Posted on 02/16/2021 4:32:22 AM PST by Mr170IQ
The speech I think Trump could have given, 2 days after the election.
On election night, the vote counting was stopped in several battleground states, the poll watchers were sent home, and then was secretly resumed to replace tens of thousands of valid ballots with fraudulent ballots for Joe Biden. Hundreds of low-paid workers were brought in in the middle of the night to perform the tasks required for this fraud. I am speaking now to those people who were hired to perform these illegal actions, and offering them a once-in-a-lifetime chance to come clean and redeem their honor.
For the first three people to come forward from each battleground state with verifiable confessions and evidence of their election fraud activities, I am offering a reward of six million dollars each, along with a presidential pardon and relocation in the witness protection program if desired.
The next seven people to come forward from each battleground state with verifiable confessions and evidence of their election fraud activities, I am offering a reward of five hundred thousand dollars each and a presidential pardon and relocation in the witness protection program if desired.
The next twenty people to come forward from each battleground state with verifiable confessions and evidence of their election fraud activities, I am offering a reward of one hundred thousand dollars each and a presidential pardon.
The next fifty people to come forward from each battleground state with verifiable confessions and evidence of their election fraud activities, I am offering a presidential pardon.
Other people involved in this fraud will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Time to decide where you want to spend the next few years, living it up or sitting behind bars.
...
Your move, Soros.
At least it would have been fun watching the liberal heads explode.
LOL, I like the way you think.
However...money does talk.
That said, there were PLENTY of people who came forward with evidence that should have been looked at, and hundreds of affidavits with legal weight were compiled, but few (if even any) were looked at or followed up on.
They were all in on the steal.
Offering bribe money is never a good idea
All he had to say is “ eat it Nanzi!”
> Offering bribe money is never a good idea
Normally I would agree with you. But this falls into the category of ‘offering a reward for information leading to a conviction’ , which is considered ethical. I find it hard to imagine that it would not have been worth it if it had succeeded.
At the time, it seemed there was a fairly good chance that fighting the fraud through the courts and/or the state legislatures could succeed.
Looking back, I see I was very naïve.
I like it with one adjustment. Make the reward money based on evidence provided $1000 per fraudulent vote.
Read later.
This is a classic psychological maneuver known as the “Prisoner’s Dilemma” , where waiting to confess allows your co-conspirators to screw you over.
The dozens of low-paid inner city lowlifes that they hired for the grunt work on this fraud would be crawling all over each other to confess first.
Another trick he could have done would have been getting FISA warrants for wiretaps on leading democrat leaders and fixers prior to making this speech.
He could have leaked that he was going to concede, and the MSM networks would have gleefully carried his speech live.
Then after he surprises them with the real speech, he has a small group of loyal NSA guys capture the incriminating phone calls between the members of the conspiracy.
Then he could have posted the recordings to Rumble. Ha ha!
He would have had to make extra, extra sure that the FISA warrants were not leaked to the dems, though.
Sorry but the time for that threat was after the 2016 election and the 2018 election when Trump was claiming vote fraud. And the chance to turn that threat into action is long since past. Trump could have made vote fraud prosecutions a priority for his Justice Department. He didn't, and he paid the price.
> Other people involved in this fraud will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
This line was not really intended to be true.
It was just meant as a little push, to help convince the lower level participants in the fraud to try to confess early and get rich rather than risk jail. The higher-level leaders would expect that their connections would protect them anyway.
Note, this is not a cheap plan.
$23.5 million per state for four states = $94 million
Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin
But he could do a fundraiser from the Trump voters. $2 each from 63% of them would have been enough.
RICO would have done the trick, but that would have required Barr to be something other than a POS.
“Note, this is not a cheap plan. $23.5 million per state for four states = $94 million
Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin”
Trump raised over $270M with his stop the steal campaign after the election.
Reward money.
That’s not what a DA or AG would call it
Yeah, the left would just say he was trying to bribe people to perjure themselves.
So, any reward offered is illegal?
Nope.
Rewards offered are normal.
Given today’s political criminal justice run by dems, I expect ANY testimony to be prosecuted because, well, it made clear the criminality of the rat party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.