Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: greeneyes; impimp

Pinging the flubros host.
2 birds, one stone.

Some encouragment for those avoiding the vaxx:

https://www.fox26houston.com/news/houston-area-nurse-says-he-was-terminated-for-declining-the-covid-19-vaccine

“...there are the two exemption that both deal with accomodations...One of them is an accomodation under the American with Disabilities Act and the second exception is an accomodation on a religious basis. In order to establish an entitlement under the ADA, the employee would have to provide some sort of documentation from a doctor explaining why he or she, could not or should not receive the vaccination due to some medical condition or disability,” Craighead explained.”

Seems to me that, if your doctor can provide documentation that you have “recovery immunity” and that you have no need for the vaxx, then you have an ADA accommodation.


673 posted on 05/01/2021 5:08:48 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Patriots, stop looking at the politicians as enemies. Look at the complicit Legacy Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel

My doctor mentioned to us that she will provide documents showing auto-immune conditions, precluding and exempting us from any mandatory shots.

Thank you doc!


717 posted on 05/01/2021 8:50:22 AM PDT by SheepWhisperer (My enemy saw me on my knees, head bowed and thought they had won until I rose up and said Amen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel; impimp

Seems to me that, if your doctor can provide documentation that you have “recovery immunity” and that you have no need for the vaxx, then you have an ADA accommodation.
******************************************************************************
I would see a lawyer about suing the Employer. Since this treatment is only “authorized” under an emergency use — the US Code/law relating to emergency use provides that it must be voluntary.

The right to require a Vax-which this is NOT- is dependent on it actually having the lengthy protocols and tests to actually be “APPROVED” - the emergency authorization more appropriately is similar to “right to try”.

And the Nuremberg Code also provides that such medical treatments foisted on unwilling participants are a crime against humanity.

So - it’s illegal, a violation of civil rights, and a crime against humanity.

Nuff said.


953 posted on 05/01/2021 10:44:07 PM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson