Posted on 04/13/2021 7:26:35 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
What’s the definition of a “case”?
A person with a covid infection. Don’t you get tired of always asking the same irrelevant questions
It’s funny. You do a great job presenting the data. You have a gaggle of stalkers as well that have no purpose other than trying to disrupt conversation
It must be sad to limit be able to engage in intellectual debate like the antivaxxer anti science crowd
COVID-19 Vaccinations in the United States
CDC |Data as of: Apr 13 2021 6:00am ET | Posted: Apr 13 2021 12:25PM ET
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations
People Vaccinated
At Least One Dose
Total
122,295,530
% of Total Population
36.8%
Fully Vaccinated
75,322,283
%
22.7%
Population ≥ 18 Years of Age
At Least One Dose
121,376,367
% of Population ≥ 18 Years of Age
47%
Fully Vaccinated
75,117,813
%
29.1%
Population ≥ 65 Years of Age
At Least One Dose
43,293,678
% of Population ≥ 65 Years of Age
79.2%
Fully Vaccinated
34,161,828
%
62.5%
Ovarian vein thrombosis after coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection in a pregnant woman: case report
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32514763/
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and COVID-19: an overlooked female patient population at potentially higher risk during the COVID-19 pandemic
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32664957/
Impact of COVID-19 on female fertility:
a systematic review and meta-analysis
protocol
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/11/2/e045524.full.pdf?with-ds=yes
Male Fertility and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review of the Literature
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32814369/
Fertility is likely to decline in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, a new study finds
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-fertility-decline-covid-pandemic.html
COVID-19 could cause male infertility - new Israeli study
https://www.jpost.com/health-science/covid-19-could-cause-infertility-new-israeli-study-644767
A comprehensive review of the impact of COVID-19 on human reproductive biology, assisted reproduction care and pregnancy: a Canadian perspective
https://ovarianresearch.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13048-020-00737-1
Blood cell damage in COVID-19 may compromise oxygen transport
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200701/Blood-cell-damage-in-COVID-19-may-compromise-oxygen-transport.aspx
Right Ovarian Vein Thrombosis in the Setting of COVID-19 Infection
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33628665/
Anyone who has a cold or flu
Good enough for me! I trust these individuals over FRAUDci, or any gov't entity.
"A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described."
Do you have proof that it does not?
"No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report."
Again....DO YOU HAVE PROOF that it was NOT??
See how that works?
So, please stop spamming with your anti-VAERS nonsense. These medical professionals and private citizens should be trusted as much, or more, than FRAUDci, FDA, CDC or any other gov't, or BigPharma group.
TIA.
I ask because I have seen the definition of a case as such: "An instance of disease with its attendant circumstances." If you don't have attendant circumstances and just a positive test result do you actually have a case?
I see you have used the dog whistle to summon the disruption.
Your argument is antithetical to logic. The VAERS database specifically states that there is no requirement for causation. This is the fundamental premise. Your argument is but what is does not exclude causation is completely irrelevant
The fact is that VAERS is an unconfirmed database. It accepts incodormed reports. It is like an online poll.
So please understand that your insistence to prove that it is not true is a false argument and illogical at best. Prove pink elephants don’t exist. Toj can’t? Then they must exist. This is the intellectual fire power of your argument. It gets tiring to deal with the lack of logic and intellectual pursuit that your side is the equation insists upon
Good night.
Not sure how this is an irrelevant question when the graph and number of “cases” are being listed. I just want to know what is the definition of “case” that is being referenced.
They would probably be in denial decades ago when smallpox and polio were still around.
I think you ask a fair question. Please allow me to give an analogy. The test used for heart attacks is troponin. In the evening thst there is troponin isoenzyme in the blood is is demonstrative of myocardial cellular death which is the definition of myocardial infarction
Troponin has become so sensitive that modest elevations diagnose MI but so sensitively that the question becomes how relevant is it. I would argue that the supercharged cycles of PCR assay are finding positive infections that are so minute that it is too sensitive a measure.
What is the definition of a case? Depends on whom you ask. An epidemiologist will tell you any person wirh a positive PCR is a case. This is the reason that medical testing is to be judicious and answer a question. The problem is we fell in the trap of allowing anyone to be tested at will. This does not paint a fair picture id the actual disease
I think a case should be defined as symptomatic with a positive test.
LOL....no dog whistle. That is YOUR area of expertise.
VEARS is made up of medical professionals, and private individuals, who otherwise have no other mechanism/avenue to report what they are seeing, first hand.
You have a good night, too.
Funny how when side effects are legitimately tied to a vaccine, even if it’s literally 1 in a million like the J&J and AZ vaccines, action is taken to stop distribution and issue warnings. Of course this is exactly the opposite of what the antivaxxers claim is happening. Reality vs fantasy.
What question have I asked that would be disrupting any conversation?
I asked the question to start the conversation but you are calling people names and complaining about the lack of intellectual debate.
Also, if a Freeper posts the same article or source everyday with updated numbers and if we see said article everyday we can't comment on it or we considered are stalkers? Wouldn't you be a stalker too if you are on this daily posting frequently?
I think you are correct. Now this begs the question - are the numbers in this source where it says "number of new cases" - are these cases defined as symptomatic with a positive test or just positive test? This is an important distinction in order to get to the truth of the spread of COVID and to apply whatever protocols in order to deal with it in a positive manner.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.