Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q unmasked? Right-wing conspiracy group QAnon's mysterious leader Q is named as Ron Watkins, the son of 8Chan owner, in new docu-series
Daily Mail ^ | 03 15 2021 | Jennifer Smith

Posted on 03/16/2021 11:38:22 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

Q: Into The Storm is airing on HBO Max on March 21

It names Ronald Watkins, the son of 8Chan owner Jim Watkins, as Q

The filmmakers say they spent three years studying the right-wing conspiracy theory

Ron is the administrator of 8Chan, now known as 8Kun, where QAnon erupted

The founder of 8Chan - Frederick Brennan - has previously named Ron or his father as Q

They are the only two who have verified Q's posts on 8Chan

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: 8chan; believeanythingcrowd; bidenlovershateq; bidenlovesq; bidenskeywordtrolls; brennan; coocoo; deadenders; easilyfooled; facebook; fredbrennan; frederickbrennan; hailexaltedone; instagram; jackdorsey; jimwatkins; lol; q; qanon; qooks; qtards; quackery; quisp; qult; rinotrolls; ronaldwatkins; ronwatkins; shortbuslikesq; trustwatkins; twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-172 next last
To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
It's his father, Jim Watkins, who also posted as Q....name calling just makes you look more deranged.

Another lie, on a thread full of lies.

Is calling somebody who lies, a 'liar' really name calling?


61 posted on 03/16/2021 2:19:38 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bagster

“Lying is not attractive”

Explains why so many people seem to find you repulsive.


62 posted on 03/16/2021 2:20:46 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Delta 21

LOL


63 posted on 03/16/2021 2:21:52 PM PDT by Chode (Ashli Babbitt - #SayHerNAME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1; bagster

He’s super-triggered right now, but this is just his standard operating procedure anytime someone on FR starts posting some of the mountains of damning evidence against this junk that he staked his whole reputation on. It’s an exercise in futility, but I guess he’s just too proud to quit now.


64 posted on 03/16/2021 2:22:40 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: enumerated

“Very few conservatives fell for the Q nonsense”

Yes, very few, but the few that did make a lot of noise.


65 posted on 03/16/2021 2:23:12 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
Which means, I'm still correct: the son of a man is not the same as the man himself.

And I wasn't taken in, either; nor am I embarrassed. Nor, yet again, deranged. Typical troll BS trying to bluster with junior-high level insults. Go befriend yourself in a close and intimate fashion.

66 posted on 03/16/2021 2:24:50 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: enumerated
Very few conservatives fell for the Q nonsense - far, far fewer than they would have us believe.

You may be onto something. Q spoke to patriots, not so-called 'conservatives'. Which is why so many in their millions woke up, crossed over, and voted for Trump.

Conservatives like Mitt Romney, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, the Lincoln Foundation, and many FR shleps chose to remain in their ivory towers and disregard Trump and Q. To America's eternal shame.

Now look at you 'conservatives' dancing on Trump's grave.

Or so you think.


67 posted on 03/16/2021 2:25:17 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

You said that Q’s photo was necessarily photoshopped from the Time magazine spread.

Two independent photos of the same thing, are often (by definition) going to look similar, even without photoshop; the resemblance is not enough to support, let alone prove, your assertion.


68 posted on 03/16/2021 2:26:16 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: csvset
Well Q is real.

Attaboy, csvset.

Who said you were an idiot?


69 posted on 03/16/2021 2:27:20 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

They’re not photos of the same thing, the one is a manipulated version of the other photo. The furniture, items on the table, the jacket on the chair, the placement of every individual blind, and the lighting are all exactly the same. To assert that those could all be the same in two photos taken years apart, under different presidential administrations, is completely implausible.


70 posted on 03/16/2021 2:35:12 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: bagster

” and many FR shleps”

So, every FReeper who didn’t fall for your Q fantasy is a “schlep”, is that correct?

Just want to get you on record.


71 posted on 03/16/2021 2:36:29 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
I obviously know more about Q than you...

...instead of just assuming that you know everything there is to know on this topic of which you were actually a latecomer.

I obviously know more about Q than you, since you still haven’t figured out that Q is a fraud.

The fact that you think Q is a fraud is prima facie proof you know nothing of Q.

This case is closed.

Bailiff, remove the witness.


72 posted on 03/16/2021 2:37:34 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Fungi

Wasn’t QAnon revered here on FR by many?


73 posted on 03/16/2021 2:38:06 PM PDT by TiGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bagster

Hey, you know what Bagster? A couple of years ago I made a prediction. I predicted that when Trump left office, and all of the mass arrests and military tribunals Q was predicting failed to materialize, there would still be a core of diehard Q believers who would still refuse to admit that Q was a fraud, despite the fact that it would be obvious to everyone else at that point.

And here you are, a diehard Q believer refusing to admit what everyone else realizes by now. You know what that means? I have successfully predicted the future.

Which means my track record for successfully predicting the future is now better than your boy Q’s track record.


74 posted on 03/16/2021 2:41:29 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
So, every FReeper who didn’t fall for your Q fantasy is a “schlep”, is that correct?

Absolutely.

Amongst other things.

And let's get you on record. Everybody that did is a gullible Qtard, conspiracy theory whacko. Do I got that right?


75 posted on 03/16/2021 2:41:50 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: bagster

“Everybody that did is a gullible Qtard, conspiracy theory whacko. Do I got that right?”

No, I wouldn’t say that about everyone who believed in Q at any point. Many of them were simply misinformed, or manipulated by unscrupulous people, and many of them saw the error of their ways pretty quickly and disassociated themselves from the nonsense.

The diehards that still push this junk now even after it is patently obviously that it was bull manure, those I would say are definitely either deluded or mentally not all there.


76 posted on 03/16/2021 2:46:06 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

You’re just doubling down on the lie.

Circular reasoning, see also, reasoning, circular.


77 posted on 03/16/2021 2:54:08 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: TiGuy22

Too many...I was not one of them...


78 posted on 03/16/2021 2:57:40 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

“You’re just doubling down on the lie.”

No, it’s truth. I’m doubling down on truth. Just saying something is a “lie” because you don’t like it, does not magically make it a lie.


79 posted on 03/16/2021 2:58:55 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
#FakeNews.
80 posted on 03/16/2021 2:59:29 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson