“You have not proven that Q’s photograph was a photoshop of the other photo.”
No, because anyone can look at the two photos, see all the details in the photos are exactly the same except for the photo being flipped and distorted, reflected off an iPhone, and come to the correct conclusion for themselves. It’s not something I feel like investing a lot of effort in “proving”, since it is obvious to any fair minded and rational person, and those to whom it’s not obvious aren’t going to change their mind no matter what I say.
ROFL!! All of a sudden, after Bagster shoves some facts up your ass, you add the ‘reflected off an i-phone’ as though you’d included it all along.
Turkey.