Posted on 12/15/2020 11:39:23 AM PST by ransomnote
Dang... I go off to watch a replay of Kayleigh spankin MSM and I still miss it.
ThanQ for the clean slate. If the last thread hadn’t degraded so early, we wouldn’t have needed this thread yet.
Was I complicit? yep, especially being like a couple days behind.
Next time my complicity will be current.
hey...Let’s Finish This !
:: A new tred? ::
Yep.
Muh “Chucks” were gettin raggedy-assed.
5 points for whomever gets the reference.
How many fraudulent ballots can a 20 mule team pull asked no one?
73,200 lbs worth. At one ounce, times 16 ounces (= one pound) times 73,200 pounds... the answer is 1,171,200 ballots.
The rear wheels of these massive wagons measured seven feet high and were made of one-inch-thick iron. The wagon beds, constructed of solid oak measured 16 feet long, were 6 feet deep, and weighed 7,800 pounds when empty. The first wagon was called the “trailer,” the second was the “tender,”, and the water tank wagon brought up the rear. These water tanks carried some 1,200 gallons of water to supply the mules and men while in route. Water supplies were refilled at springs along the way, as it was not possible to carry enough water for the entire trip. All total, with the mules, the caravan stretched over 180 feet and when loaded with ore, the total weight was 73,200 pounds. A loaded team traveled an average of only 17 miles a day.
Thanks. Never really understood the Q threads...too much like reading Nostrodamus. Then I saw that Q had mentioned the name Richard Donoghue a year ago. Made me go, “Hmm.”
Current straggler in Festival...
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3914915/posts?page=2783#2783
pic.twitter.com/7GcJUFZ6fW— Dan Scavino🇺🇸🦅 (@DanScavino) December 15, 2020
"Someone is moving to point -->"
Acting AG Rosen...?
Not really Q related, but if anyone is interested, there is a video from a couple days ago where election attorney Robert Barnes discusses the whole “standing” issue from the Texas case. The video is kind of long (about 2 hours total), but they get into the discussion about standing starting around 30 minutes or so.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5IPEvYchMo
In Robert Barnes’ view, “standing” is a made up legal doctrine invented by the courts so that they can use it as a procedural way to not hear cases that they don’t want to hear. It does not exist in the Constitution, and it didn’t exist until the 1920s. Courts also use ripeness, mootness, laches, and other made up procedural doctrines to avoid taking cases that they don’t want.
I knew it, jump through festival to get here.
Big jump.
Went bungee jumping once, the cord broke, haven’t bounced back yet.
Thank you RNote, we are very fortunate to have you.
Merry Christmas.
Here. Thanks for the new thread
McCuckold and the GOP right now.
IN!
Thanks, ransomnote, for the effort you put in to keep this Q thread going. I’m glad you finally took my advice and let the numbers of posts go higher, so you don’t have to work harder just when things get interesting. Oh, and in at my age or thereabouts!
In and in early!
In before a hunnert
Hi 👋🏻 Mom!
Hush. Ignorance is bliss - clearly.
Lovely knight image. Tagging along.
It’s dense that’s for sure. I was lucky enough to have caught the early posts. Only missed the very beginning by less than a week. The info is astonishing. You won’t look at politics the same ever again. I can’t stay away from it. Read the resources that ransomnote starts the threads with.
Good advice.
Children should be seen, not heard.
Now, you two go along and play beyond the trees.
The grown-ups are talking.
Shoo!
In!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.