So the first half of the premise is transparently true by the manufacturers' own admissions.
The second half contains a fallacy: that bioweapons are necessarily designed to kill people.
I already covered that upthread.
You get your impressions from James Bond movies, it seems.
I think this virus was bioengineered; the modifications to the spike to make it more infective to humans make it at least a possible weapon-under-investigation. Not all weapons need to be designed to kill.
For the mRNA jab, the marketwatch link as well as the video I posted upthread with the doctor explaining how the spike proteins affect the endothelial cells in the blood vessels, make it clear that the spike protein was KNOWN to cause all kinds of problems.
So why inject the entire population with an untested dangerous artificial modality which has never worked before, over OTC mediations which have been around 40 years, which Dr. Fauci himself said over a decade ago were magic cures for coronavirus?
“Not all weapons need to be designed to kill.”
....
Not all weapons are designed to kill immediately.
And in today’s technological age it is entirely reasonable to believe that today’s injections are for tomorrow’s kill.
grey_whiskers wrote: “The second half contains a fallacy: that bioweapons are necessarily designed to kill people.”
Thank you for admitting the premise of the posted article is incorrect.
From the article: “Every single one of these doctors believe that these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings.”
So, we’re not discussing the origins of the virus but the nature of the vaccine.
Once you dismiss the central nature of the posted article, the entire article falls apart.