Posted on 12/02/2020 1:30:26 AM PST by BEJ
New Civil War
I believe Trump will win this election battle and his next of his four years will be like the American Civil War (1860-1864). It will be four years of Trump waging Civil War II mostly against big business, Big Tech (Facebook, Google, Twitter, etc.), the deep state and the mainstream media. It will not be typically a battle involving geography, as North vs. South in the first Civil War (despite the idea of coastal vs. flyover territory). It will be a battle mostly fought in the courts. It will be a battle to preserve the intuitions that traditionally make America a Republic in accordance with its Constitution. Like Lincoln, Trump will have four years to wage war with people already within the country who are seeking to radically change or destroy the country, even through fraudulent means. This is more than just a coup of President Trump, but a coup of the country. This coup will fundamentally change the character of the country. Immediate change will mean added judges to Supreme Court, creation of new states, e.g., D.C., Porto Rico, removal of the filibuster, 1769 Project in schools, no borders, etc. Trump will have to first clean his house and then clean the country. Let us hope and pray he doesn’t end up like the first Lincoln because the enemy will have only one thing left to throw at him.
Who Is the Criminal Master Mind?
One of Trump’s first tasks will be find out who can coordinate widespread voter fraud across many states. Who would have the technical knowledge, the money, the resources and organization sufficient to work across multiple states in one strategic strike of voter fraud? Were there months of intense planning and practice runs? Was there a war room somewhere in the country coordinating everything in real time? For example, trucks of completed illegal ballots for Biden were transported across state lines with calls being made between the trucker (now whistleblower) and his coordinator. I can only suspect that this kind of massive organizational ability would come from some part of the government, parts of the intelligence community or the military.
Joe Biden
Joe Biden may be prophetic is some unaccountable ways. He called Trump Lincoln in the debates and he told the truth about having a massive voting fraud organization. He may be like a pleasant fool and sly fox, but because he has now been hollowed out perhaps other voices speak through him – including the prophetic voice coming out of his foolishness.
Trump like Moses
If Trump does not win this election, he will be like Mosses. Moss’ tribe enters the New Land but Mosses was forced to stay behind. Trump’s Republicans have new people in his party, new people entering government, breaking voter records – but he may not the president. Let’s hope it never happens. If this happens, it is not a New Land but a fraudulent land… the land of the Lie.
Amen to that.
Agree. People need to stop thinking 1861 and start thinking asymmetric warfare.
Yeah, you’re right about the long march. The universities are the bastions of the Left. It’s through them that leftist thought pervades society because students who attend university go into all walks of life: law, the courts, media, business, government, arts, education, Hollywood, etc. It’s the university that started this whole thing back when they embraced the Frankfurt School and Post Modernism. Leftist though became fashionable and everybody was reciting the gibberish. If I get started on this I will never end. But this has been a problem that people knew about for a long time — at least since the 1980s — and hardly nobody was willing to do anything about it... but talk. Now you have BLM being lionized by the public and big business. Incredible.
I’m thinking there has to be a chain of command and a leader on top of the criminal organization. Basically, they are traitors. But they won’t be treated that way and investigated like other criminal or terrorist organizations. I think if the DOJ wanted they could trace it all back to the top, but who would they find... probably their own people or intel agencies or military. That’s why Bar wants to stay out of this. He is opening a HUGE CAN of WORMS. Our own people and government agencies are involved in this.
“They already control those states, may as well let them pick up the tab for their run away social programs.”
Reestablish the rule of law and the Constitution in those states and they won’t be running them.
Your “succession”[sic] idea is like moving out of your house and leaving your stuff behind because somebody broke in. You are rewarding criminal theft of the country. What makes you thing they won’t come for you as soon as they have ruined what you gave them as tribute? It’s what they do. And who are you to trade the lives and fortunes of millions of your fellow citizens for your convenience? Get off your lazy, surrender-monkey ass and find a way to fight.
“Have the main traitors arrested as he speaks - FROM BOTH PARTIES.”
Anybody that needs to redundantly shout out “FROM BOTH PARTIES” is a tinfoil merchant.
If it is treason, it is treason, and party is irrelevant. Buying the left’s smear with the need to taint the right on every occasion is either shallow thinking or an agenda (which is it? Both?) Why else would you promote the both “parties are bad” line all the time?
your premise is flawed
you’re assuming “we all want war”
i see where you’ve gone full nutter butters
I think you nailed it .... lots of walking around a space rock out there
It is possible to criticize individual Republicans, or even the individual actions of individual Republicans, without dumping on ALL Republicans. All dumping on all Republicans gets you is to be dismissed as a crank. Not that we don’t have plenty of those around here, but portraying everybody as the bad guy and everybody that has a different viewpoint than you as evil just alienates people.
Using the term RINO (Republican in name only) is the usual way to ensure not all Republicans are “dumped on”. RINOs have many common characteristics that they are not afraid to flaunt, to boot. The other term is “establishment”, sometimes written as “GOP-e” for short.
The truly ghoulish thing is to trade the lives and fortunes of others so you can have “peace”. You don’t get to do that.
As if they won’t come for the rest when they’ve ruined what they stole prior.
“Using the term RINO (Republican in name only) is the usual way to ensure not all Republicans are “dumped on”. RINOs have many common characteristics that they are not afraid to flaunt, to boot. The other term is “establishment”, sometimes written as “GOP-e” for short.”
Don’t be condescending. I know the lingo. Many people are sloppy in the use of it.
Perhaps you’ve not noticed the entrenched shallow thinkers that feel obligated to spout “BOTH PARTIES” when making a criticism of the actions of individuals. Or that all Republicans get bashed as if they all agree with what ever policy the poster is taking exception to. As I said, lumping everybody together just alienates people. Some of the shallow thinkers are downright authoritarian in their perspective, including many so-called Libertarians.
I am a registered Republican. When somebody that also happens to be a Republican makes some statement or takes some action that the aforementioned shallow thinkers don’t like and they respond bashing all Republicans, that’s an attack on me and the millions of Republicans that were not even consulted before being lumped in with the original offender. Not every Republican that disagrees with you is a RINO or GOPe or Establishment or a Swamp denizen. Not every Republican necessarily agrees with the RINO offender of the moment.
Often these things that get the shallow thinkers riled up are legitimate differences of opinion within the spectrum of the Republican outlook. As if said shallow thinkers have the only legitimate view, and anybody that disagrees is a heretic, whether to the left or to the right. I can point out many examples of this.
So please don’t pedantically lecture me on terminology that everybody knows but few strictly apply.
Continue to lecture, you only prove my point.
Define “conservatism”.
“Argumentum ad lapidem. And no conservative would ask the question of defining conservatism, knowing that its definition in the context of US jurisprudence as established at its founding is neither ambiguous nor relativistic.”
Evasion.
“There goes that haghty do not lecture me attitude characteristic of a liberal, again. I admit I do not know everything; time for you to admit that, especially to and of yourself.”
Projection.
Keep on lecturing, as, again, you are proving my point for me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.