Posted on 11/27/2020 11:34:10 AM PST by Golden Eagle
Thanks for the answers which came in while I was typing.
The poster was probably confusing affidavits (written testimony) with in-person depositions. At the time of writing such documents, there is no "cross examination". That only occurs in court. Legal types?
We’ll see what happens. Standing is a moving target in the courts. I think you would have to have a judiciary that does not have a clear bias in favor biden. I personally don’t believe the SCOTUS has any desire to see Trump have a second term. I mean we have clearly fraudulent votes and procedures, yet it is being ignored. I pray there’s a chance but I just don’t see it. Every force of government, executive agencies, the legislative branch and the judiciary are aligned against Trump. Add to that the sources of information for most Americans in tech and msm are also aligned against Trump.
I don’t think so. Hearsay is what the testifying person hears someone else say. Here, the testifying witness is testifying to what he saw himself.
No, they are not the equivalent of testimony at trial because they are considered hearsay. They can be used as evidence for some purposes, such as to support your self-proving will, but are not admissible at trial unless they fall into one of the exceptions to the hearsay rule.
Side not: To qualify as an affidavit, a document must be signed and notarized with a jurat that states that the document was signed under oath and that the affidavit’s identity was known to the notary, and the affidavit must state that the facts stated in the affidavit are true and correct. However, both federal law and at least some states’ laws now allow “unsworn declarations,” signed under penalty of perjury without a notary to be used in place of an affidavit.
Wasn’t that from one county. Can they call them or ask them if they live in that county to contact Wood. Getting to the bottom of it quickly would be awesome. I think people are going to start coming forward and flipping soon. They are getting nervous. Next stop is PA. Let’s blow that up soon..
The headline is so misleading that it paints a completely different picture from the truth. That’s not nitpicking.
They know that open court testimony is much more powerful than an affidavit. That’s why why they said it that way.
It’s trash tabloid journalism.
Evidence, please. Just holding you to your own standard of accuracy, of course. Thanks.
What did I say negative about Trump?
Quote me.
Do you think this clickbait crap helps him?
And if it goes to court, the authors of the affidavits can be required to testify in person.
Gateway Pundit overstates things all the time, but this is nothing on that scale. Affidavits are testimony.
Lin Wood was granted a hearing on his matter.
Testified to who? That requires a swearing in or an oath. I believe everyone is confusing affidavits with depositions. I don't know of or last track of any of the lawsuits (most dismissed) that had actual court in-person testimony.
Yes. There are a lot of bombshell affidavits though.
And I can’t wait for them to testify if they’re given a chance.
My point is be honest in reporting.
“I love Powell. But why did she not bring all this up in a State court before going to the federal court? Or she could even had brought them in parallel. Barnes and a couple of other pretty reputable attorneys are saying the federal courts will throw these out for lack of standing. It has already happened to Lin Wood.”
Wood’s case was tossed for lack of standing prior to certification and refiled after certification. The law clearly states that any elector (voter) has standing to challenge the certification. Has the second suit been tossed for lack of standing as well?
Lin Wood has got feelers out for military that voted in Fulton County, and there is a contingent of military veterans looking into it.
If true, prima facia evidence of ballot stuffing, a well know FRAUDULANT election stealing technique.
Again, I hope I am wrong, I have been before. But that is how I see it. We’ll know more definitively in January.
Well that is when vigilante justice to the treason media, on a one on one basis, comes in to play. Think Seth Rich.
bttt
Most Repubs would rather lose graciously than win ugly. They are all so above this fighting in the mud, thank God Trump isn’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.