Posted on 12/15/2020 10:14:58 AM PST by RideForever
Help Wanted.
I contacted my Congress Rep to raise interest in objecting to the Harris electors now 'certified' for Washington State. Now that we are in Art. II, or 'political' phase of the Presidential election, the Natural Born Citizen ('NBC') qualification found in the US Constitution may be addressed.
Sen. Harris' parents were here on visas issued for their passports from India and Jamaica. Both countries practice birthright by bloodline, in contradiction to US policy. Clearly they were subject to the foreign jurisdictions which issued their passports. Her father became a naturalized US citizen after she was born, and he states that his daughter is not a US NBC.
Now we have a small window to file objections as voters to record an objection with the Electoral College by way of a court case, according to WA election law.
Wow. I found a case filed in CA a week ago asking for the same thing.
She certainly is a natural born citizen. She was born in Oakland CA.
You obviously haven't seen all my posts.
"In fact, you seem to be factless in all your posts."
You really haven't seen all my posts. But even the ones you have are not factless. You just disagree with them.
"Perhaps you should read more and post less. Start with Minor v. Happersett (SCOTUS)."
Been there, done that. It doesn't say what birthers want it to say.
Incorrect. That statute wasn't defining "natural born citizen". It specifically covered children who were born outside the country. It didn't mention children born inside. It was a statute passed to govern the citizenship of people born overseas.
... of parents SUBJECT TO A FOREIGN JURISDICTION. You usually lie by leaving this qualifying phrase out of your statements. It is called a lie of omission.
EXCUSE ME:
YOU are wrong.
Harris is a NATIVE BORN citizen...SAME as an ANCHOR BABY.
She is NOT a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN...
She is NOT eligible to be President or to hold any position that can succeed President.
The 14th Amendment is not a statute. People born in the US are not citizens by "statute naturalization". They are natural born citizens.
YOU ARE 100000% correct...
That is what I was taught in grade and high school. Obama arrives on the scene, and suddenly the meaning changes.
READ the Constitution
Article II
Section 1
Clause 5
BOTH parents MUST be USA citizens at the time child is born for child to be NATURAL BORN.
Kamala’s parents didn’t get their citizenship until 5-6 years later.
Harris —at best—Native Born AKA Anchor Baby
SERIOUSLY-—Please go reqad Article II
Section 1
Clause 5 of the US Constitution.
YOU ARE WRONG...
And YES, I am using caps on purpose.
I have tried to get people to understand this for years-—when Obama sneaked aboard.
There is Natural Born
There is Native Born
There are Anchor Babies.
NOT ALL THE SAME
Think of it this way:
IF you own 2 dogs that are registered AKC, their offspring can be registered AKC.
IF one is not registered-—or if both are not registered...
You only have mutts.
Kamala is a MUTT
That's wrong. There is no requirement anywhere in US law that one's parents be citizens in order to be a natural born citizen. None. That's a made up birther notion.
"That is what I was taught in grade and high school. Obama arrives on the scene, and suddenly the meaning changes."
Not true either. The birther version was not being taught in schools, let alone the fact that grade school and high school are not law school. And nothing changed with Obama except that a bunch of birthers started distorting what the law has always been because they wanted to wish him away.
NO SHE IS NOT.
Neither of her parents were citizens of this country when she was born.
Technically she is a citizen of Jamaica......thru her father.
Unclear about her Indian mother & status there.
This is an excellent read on the Minor v. Happersett case. Among other things, it incorporated women into the legal definition of citizens.
It also defines citizen as someone born of citizen parents (plural!). Neither of Sen. Harris’ parents were ‘citizen parents’ of the US.
Reference, should you care to read instead of post garbage -
The 14th Amendment ONLY applies to the offspring of slaves...
Ntural Born is in the Constitution......much earlier.
Sorry friend. But you are mistaken. There is a long legal history of several hundred citable years on this. It is like trying to compare apples and oranges - they simply are different things in the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.