A COMING COVID CATASTROPHE [PDF and 1-hour video interview with Geert Vanden Bossche]

Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD, DVM, is a vaccine research expert. He has a long list of companies and organizations he’s worked with on vaccine discovery and preclinical research, including GSK, Novartis, Solvay Biologicals, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Dr Vanden Bossche also coordinated the Ebola vaccine program at GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization).

Regarding the video at the FR link:
Apparently Del Bigtree who reviews portions of an interview with Vanden Bossche is anti-vax, but the subject of this video is the pro-vaccine industry expert/developer urging the halt of the administration of the Covid-19 vaccines.

For those who may not want to watch the video which is one hour in length, Vanden Bossche has provided the following notes and beneath it at the link is a 14 page infographic style PDF presentation.

Here's a direct link to the PDF presentation. I'll put the first page of the presentation, which is text, below the link.

I’ve attached the slides of the keynote that I held yesterday at the Vaccine Summit in Ohio (“Why should
current Covid-19 vaccines not be used for mass vaccination during a pandemic?”). Please do have a look
at them. The bottom-line is that I don’t see how mass vaccination campaigns would not lead to a
disastrous aggravation of the Covid-19 pandemic. However, no one else seems to realize; instead,
vaccinologists, clinicians and scientists are merely focusing on the (positive) short-term results and
impact at an individual level. Nobody seems to be looking at the consequences and risk at a human
population level (which, according to my understanding, will become manifest quite soon).

Why is nobody worried about ‘immune escape’ whereas Covid-19 has already escaped people’s innate
immunity as reflected by multiple emerging, much more infectious, viral variants (most likely due to the
global implementation of infection prevention measures)? Vaccine deployment in the ongoing mass
immunization campaigns are highly likely to further enhance (adaptive) immune escape as none of the
current vaccines will prevent replication/ transmission of viral variants. The more we use these vaccines
for immunizing people in the midst of a pandemic, the more infectious the virus will become. With
increasing infectiousness comes an increased likelihood of viral resistance to the vaccines. It's not exactly
rocket science, it’s a basic principle taught in a student’s first vaccinology class: One shouldn’t use a
prophylactic vaccine in populations exposed to high infectious pressure (which is now certainly the case
as multiple highly infectious variants are currently circulating in many parts of the world). To fully escape
selective immune pressure exerted by vaccinal antibodies, Covid-19, a highly mutable virus, only needs
to add another few mutations in its receptor-binding domain …

I am beyond worried about the disastrous impact this would have on our human ‘race’. Not only would
people lose vaccine-mediated protection but also their precious, variant-nonspecific (!), innate immunity
will be gone (this is because vaccinal antibodies outcompete natural antibodies for binding to Covid-19,
even when their affinity for the viral variant is relatively low).

I’ve alerted all responsible health and regulatory authorities, including WHO, CDC, FDA etc. and have
asked to consider my concern and to immediately open the discussion about the disastrous
consequences any further immune escape of Covid-19 would have.

I know, of course, that current mass vaccination campaigns enjoy vigorous and world-wide support from
a multitude of different parties/ stakeholders. However, unless I am proven wrong, this cannot be an
excuse for ignoring that mankind may currently be transforming a quite harmless virus into an
uncontrollable monster. I’ve never been that serious about a statement I made

Of 93 vaccines in the CDC's VAER database (voluntary reporting of adverse reactions), a specific Polio Vaccine developed in 2004 had more reported deaths. Then Pfizer and Moderna's Covid-19 deaths are next in magnitude, followed by PReVNAR 13, another Pfizer vaccine which was FDA Approved in February 24, 2010.

So about 1 month into release of the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 Vaccines, they are #2 and #3 on the list out of 93 Vaccines for reported deaths. The vaccine which was #1 in causing the most deaths had been in use since 2004. The vaccine ranked #4 in causing death had been in use since 2010.

NOte the reminder that reporting a death does not mean the vaccine caused the death. Tracking or reporting deaths or other reactions can eventually lead to analysis which point to problems with the vaccines or rule out the vaccine as the cause. But unfortunately many reports must be made first in order for a pattern to be detected, and then time spent being evaluated. :(

I started looking at this database after I found AmericanThinker's article on FR:

How safe are the COVID vaccines? Here is how COVID vaccines rank among 94 vaccine types in terms of reported post-vaccine adverse effects.
American Thinker ^ | 03/11/2021 | Randall Hoven

Posted on 3/11/2021, 7:22:38 AM by SeekAndFind

I believe as AmericanThinker has turned the light on the numbers, this database will soon be distorted. They may not be able to remove reported deaths (too conspicuous) but I suspect they may increase reported deaths for other vaccines. WE'll see if I am too cynical for my own good!

(h/t numberonepal for the meme below)

They have been rigorously tested and proved safe and effective. And, they have been approved by the FDA.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is a lie being parroted by the push-the-vaccine left.

The FDA never approved these experimental therapies.
For Reference, here's Wikipedia's definition of the EUA as opposed to FDA approval. Read it and learn.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Use_Authorization

"An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the United States is an authorization granted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under sections of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act as added to and amended by various Acts of Congress, including by the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of 2013 (PAHPRA), as codified by 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3, to allow the use of a drug prior to approval.^[1] It does not constitute approval of the drug in the full statutory meaning of the term, but instead authorizes FDA to facilitate availability of an unapproved product, or an unapproved use of an approved product, during a declared state of emergency from one of several agencies or of a "material threat" by the Secretary of Homeland Security.^[1]"

~~~

In 2019, when we had the opportunity to stop people from dying from Covid-19 by using HCQ, the Covid-19 industry banned it's use. HCQ HAS BEEN FULLY APPROVED by the FDA and had been used safely for 60 years for those suffering from illnesses like Lupus, but the Covid industry would not allow it to be used. They blocked doctors from prescribing it and blocked pharmacists from filling it - this was unprecedented because after FDA approval, doctors traditionally are allowed to write 'off label' prescriptions (use of an FDA approved drug for a illness not already formally identified as indicated).

They had no right to block it's use. If they were concerned about safety (which they were not), the FDA could have given HCQ an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) if they wanted to save lives because at the time, the Covid Industry was busy claiming there were no safe medications to treat Covid. All treatments were withheld until hospitalization was needed, and then it was ventilators. So an EUA would have given people suffering and dying of Covid a 'right to try' HCQ at their own risk. NOPE. The Covid Industry insisted people die instead of trying HCA.

Why? Because if HCQ and drugs like Ivermectin were permitted treatments - they couldn't be testing their experimental gene therapy products on the public now.

You see, they skipped full FDA approval and testing and instead they granted the vaccine companies Emergency Use Authorization. This is not 'approval' like that which HCQ went through, or the 60 years of experience we have with HCQ. The Covid vaccines got to skip the FDA approval process - race through some insufficient, basic trials with no long term testing and force it out the chute.

SO the reason people 'had to die' instead of being allowed to try HCQ when Covid first came out was so the Covid Industry could push EUA vaccines later. Had HCQ been in use, the vaccines would not be eligible for EUA and would have had to go through the 2 year process of standard testing for FDA.

ANother requirement for the vaccines' Emergency Use AUthorization was that it be a medical emergency (i.e. pandemic) during which it would be more humane to try the treatment (in this case vaccines) then let large numbers of people die. Well, withholding all treatment until ventilators were needed, and then using respiratory therapy at levels too aggressive for Covid infected tissue, resulted in large numbers of needless deaths which allowed EUA vaccines to rush to market. Forcing sick Covid patients into nursing homes while denying access to effective medications also helped create the deaths required for 'emergency' use of the vaccines.

The Bossche interview contains the same content less specialized doctors and researchers have been sharing but which are being purged from the media everywhere it emerges, and then derided as conspiracy theory etc. It's sad.

Just let us have HCQ, Ivermectin. Just let doctors do what they normally do instead of firing them for speaking, leveraging pharmacies to stop them from writing prescriptions for FDA approved medications in use for 60 years.

Stop dangerous vaccine experiments being performed on the public while lying and claiming they are 'FDA approved'. When Fauci was asked if they were FDA approved he said, "Yes" and then skillfully introduced EUA as if it were the same thing when he obviously knows it is not.

As long as HCQ and Ivermectin and others are banned from use - the Covid vaccine will role on under it's EUA falsely claiming no other medications or treatments exist.

His concerns are predicated upon the vaccines not preventing transmission, but all the early/current studies are now showing that they do prevent transmission in 80-95% range.

PS: mRNA vaccines are not gene therapy and do not change or effect your DNA. Big scientific gaffes like that lose credibility instantly.

~~~~~~~~~~

No, his concerns are more complex.

Vaccine companies and Fauci started pushing their products by stating they do not stop transmission or infection therefore we must continue to wear masks and social distance. As people held off getting the vaccine, the lies grew to say that SOME people may experience reduced transmission.
Well reduction in transmission was happening before the vaccines kicked off. Testing is down, the tests are being altered (they were always cycling too high at 40 cycles are more and now are being lowered). So the vaccine industry is....lying again.

As to your instant loss of credibility re mRNA, please read and learn and stop childing others for knowing more than you do.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.