Posted on 02/23/2021 7:20:09 AM PST by MtnClimber
How do these leftist elitists explain that it is not the right, but the left that has exterminated their own citizens by the millions in the last century. Estimates I have seen put the death toll at between 100 and 260 million people exterminated by communist governments. To these elitists Brexit or supporting Trump are extremist, violent and dangerous. Supporting communism is enlightened and good.
>>The study also maps the psychological signatures that underpin fierce political conservatism, as well as “dogmatism”: people who have a fixed worldview and are resistant to evidence.
>>Psychologists found that conservatism is linked to cognitive “caution”: slow-and-accurate unconscious decision-making, compared to the fast-and-imprecise “perceptual strategies” found in more liberal minds.
Much much more evidence and case history for studying dogmatic militant Communists who are always spouting off about “The Struggle”.
Allow me to translate:
Stupid and impulsive people become right-wingers.
(Poor memories, and “slow-to-process.”)
There.
Maybe they could conduct and publish a study?
Labeling anyone that disagrees with you “an extremist” is definitely a sign of emotional and mental stability (extreme sarcasm)
Soviet psychiatry.
Exactly right. Eugenics right around the corner.
Phrenology lives, baby!
Looks like they are getting ready to red flag a whole bunch of people, using “science”, of course.
That was my thought too.
Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those who pretend the Right embraces violence when there's little evidence but ignore Leftists who do embrace violence?
Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those who falsify evidence that others are resistant to?
Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those call who call the impulsive, reactionary, immature, illogical, and defective decision-making in liberal minds "fast-and-imprecise"?
Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those who hide the truth that such "fast and imprecise" decision-making is found in prey animals, human children, and drug users?
Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those say the signature for extremism across the board is a blend of conservative and dogmatic psychologies while ignoring the truth that extremism is caused by the direct opposites of conservative who have no dogma since it shifts to their whims?
Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those who publish studies that intentionally mis-identify conservatives as extremists in order to avoid identifying those on the Left who actually are radicalized? (Forget vulnerable to being radicalized.)
Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those who lie, propagandize, and gaslight others in an attempt to provide false explanations of the world?
Exactly right. Eugenics right around the corner.No doubt discreetly called something else and therefore "proven" not at all like the Nazis (or the first wave of American proponents).
The left want to call you an extremist, even though your values have been around for centuries. It is projection (an unconscious urge) or derogatory name calling (a conscious urge).
When the lunatics start calling regular people lunatics then you know things are up in the air. When sex changing babies, pedophilia, biological men in women sports, lack of free speech, etc. become the regular norms then society has changed from what it was for hundreds of years. The people who advocate these changes are the extremists. However, when these changes take effect the normal values are then labeled extreme by these people. Things are flipped 180 degrees.
This took a psychologist?
If I want to see an extremist mind, I just go to any of the social apps, listen to the lowest intellects in universities (studies, arts, etc) or listen to any Dimbulbcrat. They all converge to the lowest IQ extant, that of
Easy peasy.
I think they are mapping their own projection.
So...they don't weigh facts, jump to conclusions, and get things wrong. Like the author himself.
Indeed wonder if anyone recorded any of their 1960’s world wide radio broadcasts.
It wouldn’t do the author any good to read this article. He’d never understand it.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3920426/posts
Psychologists are the architects of the psyops campaigns against western civilization. They are criminal frauds. They invent BS like this article at the behest of their employers. Psychologists are charlatans and each one knows full well that he/she is a fraud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.