Well at least we now know their methods having shown their hand. (If true)
An Article V Convention should only happen if Conservatives can control it.
Bad, awful idea.
It would be chaos and upheaval; if you think that the United States is divided now...think again.
Fake News. Read up on Convention of States. The John Birchers on FR have been spouting garbage for years about it— since Levin wrote the definitive book on it.
Just say NO to a ‘cos’.
Mark Levin has been promoting Convention of States for years now. Check out what he has said about this. He’s the smart one in the room here.
I am amazed by the number of people who think such a convention
could be controlled by Conservatives on Constitutional grounds.
We just had an attempt to impeach a private citizen by the Senate
of the United States. The Chief Justice did not preside over the
trial.
Now we think we can control a Constitutional Convention?
Wow folks, you’re treading in uncharted territory.
As for Soros rewriting our Constitution, well is there much
of anything more absurd?
A convention would look like what congress looks like now: completely dysfunctional. Normal states peeling off to form their own union would be the best solution and even that would be fraught with risk.
Setting aside the possibility of President Klain larping Lincoln, it would still be a rough start since the remaining USSA would go out of their way to make the divorce as painful as possible.
Unpleasant article on the Article V topic.
Wow. That’s probably the most disingenuous headline I’ve seen so far this year. It says a Convention *would* let George Soros rewrite the Constitution. But then the excerpt changes that “would” to a “could”.
Well, yeah. A Convention could let Soros or AOC or David Letterman rewrite the Constitution. Anything is possible with a “could”.
Anyhow, I’m in favor of a Convention of States. The article is correct in that a Convention is risky. But the Republic is slipping away before our very eyes. At least we should try to fix things before it’s too late.
First one to mention George Soros as a working partner loses.
Where do they find these people?
Did no one else answer the Ad for
Parler CEO?
Dan Bongino may want to think about selling most or all of his stake in this company and just walking away from it.
I could be mistaken, but in a Constitutional Convention, any or all of the current Constitution could be repealed or modified, but whatever the modification might be, the states would then have to ratify the changes as if they were a series of Constitutional Amendments.......
For example of the 2nd Amendment were repealed, it would not take effect unless the states approved...
Parler seems rotten to the core. I hope Dan Bongino can get his investment back.
“Not sure I like this.”
————————————
Not sure I believe this.
In fact I’m pretty sure I don’t believe this.
Very misleading headline. There are many people I respect that support the Convention of States and in theory it could be great, but has the potential to be a disaster. I don’t know enough to make a firm decision and want a lot more understanding. However, no one that supports the CofS would ever want input from George Soros.
I don’t like this and I don’t like Parler, I don’t care who says it’s great.
article title pure hyperbole, fear-mongering clickbait. Yes, Soros-infected groups would try to influence a COS, as would many others, at least some of which would be along the Libertarian/Conservative lines. This is not the same as wanting Soros to “rewrite the Constitituion.” Jeez Louise.
For the record I am against a COS.
Now that DNC and Soros have discovered how to win elections at will with a giant xerox machine, a COS may be the only way to turn this around. The second is for governors to start to refuse orders from DC.
Something has to turn this around, and it isn’t going to be GOP in 2022. They were complicit in bringing Trump down. And they have no plan to fix the election fraud, or even admit that it happened.