I have discovered the lie in this statement.
"...that was manipulated by Q...".
You just made that part up and threw it in there, thinking nobody would notice.
Lucky I'm here to bust you, Booger. Otherwise, people might think you know what you're talking about.

“You just made that part up”
No, it’s called a conclusion, see if you have this fact:
“Q posted a photo from AF1”
and this fact:
“Q’s photo is a manipulated version of the ABC News photo”
then the obvious conclusion is:
“Q manipulated the ABC News photo”
I suppose someone else could have manipulated the photo for Q if he is too incompetent to use photoshop, but I thought I would give Q the benefit of the doubt on that one.