> Offering bribe money is never a good idea
Normally I would agree with you. But this falls into the category of ‘offering a reward for information leading to a conviction’ , which is considered ethical. I find it hard to imagine that it would not have been worth it if it had succeeded.
At the time, it seemed there was a fairly good chance that fighting the fraud through the courts and/or the state legislatures could succeed.
Looking back, I see I was very naïve.
I like it with one adjustment. Make the reward money based on evidence provided $1000 per fraudulent vote.
This is a classic psychological maneuver known as the “Prisoner’s Dilemma” , where waiting to confess allows your co-conspirators to screw you over.
The dozens of low-paid inner city lowlifes that they hired for the grunt work on this fraud would be crawling all over each other to confess first.
Note, this is not a cheap plan.
$23.5 million per state for four states = $94 million
Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin
But he could do a fundraiser from the Trump voters. $2 each from 63% of them would have been enough.