Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

The short interest on GME was about 140% — meaning there were more shares shorted than the number available.

Naked shorting, in other words. Illegal.


95 posted on 01/28/2021 10:23:51 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers
I may be wrong about this, but I thought I read yesterday that a "naked short" is legal as long as the buyer/speculator can take possession of the shares within a certain period of time (1-2 business days?).

At any rate, it was also explained that the short interest in GME could legitimately exceed 100% if there were large numbers of shares changing hands at multiple times during the course of a trading day -- i.e., Short Seller A borrows 100 shares from Short Seller B, then immediately lends the same 100 shares to Short Seller C, etc.

I may be totally wrong about this, but this is what I understand from reading up on this story yesterday here on FR and in other places.

134 posted on 01/28/2021 11:13:11 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson