Posted on 02/09/2021 5:50:10 AM PST by Homer_J_Simpson
OUR WASHINGTON DISPATCHES.
WASHINGTON, Friday, Feb. 8.
The wires were all down last night, except one occupied in transmitting Congressional proceedings, so that it was impossible to get any news over by telegraph. Fortunately there was nothing of much importance to transmit.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PEACE CONVENTION.
The Peace Convention yesterday did scarcely anything beyond meeting and adjourning to give the State delegations and sections time to caucus. Opinions are divided as to what will be the result of their deliberations. Some of the New-Jersey delegates express decided hope of some satisfactory arrangement being agreed upon. The more general outside impression is that the discussions in Convention will be prolonged for a week or ten days, resulting in a better understanding between different sections, the renewal of confidence on the part of each as to the views, purposes and sentiments of the other, and the adoption, at last, of some modified basis of conciliation, similar to the Adams proposition, or the one suggested by Judge KELLOGG, of Illinois. It is not supposed that any unanimous agreement can be arrived at, but that a majority of moderate men will recommend a settlement of the question in terms which will be equally protested against by the extreme men of both North and South.
The Peace Convention has gone so far as to require the Commissioners not to express any opinion to outsiders as to the probabilities of agreement or disagreement. The New-York delegation, under instructions, moved for open sessions to-day, but failed to carry their motion. The report in a cotemporary of the debate on the resolution to appoint a Committee report a plan of settlement, is pronounced by the Commissioners a pure fabrication, and where read and believed is calculated to place the parties named in a false position.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
First session: November 21, 2015. Last date to add: Sometime in the future.
Reading: Self-assigned. Recommendations made and welcomed.
Posting history, in reverse order
https://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:homerjsimpson/index?tab=articles
To add this class to or drop it from your schedule notify Admissions and Records (Attn: Homer_J_Simpson) by reply or freepmail.
Link to previous New York Times thread
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3932657/posts
At least they were actually attempting unity back then...
This time the Democrat Party wants all out revenge.
Hi.
There’s a “peace party conference” going on right now in the U.S. Senate. It’s like 1861 all over again. This time methinks TX will be first to secede.
Maybe I need to relax and take a break from this class. Or drink more...
5.56mm
Yet again our editors argue the foolishness of secessionists attempting to coerce Britain & France into recognizing their Confederacy by threatening to withhold KING COTTON from them.
They argue (correctly) that rather than recognize the Confederate slave empire, Britain & France will simply look elsewhere in the world for cotton.
They also say (correctly) that since cotton is the South's only major product, without cotton the Confederacy is nothing.
Therefore, Confederates should do everything possible to avoid interruption of their cotton exports.
That would include maintaining peaceful relations with the United States.
The problem is, as Jefferson Davis will soon write to CSA Gen. Bragg, regarding Fort Sumter:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.