Posted on 04/15/2021 7:25:16 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
Can anyone provide the stats on flu deaths (prior to the scamdemic) ? I apologize..I don’t even know where to look at this point.
In before the flat earthers.
I’m sorry...but the image is so large that it is cut off by the side bar. Is there a way you can decrease the size?
nevermind
do we have a similar chart for covid?
https://i.imgur.com/00fSIszl.jpg
That is startling. From day one, in China, it was presumed and measured (also in the US early 2020) that 80% of deaths were 65+.
Those numbers say 67%. So 33% younger. Not 20%.
Behold, mutation.
Behold, mutation.
~~~~~~~~
I don’t believe it was mutation. Just my 2 cents.
Ordinarily if you get sick, you get medicine, so we don’t know the stats for illnesses if you are denied all medications and they just wait for you to get so sick you need a ventilator, or you get better.
So persons with compromised immune systems who ordinarily would have received early treatment, or prophylactic treatment, were denied all treatment and hence, the higher death rate among the young. As I said, just my 2.
Check out Michigan’s graphs. Gretchen Whitmer’s actions as governor have come home to roost. “I think what’s happening now is she is realizing that she has lost the goodwill of the people,” said State Representative Jack O’Malley, a Republican.
With 7,200 new cases are being reported each day, Michigan is experiencing a seven-fold increase since late February. And 16 of the 20 metro areas with the country’s highest recent case rates are in Michigan.
Nod. The problem with your scenario is that it was so last year, too, when 80/20 was being measured. Additionally, your scenario would apply mostly to old folks, who go to the doc for medicine more often.
This 67/33 mix is ominous.
Nod. The problem with your scenario is that it was so last year, too, when 80/20 was being measured. Additionally, your scenario would apply mostly to old folks, who go to the doc for medicine more often.
This 67/33 mix is ominous.
~~~~~~
Everything I’ve looked at dismisses the ‘natural variant’ theory with one theoretical exception, which I think was centered on the Aztrazeneca/J&J’s . At best I’ve seen research that says the virus can upload (imprint, be transcribed) onto the DNA of the recipient. Also, there was a tweak, gain of function so some say we’re looking at more than one engineered version.
But comments about about variants are mixed, tending to describe loss of function, with perhaps the exception of Vanden Bossche.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
