Posted on 12/27/2020 5:31:34 PM PST by SeekAndFind
The study, published in the November issue of the peer-reviewed scientific journal Nature Communications, studied 9,899,828 residents of Wuhan, screening them between May 14, 2020 and June 1, 2020. The results provided clear evidence as to the possibility of any asymptomatic transmission of the virus.
The study was compiled by 19 scientists from the Huazhong University of Science & Technology in Wuhan, and highly respected scientific institutions in the UK and Australia.
Titled Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly 10 million residents of Wuhan, China, the study thoroughly debunked the concept of asymptomatic transmission.
Out of the nearly 10 million people in the study, results revealed “300 asymptomatic cases” were found. Utilizing contact tracing, of those 300, not a single case of COVID-19 were detected in any of them.
Asymptomatic spread of COVID not a thing. https://t.co/TwF4A43JHi. Have some well considered hugs. Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China | Nature Communications https://t.co/gFgSsKxjPo
— Dr Naomi Wolf (@naomirwolf) November 22, 2020
Further examination of the study subjects revealed that “virus cultures” in the positive and re-positive asymptomatic cases were all negative, “indicating no ‘viable virus’ in positive cases detected in this study.”
The age range of those found to be asymptomatic was between 10 and 89 years of age. The asymptomatic positive rate was “lowest in children or adolescents aged 17 and below” and the highest rate was found among people older than 60.
The study also concluded with high confidence that due to a weakening of the virus itself, “newly infected persons were more likely to be asymptomatic and with a lower viral load than earlier infected cases.”
In June of 2020, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the World Health Organization’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, stated publicly that she doubted the narrative advanced by the political class on asymptomatic transmission.
Van Kerkhove explained during a press conference that, “from the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.”
In fact, Van Kerkhove couldn’t point to a single case of asymptomatic transmission, noting that numerous reports “were not finding secondary transmission onward.”
The false narrative of asymptomatic transmission has been the justification used by the political and activist classes for lockdowns enacted all across the world.
Even the US Centers for Disease Control has been politicized in its advancing of the asymptomatic transmission false narrative. They falsely advance claims that asymptomatic people “are estimated to account for more than 50 percent of transmissions.”
There is no scientific data to corroborate this position.
A growing number of social scientists have started to advance the idea that the lockdowns – most prevalent in states with Democrat and Progressive governors, and in many cases states critical to the 2020 General Election – were nefariously instituted to facilitate a manipulation of the election process.
I’m really shocked. /sarc
It’s almost like all of the experts have been lying to us. But that would be crazy talk.
Wow; the study’s authors are twenty CCP members and one guy with a German-sounding name. Brings an old saying that begins with the words “Too many cooks” to mind . . .
This is exactly why Business Lockdowns, 6 feet Social Distancing, and masks save lives. They fool the Covid symptoms into coming out in the open, rather than staying hidden in the host. Vaccines can then eradicate the symptoms. If you can’t understand this you are anti-science
Why would anyone believe anything that comes out of china.
The study notes the earlier results on asymptomatic transmission, and does NOT claim that the study contradicts those earlier results; further, it says, ”Public health measures for the prevention and control of COVID-19 epidemic, including wearing masks, keeping safe social distancing in Wuhan should be sustained.” - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
BAAAAAAAaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!
Seekandfind is a CCP member . Not being sarcastic.
Where did the “6 foot rule” come from?
Can’t possibly be scientific.
The problem with this is you have to believe the Chinese.
RE: Seekandfind is a CCP member . Not being sarcastic.
And you’re a member of the Russian Communist Party. Not being sarcastic
The 6 feet social programming is because the vaccine has a chip for 5g reception and people need to be at 6 feet away to read the right 5g person's chip.
That is completely asinine “reasoning.”
Everything you said is a lie:
1. The virus has no “intelligence” to be fooled or not.
2. Vaccines have never “eradicated” symptoms—they actually force your body to eradicate the root cause.
3. Masks and distancing DO NOTHING when people have no symptoms.
YOU ARE ANTI-SCIENCE! How do you live in this world with such idiocy in your head?
RE: The problem with this is you have to believe the Chinese.
So, the peer reviewed study is meaningless then?
THIS.
So will this ever make the news?
Well, whaddayaknow...
The only thing I want to know about China is when is my husband getting home with the Chinese food and wil it be good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.