Well I already posted one of the evidences against one of the big proofs earlier on the thread, showing the original ABC news photo that was manipulated by Q to pretend that he had access to Air Force One.
Mostly people were just debunking them as they appeared, so they are probably scattered on a bunch of old threads. I’ll have to look around and see if anyone compiled a good website for them.
You’re lying by asserting facts not demonstrated.
You have not proven that Q’s photograph was a photoshop of the other photo.
You keep assuming the thing you’re trying to prove.
And changing the subject to the emotional state of your disputants is not logically valid, nor compelling.
You must first show that someone is wrong, before it becomes meaningful to discuss why they are wrong.
For example, a photo of known provenance, proven to have been taken of that same spot on Air Force One, between 2015 and Q’s photo, which differs significantly from both the above photos, would establish more credibility to your claim; unless (as was discussed on the boards, long before this thread) those in a position, set the decor under President Trump to resemble earlier decor, to send a message to the Obama crowd, or yank their chain.
Or open up the Q photo in GIMP or somesuch and show the layers and artifacts from photo manipulation, as was done to the erstwhile O’Muslim birth certificate.
I have discovered the lie in this statement.
"...that was manipulated by Q...".
You just made that part up and threw it in there, thinking nobody would notice.
Lucky I'm here to bust you, Booger. Otherwise, people might think you know what you're talking about.
