Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those who pretend the Right embraces violence when there's little evidence but ignore Leftists who do embrace violence?
Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those who falsify evidence that others are resistant to?
Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those call who call the impulsive, reactionary, immature, illogical, and defective decision-making in liberal minds "fast-and-imprecise"?
Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those who hide the truth that such "fast and imprecise" decision-making is found in prey animals, human children, and drug users?
Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those say the signature for extremism across the board is a blend of conservative and dogmatic psychologies while ignoring the truth that extremism is caused by the direct opposites of conservative who have no dogma since it shifts to their whims?
Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those who publish studies that intentionally mis-identify conservatives as extremists in order to avoid identifying those on the Left who actually are radicalized? (Forget vulnerable to being radicalized.)
Have these researchers mapped an underlying "psychological signature" for those who lie, propagandize, and gaslight others in an attempt to provide false explanations of the world?
I think they are mapping their own projection.