Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers
I may be wrong about this, but I thought I read yesterday that a "naked short" is legal as long as the buyer/speculator can take possession of the shares within a certain period of time (1-2 business days?).

At any rate, it was also explained that the short interest in GME could legitimately exceed 100% if there were large numbers of shares changing hands at multiple times during the course of a trading day -- i.e., Short Seller A borrows 100 shares from Short Seller B, then immediately lends the same 100 shares to Short Seller C, etc.

I may be totally wrong about this, but this is what I understand from reading up on this story yesterday here on FR and in other places.

134 posted on 01/28/2021 11:13:11 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
That sounds like what we used to call "float" in checking accounts in the olde days of snail mail.

People would overdraft their accounts, and there was an allowance of time for the check to be delivered, deposited in the recipient's bank, and then send the check back to the holder's bank to be cleared.

So, in the days of millisecond trading, there is a float period while shares are in the middle of trading?

-PJ

142 posted on 01/28/2021 11:16:44 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson