Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: calenel
Just because I repeated the “lingo” did not mean I intended to condescend; you, however, now imply that all such “lingo” taints the whole brand, which is condescension.

It is not incorrect to say “both parties” (no shouting) when the actions of a majority of one particular party overshadow the stated party platform. Yes, it does reflect upon all members, since the truly conservative members now look like they gave tacit approval.

Your insistence on promoting the party name over the ideology of conservatism is where you go wrong, with all due respect. You need to get over that. And if you feel that you are being lectured, then you need to get over that as well. Also, read the books The Conscience of a Conservative and The Naked Communist to see what has been going on for several decades—yes, with the GOP.
74 posted on 12/04/2020 10:11:55 AM PST by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

Continue to lecture, you only prove my point.

Define “conservatism”.


75 posted on 12/04/2020 11:47:29 AM PST by calenel (Tree of Liberty is thirsty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson