Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RideForever
"... and subject to a foreign jurisdiction which you have yet to explain why it doesn't apply. In fact, you avoid the argument in all your posts."

You obviously haven't seen all my posts.

"In fact, you seem to be factless in all your posts."

You really haven't seen all my posts. But even the ones you have are not factless. You just disagree with them.

"Perhaps you should read more and post less. Start with Minor v. Happersett (SCOTUS)."

Been there, done that. It doesn't say what birthers want it to say.

44 posted on 12/15/2020 1:41:04 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: mlo

This is an excellent read on the Minor v. Happersett case. Among other things, it incorporated women into the legal definition of citizens.

It also defines citizen as someone born of citizen parents (plural!). Neither of Sen. Harris’ parents were ‘citizen parents’ of the US.

Reference, should you care to read instead of post garbage -

https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/06/24/minor-v-happersett-is-binding-precedent-as-to-the-constitutional-definition-of-a-natural-born-citizen/


58 posted on 12/15/2020 2:05:37 PM PST by RideForever (We were born to be tested)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson