important step to further confirm the strong efficacy and good safety data we have seen so far, especially in a longer-term follow-up,” Ugur Sahin, chief executive officer and co-founder of BioNTech, said. “These data also provide the first clinical results that a vaccine can effectively protect against currently circulating variants, a critical factor to reach herd immunity and end this pandemic for the global population.”....
Long term??? LOL.
I can’t see where they’re tracking the people who dropped dead, after taking these shots, as part of their ‘study’.
And, why would we even begin to trust/believe a study being touted by the CEO of BioNTech, on their own shots?????
He said, ““These data also provide the first clinical results that a vaccine can effectively protect against currently circulating variants, a critical factor to reach herd immunity and end this pandemic for the global population.”....
Amazing!!!! He’s on the same Globalist ‘Vax for All’ page that Prince Harry and Ben Afleck are on.
And, you post this ‘study’ as legit.
They’re feeding you Pharmbots BAD links.
No sale, Mr Mandate these Vax’s For All.
Hoist on your own petard.
That second video was pro-vaccination.
Way to go, Einstein.
...journal articles will come, along with the Nuremburg-type trials.
And I’ve been posting links medical journals, like the Lancet and the British Medical Journal.
Not that that’s enough. One of the mRNA shills posted an article they were bragging about the testing on the jabs with, from the New England Journal of Medicine, it was animal testing.
Too bad the entire cohort (subject + control) was 24 animals.
That’s not enough for statistics, unless you’re CNN on the 2020 Election.
Which Trump won in a landslide.
Jane Long wrote: “No sale, Mr Mandate these Vax’s For All.”
Do you dispute the data I provided that supports my comments that the vaccines could be APPROVED in six months?
grey_whiskers wrote: “Hoist on your own petard. That second video was pro-vaccination.”
I really don’t care whether a video supports or does not support any subject. I refuse to waste my time watching videos. That include videos of cats, dogs, and children.
Your paranoia haz a strong.
Everyone who disagrees with you is a secret agent paid
to promote an agenda and they ALL OUT to GETCHA! BOO!
Like the Lancet?
Ooops.......
Hey, at least they’re not blog-pimps. That would be terrible.
Do you dispute the data I provided that supports my comments that the vaccines could be APPROVED in six months?
I don’t put anything past the DS/globalists.
The fact that you’re asking if the data you provided “supports my comments that the vaccines could be APPROVED in six months”, rather than the truth or accuracy of said data, is further proof of your “vax” pushing, Pharmbot agenda.
You keep outing yourself, over and over, again.
In my mind, there’s not much doubt they will be approved before the year is out.
But certainly not based on its safety record. More likely for the purposes of trying to mandate it, which they cannot do under the EUA.
Considering that the government and big pharma are all in bed together, approval will not be an issue at all. All they need is their orders and financing from the Deep State and NWO movers, $oro$, Gate$, et al.
That’s a shame, the female singer was rather cute.
“Hi-ya Pfizer.”
“Hi, Ben”
“Ya got any more of those COVID shots?”
“Sure do, Ben”
“Sleeves up.”
“I’m a Pfizer girl
in a COVID world
I’m the classic
m-RNA-tastic
95%
There’s no argument
There’s no contagion
with my vaccination
“C’mon Pfizer, let’s go party”
“With a Mask On”
“C’mon Pfizer, let’s go travel”
“Only if...essential”
Oh, we’re having SO much fun!
We have to do this again for my second shot
I Love You Ben.
That must be what your side considers “science”
Stuff it.
Or are they?
Hmmm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.