Posted on 04/25/2021 8:08:42 PM PDT by ransomnote
The CDC is far behind in publishing reports of adverse events it receives. As of April 6, only 25% of actual reports of adverse events were available in VAERS. In the past month as rate of vaccination increased, the CDC drastically reduced the rate that it now publishes received reports. This means that there may be at minimum four times the number of strokes published in VAERS already reported to the CDC.
Even though the CDC is underreporting adverse events for Covid-19 'vaccines' by simply not publishing them, the remaining reports which are published already account 11% of all adverse events in (30+ years of) VAERS after just 4 months of 'vaccine's' administration.
The Covid-19 vaccines are the 2nd largest group of reports in VAERS with 86,891 PUBLISHED reports, and this constitutes a mere fraction of what CDC has actually received.
Before Covid-19 emerged in 2020, Harvard conducted a study in which it determined that less than 1% of actual adverse reactions following vaccination are ever reported to the CDC.
With accounts of drastic medical staff reductions and supposedly overwhelming numbers of Covid-19 cases to deal with, what are the chances that medical staff have time to report deaths to VAERS even if they wanted to?
Many deaths following vaccination, particularly in nursing homes, and being dismissed as Covid-19 deaths when there is no evidence to support it.
An impassioned CNA tending to the elderly made an impassioned plea for the public to wake up and realize the elderly are 'dropping like flies' in response to the vaccination. When many of his clients abruptly died following vaccination, his supervisor dismissed the deaths as the result of a 'super spreader' depiste offering zero evidence.
"Covid-19" and 'superspreader' are convenient, default excuses to dismiss the actual impacts the Covid 'vaccines' on the elderly. Statements by family or staff as to the vibrant quality of life enjoyed by the patient which ended abruptly when vaccinated are dismissed with words like, "He was old..." and "It was her time..."
A thread on FR details the many reasons why cause of death is often not investigated, despite all the 'rules' involved, and that such determinations are largely a bueurocrtaic decision.
A Covid Death? The Bureaucracy Decides (freerepublic.com)
With abrupt deaths dismissed as natural causes or 'too hard to tell' or 'not enough resources to find out,' how many of other patients just might be experiencing strokes following vaccination which are then attributed to age?
Here's a patient record of stroke in VAERS:
| 93 years old | 15-30 days after vaccination | 1204231-1 | Suffered from a stroke on 4/3/21 from a blood clot in his brain stem. Prior to vaccine he was healthy and 100% independent, still drove, did grocery shopping, yard work, etc. Now he cannot move his left side and was placed on hospice as he has lost his will to eat, drink, or live. |
The data set I pulled from VAERS included all records containing 'stroke in the event description. All records containing 'stroke' in the adverse event description are shown here (freerepublic.com).
Some instances wherein a physician typed 'stroke ruled out,' or other neutral reference, likely occurred but those records which I reviewed (approximately 200) did not have more than 2 examples of that notation.
Further, there are other medical terms for stroke which I did not include in my search so some records are missing there.
There are many examples like this in VAERS for all ages, but particularly among the elderly, in which the account goes something like, "He was fine until she got the vaccine...." or "She was active and when I left the room. she was working on her puzzles and I came back and she was gone..."
[Note: You may want to review the record of strokes reported following vaccination (Covid-19, VAERS) I posted to FR here. I believe you'll be struck, as I was, by the number of times you see that overall, onset is relatively soon after vaccination.]
Deaths and inujries from strokes in the vaccinated elderly are too rapidly ignored by the CDC and others. The CDC will swiftly declare cause of death 'Covid-19' based on supposition without testing, or with a positive Covid-19 within 60 days of death, but reported cases of abrupt stroke within days of vaccination are deemed impossible to determine and dismissed as irrelevent.
Why are there so many published reports of strokes for Covid-19 Vaccines in the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System? Here are the top 5 vaccines with the most published stroke records in VAERS.
886 of the total number of 2254 of adverse event description 'stroke' reported to VAERS are for Covid-19 'vaccines' (approx 5 records are not classified by manufacturer). That's 39% of all published reports of strokes for all vaccines in the VAERS database.
How can Covid-19 vaccination records amass 39% of event records with 'stroke' in 4 months of administration, even though VAERS is not publishing most of the Covid-19 vax reports it has received?
I routinely report on total deaths in VAERS, but it's clear upon reading the records that the medical staff often do not know what happens to their patient after transferred or discharged from the ER or facility. The deaths published in VAERS are likely unreliable and underreported.
The CDC is no longer making much effort to publish reports receives for Covid-19, but about a month ago, it was publishing 25% of them.
So the current count of 867 'stroke' references multiplied by a factor of (at extreme minium) 4 would yield 3,468 'stroke' instances reported to the CDC. This number is really too small because the CDC curtailed reporting and so the factor is now greater than 4. But let's work with 3468 'stroke' references for now.
Remember, less than 1% of vaccination adverse events was reported to VAERS before Covid-19 impacted staffing and resources. This likely means facilities said to be understaffed and overwhelmed are making a fraction of previous effort to report to VAERS now.
But let's use 1% to calculate how many strokes are likely occuring following vaccination to calculate how many strokes may be occurring following vaccination which are never reported to VAERS.
This could indicate, via very modest estimates, that 346,800 strokes overall following Covid-19 vaccinations.
I'm not saying the vaccinations are medically responsible, because no investigation has begun to gather any evidence that strokes are an issue at all. Since Fauci and 8 others at NIAID own patents in the Moderna vaccine, I don't believe any investigation will ever occur.
I'm not saying my estimates are not without error. The degree to which the CDC has decided not to spend money to hire data entry persons to update VAERS has no doubt contributed to the weaknesses of this kind of estimate. If the IRS 'fell behind' to the degree the CDC has 'fallen behind', I do believe the IRS would spend money on data entry resources to catch up, if only to collect taxe funds.
The CDC is verbose in its promises that when records of adverse events are received and reviewed, all necessary medical oversight occurs to determine if the events recorded have any bearing on the safety of the vaccine.
WHERE the CDC when it comes to strokes? Even f they disagree with my math, Covid-19 'vaccines' account for 39% of stroke records published in VAERS. The CDC knows its database is not up to date, and that many never report to VAERS.
I know. I know. I've been told many times that all untimely deaths are reported to VAERS or investigated (autopsy) by law, but it was not happening before, and it certainly isn't happening now (links above).
Personally I think my estimate of potentially 350,000 strokes occurring after Covid-19 vaccinations is both modest and defensible, given the circumstances. This estimate is meant to encompasses published, unpublished and unreported strokes following Covid-19 vaccination (e.g., 'he was old...'). Note that the CDC and others estimate that less than 800,000 strokes occur annually in the U.S.
How many would it take before the CDC takes an interest in finding out why published Covid vaccine adverse event reccords account for 36% of all strokes in VAER for all vaccines? Is the CDC interested in knowing that over 10% of all adverse event records (all symptoms) in VAERS are for Covid-19 vaccinations, or is that why the CDC curtailed publishing received reports in VAERS?
Forget the estimates and percentages. Is the existance of over 800 records with 'stroke' listed in the adverse events description getting ANY attention?
With no displayed interest in the records of strokes in VAERS for Covid-19 vaccines, I have little hope anyone will take an interest in the 747 records of anaphylaxis or any other significant injury. I suppose they don't want to contribute to 'vaccine hesitancy."
They are not really adverse effects but immune system responses. Almost all are what happens when your immune system starts acting whacky. The jabs interference with the smooth running of your immune system.
https://gab.com/Robert55/posts/106124367834051996
Very short news clip of a Freudian slip of the shot.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
HOW can that be an unrelated remark!? So did he voice is fears or the last company meeting notes!? Gah! Thank you for the link.
That is what Dr. Bill Gates keep saying for some reason. we will say NO, he doesn’t have a military to force the shots. All the money in the world will not get the entire worlds population to take an experimental drug/drugs.
Say NO to Drugs!!!!!!
False Association: VAERS reports are just reports of something that happened to someone after being vaccinated...no “time limit” I don’t think...probably usually 1 to 60 days I would imagine...but given the level of paranoia out there might be longer. 2,900 vaccinated people are dying every day...that will of course lead to many VAERS reports given the level of Internet dis-information out there.
VAERS reports in no way associate “side-effects”/deaths/other issues to the vaccines...they are intended for future study. And anyone (not just medical professionals) can make a VAERS report.
VAERS reports for the annual flu shot would be just as numerous as the COVID shot if everyone reported everything that happened to them after getting their annual flu shot, but people don’t do that. This is good fodder for a “psychological” “group-think” study.
I could not find a “time limit”:
https://vaers.hhs.gov/faq.html
Here’s the lancet article: meta-analysis of coof patients. IIRC most of them were hospitalized; and of course there is a certain incidence of DVT among those hospitalized for a long time (you’re not moving your legs; in addition to a certain subset of those patients, e.g. hip and knee replacements, who tend to get DVT anyway). It was not “out in the general public”.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30383-7/fulltext
But I’ve seen — forgot to save — a couple of articles from India and China, of patients who presented with DVT, who upon examination had the characteristic ground-glass on lung X-rays, yet had never manifested pulmonary symptoms.
To your point, Cathi posted this a few days ago, touching on the vaccine not all staying locally at the injection site, but disseminating throughout the body (in test animals, namely mice):
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3951851/posts
which linked to
https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n958/rr-1
This is one such article on thrombosis as a side effect of the injections.
(But there are earlier articles which talk about clotting as a manifestation of the coof, even before vaccinations were being pushed):
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378457/
why should anyone believe anything that the cdc, fauxi, and the scientific community says about a so called “deadly virus” when they refuse to speak up about the dangers of our feral government opening the border, inviting, and then distributing thousands of disease carrying invaders across our country during a so called “global pandemic”???...
An interesting article; I will study it. At a glance it fits well with what I know of the mRNA vaccines but goes farther to explain in more detail the vaccines' efficacy and how that works.
OTOH, if, as some speculate, the vaccines have a more sinister purpose, such as population control, I would expect the NYT to be all in on a deception. I wonder how many at the NYT have taken the mRNA vaccines.
Far behind? My arse. They are a politicized operation and will operate in only the interests of the ruling parties.
You want truth? You won’t be getting it from this government.
I sure don’t. Two of the reasons are 1) they still can’t even determine where it supposedly came from, probably because they played a part in it’s creation, and 2) they keep trying to convince us their experimental injections are quote “vaccines” when they aren’t actual vaccines, which is proven by their demand you continue to wear a mask (which doesn’t work either).
Not much of anything they say appears honest to me. It appears to all be about dumbing us down (if not killing us) while making them rich.
For God’s sake. Give it a rest. People report it right after the shots.
This shot is experimental for a reason. There is no liability to the makers for a reason. Experiments are just that. It means there is going to be a lot to learn. It is just sad it is done on a massive scale and treatments for the virus are almost forbidden. That is an abomination and that is a crime against humanity.
For that, you'd have to find out what was done to the (say) Pfizer or JNJ adenovirus vectors; and the details of how viruses share/trade genetic info.
Xactly!
BTTT
I totally agree. I’ve even taken a permanent hard split from Trump over this, as he appears complicit.
The phony “vaccines” don’t stop you from catching it, and aren’t even needed as this new flu (all it really is) has a 99+% survival rate.
I know many elderly that tested positive but had no real effect at all, other than fear.
I refuse to submit to their psychological warfare, or their injections. In fact, I just made that my new tagline.
My friend had some bad reactions and was unsuccessful at trying to report them.
She gave up as many others probably have. Many doctors don’t want to treat these effects seriously. I imagine they feel the liability will end up in their laps. Who knows?
Yep - VAERS is “a system” that depends on others passing on info which may or may not be accurate and which acknowledges there’s generally no actual proof of much of anything and that it probably only receives a small percentage of incidents that might - or might not have anything to do with anything.
IOW, VAERS keeps some folks employed by its efficacy as a useful tool is highly suspect.
This is evidence enough not to trust a word they say at this point.
Bob, you should be aware that this wasn’t the personal experience of Cathi. This was pulled from an anonymous blog on the Internet. Specifically here: https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2021/04/the-cdcs-vaers-and-vaccine-complications-the-system-is-broken.html
I don’t know anything about the website, but I do know that from reading the post that it’s an anonymous person claiming to be a doctor claiming to have a story about a patient who has died. That’s not to say it’s necessarily false, but it deserves the same level of credence as any media story where “anonymous sources are telling us...”.
You’re free to make up your own mind, but I wanted to make sure you had all the information and were aware this was NOT a first-hand account. This is copied and pasted from an anonymous Internet blog.
VAERS includes codes for broken hips. Do you think vaccines cause hip bones to spontaneously snap?
VAERS is an EVENT reporting system. It’s there so you can report any adverse event that takes place, regardless of whether the vaccine had anything to do with it because with all those reports, you can apply statistical models to find unexpected patterns that may indicate an actual problem worth investigating. It’s there to find that one-in-a-million set of circumstances that leads to a bad reaction that nobody would otherwise be aware of. VAERS reports were NEVER intended to be taken as gospel. The people who operate VAERS tell you that directly, all over the VAERS website: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.