Posted on 04/22/2021 5:16:46 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson
A gentleman who left Washington at half past four o'clock on Saturday morning, informs us that the general belief in that city in the best informed circles, was that JEFFERSON DAVIS was on his way North--at the head of a considerable force, which he was augmenting on the way. As all communication by telegraph with the South has been cut off, it was impossible to procure any positive information on this subject; but it was considered beyond dispute that he was en route for the Capital and not very far from it at the present time.
Our informant states that the railroad bridge at Canton, two or three miles out of Baltimore, on the road to Washington, was burning as he came through, and that the telegraph wires were also destroyed at that place. Baltimore, he states, seemed to be in a perfect whirlwind of excitement. Thousands of people thronged the streets, who appeared to have lost all control of themselves, and were more like fiends than human beings. At that time the military and police had not, apparently, established any authority over the city. At 1 o'clock our informant left Baltimore by a propeller through the Elkton Canal. He met two barges, which seemed to be filled with troops, though not many were visible, as they were all housed. The captains of the barges, on being hailed, denied that they had troops on board, but the gentlemen on the propeller were confident from what they heard that there were not less than 1,700, and that they were of the Pennsylvania Volunteers.
The road from Philadelphia to Baltimore is completely interrupted, no trains passing over it at all.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
But the revisionist argument of slavery was on the way out'' fly's in the face of the simple fact of history you Rebs are either unable or unwilling to face. > The South went to war to preserve it. And expand it if it won.
Your map is inaccurate.
It should show, but does not, slavery in:
And then there were the hopes & plans of Southern adventurers known as "Filibusters" of the Golden Circle:
“But the revisionist argument of slavery was on the way out’’ fly’s in the face of the simple fact of history . . .”
It doesn’t appear you fully understand the importance of the Florida Supreme Court’s 1860 ruling in Cato a Slave, vs. The State.
You don't seem to understand April 9, 1865.
I guess right about now you would rather write about anything other than “Cato a Slave, vs. The State.”
Please explain - in your own words - what you were taught in school about that case?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.