Posted on 03/23/2021 6:51:43 AM PDT by Red Badger
The larger the ostensibly-important, "scientific" operation, the more mischief (See movie "Angels & Demons") and rituals that can be hidden within them.
re: “Cannot Be Explained by Our Current Laws of Nature”
CONTINUED refusal to apply such basic laws as Newton and Maxwell at the atomic level can LEAD TO such thinking ... instead, from 100 years ago Schrodinger is still invoked.
Want to read the alternative? Look up GUT-CP. Its the theory behind the a priori ‘prediction’ that the electron in the Hydrogen atom CAN BE brought to a _lower_ ‘orbital’ than the so-called “ground state” as defined by QM.
Want a quick intro? See this lecture by Prof Bakker:
Lecture begins at timestamp 04:30
http://webcast.massey.ac.nz/Mediasite/Play/8ef7e03e26fc458b8eb7f351738f26811d
Prof. Huub Bakker, a senior lecturer in engineering at Massey University, presented the following lecture on Randell Mills’ Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics (GUTCP). Prof. Tony Signal, representing the Physics Dept., responded with a critical view.
Prof. Bakker’s presentation is a survey of Mills’ 1800-page thesis and necessarily omits any deep analysis or mathematical proofs. Nevertheless, it is a fascinating introduction to the topic and he forcefully makes the point that Mills is either a fraud or the most gifted thinker of our time. According to Bakker, “there is no middle ground.”
More background, for interested parties: https://brilliantlightpower.fandom.com/wiki/BrilliantLightPower_Wiki
“But trans women are just as beautiful as CIS women, so why won’t CIS men date them?”
Er, possibly. Maybe not. The reality doesn’t meet the press releases.
I haven’t heard anyone refer to the bottom quark as the “beauty” quark in 20 years. What seems to be at issue the the completeness of the SU(2) symmetry that mixes neutrinos, electrons, up quarks, and down quarks based on 3 Standard Model groupings that increase in mass (electron, mu, tau) and the quarks (up, strange, top, down, charm, bottom). The SM is much more general and includes the U(1) symmetry (electromagnetism) and the SU(3) symmetry (color quarks). I doubt this structure is in question but there are always interesting nuances like parity conservation that crop up from time to time and must be resolved.
You object to trying to find out on this side of the divide?
We spend an awful lot of money keeping egg heads entertained.
I guess they didn’t get the memo that science is not to be challenged after “experts” declare their is no more debate.
how many genders does the Hadron Collider say we have?
Blatant rescue propaganda!
Right on schedule...
The closer one looks, the more the thinh disappears.
Reality is pixels, but the pixels are waves.
How very Hellenistic of you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.