I see you have used the dog whistle to summon the disruption.
Your argument is antithetical to logic. The VAERS database specifically states that there is no requirement for causation. This is the fundamental premise. Your argument is but what is does not exclude causation is completely irrelevant
The fact is that VAERS is an unconfirmed database. It accepts incodormed reports. It is like an online poll.
So please understand that your insistence to prove that it is not true is a false argument and illogical at best. Prove pink elephants don’t exist. Toj can’t? Then they must exist. This is the intellectual fire power of your argument. It gets tiring to deal with the lack of logic and intellectual pursuit that your side is the equation insists upon
Good night.
LOL....no dog whistle. That is YOUR area of expertise.
VEARS is made up of medical professionals, and private individuals, who otherwise have no other mechanism/avenue to report what they are seeing, first hand.
You have a good night, too.