Posted on 12/23/2020 5:59:12 AM PST by LS
There has been a lot of discussion about Pence's role in the upcoming counting of the elector slates.
In 1797 there was a single challenge from, as I recall, Georgia, whose electors had filled out the paperwork wrong. John Adams, the veep, stood to become president by not entertaining any objections. But when he came to Georgia, he sat down for a moment. Thomas Jefferson had ordered the Democratic Republicans NOT to contest, and after a moment, Adams resumed the count . . . in his favor.
A similar episode happened in 1801 with Jefferson doing the reading and an issue with (as I recall) VT. This time Jefferson did not pause, but kept on reading.
In 1960, Hawaii's electoral votes, which by popular vote should have gone to Nixon, were objected to and awarded to JFK, though they made no difference.
That's the historical precedent.
My understanding of the process is as follows:
1) The two houses meet in Joint Session Jan. 6, I think. 2) Two tellers from the Senate and two tellers from the House tally the electors SUBMITTED BY THE STATES. This would include the Biteme electors from MI, WI, AZ, NV, GA, PA. Those tellers had their lists---which must all agree---to the Vice President who presides over the Senate---to read.
Pence then says, "The state of Alabama gives its x electors to . . .; the state of Alaska gives its x electors to . . ."
3) At any point an objection may be raised to any slate. This must include one senator and one congressman.
4) If say Brooks and Hawley object, Pence would say, "An objection has been raised to the slate from Arizona. The chambers will now retire to discuss the objections."
HE DOES NOT HIMSELF ACCEPT OR REJECT ANYTHING. He merely presides.
5) Presumably, at this point, the Senate walks to the senate chambers (realize, this is a kind of pain in the ass. Now imagine it being done six times). The House of course will accept ALL Biteme slates. For any challenge to be accepted BOTH houses must agree. If they do not, "tie goes to the runner" in this case the slates submitted by the states. Unless both houses agree, not one single Trump slate would be accepted.
6) But even then, how many of you really think that a Trump challenge slate in the Senate would carry? At best we start out with 50 votes, but no Pence to break the tie in this particular case. Tie goes to the runner. So you need 51 of the 53. Minion, Sasshole, MurCowSki, Collins, and probably Grahamnesty would never vote for the Trump slate. My guess is in fact you'd be lucky to get 20 votes for the challenge slate.
But it doesn't matter because tie goes to the runner, the official slate sent by the states.
7) So they meet again in Joint Session after discussions and even if the Senate has voted for the Trump slate, Pence announces AZ's electoral votes go to Biteme.
Note again, Pence has no role of power whatsoever except to as a parliamentarian to accept the objection of a senator/congressman.
Hope this clears up some of the muck.
Under the Constitution, there exists no mechanism to resolve a dispute in which the two houses of Congress cannot agree upon a certified set of electors, and there is no Constitutional role for the courts, including the Supreme Court.
There is a controlling federal law. When the two houses fail to agree, "the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by the executive of the State, under the seal thereof, shall be counted."
https://law.justia.com/codes/us/2018/title-3/chapter-1/sec-15/
3 U.S.C. § 15§15. Counting electoral votes in Congress
Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors. The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of 1 o'clock in the afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer. Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and two on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the letter A; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes as they shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes having been ascertained and counted according to the rules in this subchapter provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected President and Vice President of the United States, and, together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Journals of the two Houses. Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any. Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. When all objections so made to any vote or paper from a State shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections to the House of Representatives for its decision; and no electoral vote or votes from any State which shall have been regularly given by electors whose appointment has been lawfully certified to according to section 6 of this title from which but one return has been received shall be rejected, but the two Houses concurrently may reject the vote or votes when they agree that such vote or votes have not been so regularly given by electors whose appointment has been so certified. If more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State shall have been received by the President of the Senate, those votes, and those only, shall be counted which shall have been regularly given by the electors who are shown by the determination mentioned in section 5 of this title to have been appointed, if the determination in said section provided for shall have been made, or by such successors or substitutes, in case of a vacancy in the board of electors so ascertained, as have been appointed to fill such vacancy in the mode provided by the laws of the State; but in case there shall arise the question which of two or more of such State authorities determining what electors have been appointed, as mentioned in section 5 of this title, is the lawful tribunal of such State, the votes regularly given of those electors, and those only, of such State shall be counted whose title as electors the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide is supported by the decision of such State so authorized by its law; and in such case of more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State, if there shall have been no such determination of the question in the State aforesaid, then those votes, and those only, shall be counted which the two Houses shall concurrently decide were cast by lawful electors appointed in accordance with the laws of the State, unless the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide such votes not to be the lawful votes of the legally appointed electors of such State. But if the two Houses shall disagree in respect of the counting of such votes, then, and in that case, the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by the executive of the State, under the seal thereof, shall be counted. When the two Houses have voted, they shall immediately again meet, and the presiding officer shall then announce the decision of the questions submitted. No votes or papers from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to the votes or papers from any State shall have been finally disposed of.
I think your summation is accurate and correct.
The only problem with this scenario is only the courts could declare that the votes were fraudelent or invalid. No court has done so. Pence cannot just declare the votes fraudelent on his own.
This is where the courts come into play. They need to get a judge to rule the state election UNLAWFUL, and the GA Governor must recuse himself for being instrumental in the selection and implementation of the machines and malware used to commit election fraud.
LS, you clearly assured us of a safe & fair election on election day. You were totally wrong. Your credibility is now on par with Baghdad Bob. How in the world could you say such thing like this election will be safe and fair? Have you been in coma for 4 years and not watched Mueller, and Pelosi’s attempt to remove Trump by impeachment under false pretentions of Russia collusion? Have you forgotten the spying on Trump surrogates during campaign?
IDK what constitutional procedures will take place on January 6th, 2021. But I can say for sure, you are no Nostradamus.
Courts have no role in the US Constitution on events of January 6th. It is entirely up to the people closest to voter’s desires which is state legislatures. Framers purposely and effectively excluded the judiciary for events on January 6th.
Can you show me where in US Constitution it says the presiding officer on January 6th has no power to decide which slate of electors is valid?
And I can say, Trump won.
Do you agree?
If not, then there was no fraud.
If the were fraud, I was right.
And you’re no Stephen Hawking.
I reviewed Hawaii’s electoral votes in 1960 after this.
In that case, there were THREE “certified” sets of electors, one from the Gov made before the recount showed Nixon won (for Nixon), one from the GOP electors based on that; and one from the JFK electors based on the official recount.
So there was a certification difference in the official slates that were submitted.
Nixon, as veep, merely accepted the latest official certification. He did not rule on the legitimacy of either electoral slate.
Fifty. I don't think Purdue or Loeffler will be there because the results of the runoff won't be certified in time. so only 98 will vote.
BTW, though, just a thought on the House “vote by delegation” clause:
Which only kicks in if no candidate has over 269 votes. Not going to happen.
they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, ... and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;--The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;
The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.
The actual legislation as to the process, for reference sake
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/15#
Pence can break the tie on the contested elector slates.
At best you start out with three.
Sorry, I am in error
Trump will make a path. This will not stand. Merry Christmas and prayers up.
Except they have done no such thing.
When no Electors are appointed from a State (say, Pennsylvania), then the number appointed is 515, not 535, and the number to win falls from 270 to 258.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.