The headline is so misleading that it paints a completely different picture from the truth. That’s not nitpicking.
They know that open court testimony is much more powerful than an affidavit. That’s why why they said it that way.
It’s trash tabloid journalism.
Hundreds of sworn affidavits by witnesses to serious wrongdoing is very powerful.
No one has refuted the facts in a single sworn affidavit.
This is extremely powerful evidence. The irrelevant nitpicking you do does not address any of the substantive evidence of fraud.