Posted on 04/16/2021 9:35:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
In a move much like the European nations who halted the distribution of the Astra-Zeneca vaccine, the Food and Drug Administration called for an immediate halt to the rollout of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. This came after it was reported that six women between the ages of 18 and 48 reported blood clots and one died, after taking the vaccine.
The move is odd. General reactions from social media are memes about the J&J vaccine’s supposed inferiority and skepticism of what is really going on with this particular vaccine. Many believe that there may be a coverup at works. While this may be true, a baser motivation may provide a better explanation for these events.
The Johnson & Johnson vaccine is reported to have had six cases of thrombosis (blood clots), according to CDC data provided through the Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting System (VAERS). This is the same amount as is being reported in association with the FDA’s announcement. The problem is both ModeRNA and Pfizer have far more reported cases of thrombosis.
Currently the total is 111 reported cases of thrombosis in America with the vaccine, per VAERS data. It’s becomes reasonable to speculate that blood clots are not the real reason that the FDA has turned on this particular vaccine. 64 cases have been reported in association with the Pfizer vaccine and 41 cases have been reported with ModeRNA, though these cases on average seem more severe than that of Pfizer.
It’s not about safety
What’s clear is that there is an ulterior motive behind the Federal government’s change of heart. In total, Johnson & Johnson have vaccinated over 7.2 million people. Their vaccine only requires one dose and is probably has the most honest advertisement of any vaccine. My own preliminary review of the VAERS data would seem to indicate that Johnson and Johnson produced the safest vaccine of the three companies and ModeRNA produced the deadliest cocktail.
Total depravity is always at play. While Johnson & Johnson is no angel, they are stepping to a major player in Pfizer, the most well-known Big Pharma corporation. It is far more likely the government is picking winners and losers with regards to the vaccine than caring for the health and safety of its citizens. The federal government has acted in the interest of Big Pharma over science.
After all inexpensive treatment options for COVID-19 were discouraged in favor of the vaccine, ventilators, and Remdesivir. Given the lack of data to support the FDA’s guidance and its history of corruption, Occam’s Razor would indicate crony capitalism is at play.
Additionally, Pfizer waited to release their data until 6 days after the "election." That data might have given hope to those terrified by covid. They influenced the "election."
“...My own preliminary review of the VAERS data would seem to indicate that Johnson and Johnson produced the safest vaccine of the three companies and ModeRNA produced the deadliest cocktail....”
****************************************************************
Right. I really believe the “analysis” of some random guy on the internet. This “random guy” clearly doesn’t understand that VAERS is meant to generate leads to further investigation. You know, investigation that can include interviews of treating physicians and review of actual medical records by COMPETENT medical staff.
The good news is that if you go to the linked site of “random guy” you will find pleadings for donations. Hey, random guys gotta eat too!
Thanks! That’s what I needed.
Either politics or the right people weren’t making the money. It’s hard to tell these days. They are so closely tied together.
“What’s the rate of thrombosis per vaccination?”
Bingo!
Although the other vaccines have more Thrombolytic events after vaccination in VAERS, they also have given many many more doses.
When you look at the rate per vaccination, they are all in the same ball park - about the same as the background rate among the population, when you account for age and gender.
It does look like Fauci, and the several other top NIAID officials who have large personal financial interests in Moderna, are once again slanting the playing field against competitors.
“What’s an acceptable number of vaccine-related deaths to incur for a disease that has a survival rate of over 98%...”
Ok. Over 98% survival, let’s call it 99%
That’s 1% death rate. The answer to your question would thus be less than 1% - in other words better than non-vaccinated.
This article yesterday
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3951063/posts
Reported 74 people have died and 78 million have been “fully vaccinated”.
That is a rate of 74/78,000,000 which is about 0.0001%
So we have 1% (your number) vs 0.0001%.
So the improvement (decrease in death rate) is about ten thousand fold.
Is that acceptable?
If I ran Johnson & Johnson, I’d have investigators checking into industrial sabotage. Yes, industrial sabotage does exist. Pfizer and Moderna each have the means and the motives as does the corrupt CDC. I’m not saying that sabotage is what happened, but it is worth investigating.
Or perhaps J&J simply did not pay off the necessary bribes to the Zhou Baiden perfectly legitimate government that won the most safest and honest election in world history. (Is a /sarc tag needed?)
What’s the rate of thrombosis per vaccination?
What’s the rate of severe reaction per vaccination?
What’s the rate of death per vaccination?
What’s the rate of hospitalization per vaccination?
All good questions, maybe Dr. Fauxi can provide the answers.
It's not like the democrat propaganda news media will be asking anytime soon.
I think so. Wasn’t the J&J vaccine the single shot. If so it would explain why. There is money being made for every shot. If you need 2 shots it’s twice the money.
We previously proposed a likely mechanism that the genetic CoViD-19 vaccines may directly infect platelets and megakaryocytes triggering mRNA translation and consequent spike protein synthesis intracellularly. This may potentially result in an autoimmune response against platelets and megakaryocytes resulting in reticuloendothelial phagocytosis and direct CD8+ T cell lysis [10-11]. The consequent thrombocytopaenia may lead to internal bleeding and spontaneous blood clots.
We, therefore, proposed that CoViD genetic vaccines may have a direct role in spurring autoimmune response against platelets that may clinically manifest in vaccine-induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia (VIPIT).
As of 14th March 2021, MHRA Yellow Cards data suggested that there has been a total of ~205 thrombotic events (12 fatal) reported with Ox/AZ CoViD vaccine and ~71 (1 fatal) with Pfizer CoViD vaccine.
A further 161 thrombotic events are recorded in the VAERS database in the United States with Pfizer and Moderna CoViD Vaccines as of 24th March 2021. Moreover, MHRA has reported 267 total bleeding events (6 fatal) with CoViD Vaccine AstraZeneca and 220 events (9 fatal) with Pfizer CoViD Vaccine.
Another 439 bleeding events are recorded in VAERS in the USA with Pfizer and Moderna CoViD vaccines. For thrombocytopenia, there are about 60 cases (2 fatal) or 34 cases (1 fatal) reported in the UK with AstraZeneca or Pfizer CoViD vaccines respectively, with another 105 cases of thrombocytopenia reported in the United States with Pfizer and Moderna Vaccines.
It is plausible that the post-vaccination acute phase response may increase the risk of spontaneous clotting, perhaps similar to disseminated intravascular coagulation. This will in turn lead to reduced platelets and risk of bleeding in some individuals. Moreover, rare subjects with post-vaccination immune thrombocytopenia, are likely to be at increased risk of fatal thrombotic events.
https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n883/rr-1
Only 6% of Covid deaths had no other comorbidity per CDC statements last year. I have not heard of them walking that back.
Death Certificate–Based ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes for COVID-19 Mortality Surveillance — United States, January–December 2020
During 2020, approximately 375,000 U.S. deaths were attributed to COVID-19.
Among 378,048 death certificates from 2020 listing COVID-19, 5.5% listed COVID-19 without codes for any other conditions. Among 357,133 death certificates with at least one other condition, 97% had a co-occurring diagnosis of a plausible chain-of-event condition (e.g., pneumonia or respiratory failure), or a significant contributing condition (e.g., hypertension or diabetes), or both.
These findings support the accuracy of COVID-19 mortality surveillance in the United States using official death certificates. High-quality documentation of death certificate diagnoses is essential for an authoritative public record.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7014e2.htm
________________
Less than 1% of America’s population lives in long-term-care facilities, but as of March 4, 2021, this tiny fraction of the country accounts for 34% of US COVID-19 deaths.
https://covidtracking.com/nursing-homes-long-term-care-facilities
J&J is a DNA induced spike.
Whrt happens to the Novavax vaccine? It is a traditionally produced vaccine (derived from a moth virus) that has a 90% effective rate and only needs refrigeration for long-term storage.
uh nope....
Over 189 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through April 12, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 3,005 reports of death (0.00158%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. CDC and FDA physicians review each case report of death as soon as notified and CDC requests medical records to further assess reports.
Yes. But your response is non-sequitur.
You need to read what was being discussed.
Just correcting data....didn’t mean to interrupt. Carry on.
RE: What happens to the Novavax vaccine
Expecting approval in the summer of this year.
That is standard procedure for patients presenting with chest pains in ERs. Hospitals that fail to adhere to that protocol have higher fatality rates.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.