Posted on 04/25/2021 8:08:42 PM PDT by ransomnote
The CDC is far behind in publishing reports of adverse events it receives. As of April 6, only 25% of actual reports of adverse events were available in VAERS. In the past month as rate of vaccination increased, the CDC drastically reduced the rate that it now publishes received reports. This means that there may be at minimum four times the number of strokes published in VAERS already reported to the CDC.
Even though the CDC is underreporting adverse events for Covid-19 'vaccines' by simply not publishing them, the remaining reports which are published already account 11% of all adverse events in (30+ years of) VAERS after just 4 months of 'vaccine's' administration.
The Covid-19 vaccines are the 2nd largest group of reports in VAERS with 86,891 PUBLISHED reports, and this constitutes a mere fraction of what CDC has actually received.
Before Covid-19 emerged in 2020, Harvard conducted a study in which it determined that less than 1% of actual adverse reactions following vaccination are ever reported to the CDC.
With accounts of drastic medical staff reductions and supposedly overwhelming numbers of Covid-19 cases to deal with, what are the chances that medical staff have time to report deaths to VAERS even if they wanted to?
Many deaths following vaccination, particularly in nursing homes, and being dismissed as Covid-19 deaths when there is no evidence to support it.
An impassioned CNA tending to the elderly made an impassioned plea for the public to wake up and realize the elderly are 'dropping like flies' in response to the vaccination. When many of his clients abruptly died following vaccination, his supervisor dismissed the deaths as the result of a 'super spreader' depiste offering zero evidence.
"Covid-19" and 'superspreader' are convenient, default excuses to dismiss the actual impacts the Covid 'vaccines' on the elderly. Statements by family or staff as to the vibrant quality of life enjoyed by the patient which ended abruptly when vaccinated are dismissed with words like, "He was old..." and "It was her time..."
A thread on FR details the many reasons why cause of death is often not investigated, despite all the 'rules' involved, and that such determinations are largely a bueurocrtaic decision.
A Covid Death? The Bureaucracy Decides (freerepublic.com)
With abrupt deaths dismissed as natural causes or 'too hard to tell' or 'not enough resources to find out,' how many of other patients just might be experiencing strokes following vaccination which are then attributed to age?
Here's a patient record of stroke in VAERS:
| 93 years old | 15-30 days after vaccination | 1204231-1 | Suffered from a stroke on 4/3/21 from a blood clot in his brain stem. Prior to vaccine he was healthy and 100% independent, still drove, did grocery shopping, yard work, etc. Now he cannot move his left side and was placed on hospice as he has lost his will to eat, drink, or live. |
The data set I pulled from VAERS included all records containing 'stroke in the event description. All records containing 'stroke' in the adverse event description are shown here (freerepublic.com).
Some instances wherein a physician typed 'stroke ruled out,' or other neutral reference, likely occurred but those records which I reviewed (approximately 200) did not have more than 2 examples of that notation.
Further, there are other medical terms for stroke which I did not include in my search so some records are missing there.
There are many examples like this in VAERS for all ages, but particularly among the elderly, in which the account goes something like, "He was fine until she got the vaccine...." or "She was active and when I left the room. she was working on her puzzles and I came back and she was gone..."
[Note: You may want to review the record of strokes reported following vaccination (Covid-19, VAERS) I posted to FR here. I believe you'll be struck, as I was, by the number of times you see that overall, onset is relatively soon after vaccination.]
Deaths and inujries from strokes in the vaccinated elderly are too rapidly ignored by the CDC and others. The CDC will swiftly declare cause of death 'Covid-19' based on supposition without testing, or with a positive Covid-19 within 60 days of death, but reported cases of abrupt stroke within days of vaccination are deemed impossible to determine and dismissed as irrelevent.
Why are there so many published reports of strokes for Covid-19 Vaccines in the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System? Here are the top 5 vaccines with the most published stroke records in VAERS.
886 of the total number of 2254 of adverse event description 'stroke' reported to VAERS are for Covid-19 'vaccines' (approx 5 records are not classified by manufacturer). That's 39% of all published reports of strokes for all vaccines in the VAERS database.
How can Covid-19 vaccination records amass 39% of event records with 'stroke' in 4 months of administration, even though VAERS is not publishing most of the Covid-19 vax reports it has received?
I routinely report on total deaths in VAERS, but it's clear upon reading the records that the medical staff often do not know what happens to their patient after transferred or discharged from the ER or facility. The deaths published in VAERS are likely unreliable and underreported.
The CDC is no longer making much effort to publish reports receives for Covid-19, but about a month ago, it was publishing 25% of them.
So the current count of 867 'stroke' references multiplied by a factor of (at extreme minium) 4 would yield 3,468 'stroke' instances reported to the CDC. This number is really too small because the CDC curtailed reporting and so the factor is now greater than 4. But let's work with 3468 'stroke' references for now.
Remember, less than 1% of vaccination adverse events was reported to VAERS before Covid-19 impacted staffing and resources. This likely means facilities said to be understaffed and overwhelmed are making a fraction of previous effort to report to VAERS now.
But let's use 1% to calculate how many strokes are likely occuring following vaccination to calculate how many strokes may be occurring following vaccination which are never reported to VAERS.
This could indicate, via very modest estimates, that 346,800 strokes overall following Covid-19 vaccinations.
I'm not saying the vaccinations are medically responsible, because no investigation has begun to gather any evidence that strokes are an issue at all. Since Fauci and 8 others at NIAID own patents in the Moderna vaccine, I don't believe any investigation will ever occur.
I'm not saying my estimates are not without error. The degree to which the CDC has decided not to spend money to hire data entry persons to update VAERS has no doubt contributed to the weaknesses of this kind of estimate. If the IRS 'fell behind' to the degree the CDC has 'fallen behind', I do believe the IRS would spend money on data entry resources to catch up, if only to collect taxe funds.
The CDC is verbose in its promises that when records of adverse events are received and reviewed, all necessary medical oversight occurs to determine if the events recorded have any bearing on the safety of the vaccine.
WHERE the CDC when it comes to strokes? Even f they disagree with my math, Covid-19 'vaccines' account for 39% of stroke records published in VAERS. The CDC knows its database is not up to date, and that many never report to VAERS.
I know. I know. I've been told many times that all untimely deaths are reported to VAERS or investigated (autopsy) by law, but it was not happening before, and it certainly isn't happening now (links above).
Personally I think my estimate of potentially 350,000 strokes occurring after Covid-19 vaccinations is both modest and defensible, given the circumstances. This estimate is meant to encompasses published, unpublished and unreported strokes following Covid-19 vaccination (e.g., 'he was old...'). Note that the CDC and others estimate that less than 800,000 strokes occur annually in the U.S.
How many would it take before the CDC takes an interest in finding out why published Covid vaccine adverse event reccords account for 36% of all strokes in VAER for all vaccines? Is the CDC interested in knowing that over 10% of all adverse event records (all symptoms) in VAERS are for Covid-19 vaccinations, or is that why the CDC curtailed publishing received reports in VAERS?
Forget the estimates and percentages. Is the existance of over 800 records with 'stroke' listed in the adverse events description getting ANY attention?
With no displayed interest in the records of strokes in VAERS for Covid-19 vaccines, I have little hope anyone will take an interest in the 747 records of anaphylaxis or any other significant injury. I suppose they don't want to contribute to 'vaccine hesitancy."
Freepers, quit making excuses and man up. Get your shots!
————
Got mine, but hey, if you get a stroke or some other side effect, tough titty, right?
Well, the jabs instruct the cells to make copies of the spike protein. Do ALL copies obediently go into the cell membrane and protrude through the surface? Or do any of them get loose?
Beloved young teacher I know has had a stroke post vaccine. I’m sure it’s just coincidental. But I doubt her students will be lining up for their turn.
I thought you were speaking of your own experience.
“My bad”, as they say.
Extremely disturbing. The one thing that confronts my thoughts is that a new type of administration is now in control of events and if their reaction to the humanitarian disaster on the southern border is any indication - well, we appear to be cannon fodder in their minds. Same goes for China and international relations... either they want war, submission or they are incapable of comprehending their duties and responsibilities.
Well the one thing it should tell anyone for sure, Bob, is to ignore the nonsense repeated postings of the CDC/VAERS disclaimer.
You are past my ken here, GW; the mRNA vaccine strands generate some SARS-CoV-2 characteristics in order to stimulate antibodies but does the vaccine reproduce the whole virus and all of it's spike proteins? I don't know about that nor whether it weakly duplicates the complete viral infection. That is not my (limited) understanding.
Do you think anyone is monitoring and cataloging this new mRNA technology and it's therapeutic ramifications? Anyone other than the pharmaceutical creators with their proprietary considerations?
No, I don’t think anyone is monitoring or cataloging any of the covid vaccine data. That would be the job of the CDC/FDA and they have been conspicuously missing in action. They are months behind in even looking at it and when they do look at a “signal” they conclude that there is no evidence to prove the vaccine caused it.
My joke about that has been that they wouldn’t see vaccine involvement even if a vaccine jumped out of a dead body and yelled, “IT WAS ME!!! IT WAS ME!!! :-)
On the other hand, scientist and university researchers have been attempting to drill down and discover the actual processes behind some of these new morbidities. The Germans did a great job in unraveling the VITT AZ/J&J syndrome.
I’ve had some issues and am seeing a vascular surgeon, my friend had a stroke, my son-in-law’s father had a stroke.
Tested for what? Antibodies to the rona? As with every other bug, the antibodies peter out after a short time, 2-3 months in the case of the China flu.
There’s a test for memory T cells, but it’s not widely available. So it’s not clear to me what the point of testing is.
Help me out here though. Why do you refer to this as the “so-called” vaccine? I’ve seen that reference, but I don’t understand why people think that the mRNA vax isn’t a “real” vaccine. Can you explain that to me?
I thought you were speaking of your own experience, not quoting some click-bait blog, so I gave you credence.
“My bad”, as they say.
I would say that’s up to the individual’s judgment. Personally, I couldn’t care less if someone decides for or against taking this vax. None of my business. I’m happy to have a choice though.
Do I need to get another MMR? Polio vax?
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/health/pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine.html
NY Times is part of the Deep State; they’re not going to be lying about it in order to trash the jab.
NYT is the Pravda of the Deep State.
So if they say the "vaccines" tell the body to make spike protein, it's close enough for laypeople, as to what the DeepState wants people to think.
You are seeming blind to the end result of following your attitude.
Someone who expects to have incontrovertible iron clad proof before exercising caution is dangerous and completely removed from the scientific method. Someone who needs to see bodies and expects side effects to be labeled rather than just following the administration of a drug will be shutting the door after all the livestock have departed.
Shame on you for ignoring the morbidity & mortality that exceeds all other vaccines in a short period of time and haranguing those who even mention the incidents.
Furthermore, VAERS transmits its vaccine adverse event reports to the Uppsala Monitoring Center, the World Health Organization collaborating center for international drug and vaccine safety monitoring [4,5], in order to contribute to the global pharmacovigilance effort along with other countries that employ passive vaccine safety monitoring systems. VAERS data must be interpreted with caution due to the inherent limitations of passive surveillance. VAERS is primarily a safety signal detection and hypothesis generating system…
Garbage out...
It turns out that Viscount Ridley’s line of questioning was correct all along. The Uppsala adaptation of Ferguson’s model not only projected exaggerated death tolls in Sweden. Ferguson’s own projections for Sweden advanced similar numbers, all wildly off the mark from what happened...
...Just over one year ago, the epidemiology modeling of Neil Ferguson and Imperial College played a preeminent role in shutting down most of the world. The exaggerated forecasts of this modeling team are now impossible to downplay or deny, and extend to almost every country on earth. Indeed, they may well constitute one of the greatest scientific failures in modern human history.
Sounds like a fair amount of conspiring has been goin on, eh what?
Does the virus itself cause similar issues with iron/ferritin?
The Lancet reports 20% or more of COVID patients have Deep Vein Thrombosis (most often in the legs; the risk is breakaway clots which travel to the lungs or brain).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am beginning to think that publications like the lancet have been releasing reports re Covid and DVT because they want an excuse for the vaccine’s DVT. So far, Covid-19 looks like pneumonia and flu untreated because once misdiagnosed as Covid-19, you don’t get any treatment until treatment constitutes a respirator in a hospital.
So by saying Covid has the effects of the vaccine, anyone with DVD ‘must ‘a been asymptomatic for Covid’ *wink*.
The DNA types (adenovirus ‘vaccines’ J&J and Astrazeneca) were theoretically capable of making those vaccines airborne.
The adenovirus is, among other things (bat), a cold virus which is highly communicable (airborne). So the theory is, they crippled it long enough to get it into cells, where they tell you it will stay. But as cold viruses are common, then mixing of genetic material between highly communicable adenovirus and ‘cripple’ adeno virus occurs and now that Vax is on the move.
That might explain why some unvaccinated women are experiencing reproductive symptoms common to vaccinated women.
I just find it strange that there are no isolated samples of Covid-19 virus (Yes, I know, there shall be screaming) and no one used it to create the ‘vaccines’ that somehow now the Covid-19 virus supposedly has the attributes of the vax. Hmmmm....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.