You’re lying by asserting facts not demonstrated.
You have not proven that Q’s photograph was a photoshop of the other photo.
You keep assuming the thing you’re trying to prove.
And changing the subject to the emotional state of your disputants is not logically valid, nor compelling.
You must first show that someone is wrong, before it becomes meaningful to discuss why they are wrong.
For example, a photo of known provenance, proven to have been taken of that same spot on Air Force One, between 2015 and Q’s photo, which differs significantly from both the above photos, would establish more credibility to your claim; unless (as was discussed on the boards, long before this thread) those in a position, set the decor under President Trump to resemble earlier decor, to send a message to the Obama crowd, or yank their chain.
Or open up the Q photo in GIMP or somesuch and show the layers and artifacts from photo manipulation, as was done to the erstwhile O’Muslim birth certificate.
“You have not proven that Q’s photograph was a photoshop of the other photo.”
No, because anyone can look at the two photos, see all the details in the photos are exactly the same except for the photo being flipped and distorted, reflected off an iPhone, and come to the correct conclusion for themselves. It’s not something I feel like investing a lot of effort in “proving”, since it is obvious to any fair minded and rational person, and those to whom it’s not obvious aren’t going to change their mind no matter what I say.