Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The giant Antonov An-124 Ruslan Condor suffered an uncontained engine failure after take off from Novosibirsk that forced the aircraft to perform an emergency landing.
the aviationist ^ | 11/13/2020 | DAVID CENCIOTTI

Posted on 11/14/2020 8:23:22 AM PST by WhoisAlanGreenspan?

An Antonov An-124 Ruslan (NATO reporting name: Condor), belonging to Volga-Dnepr Airlines, an airline based in Ulyanovsk, Russia, and specialized in air charter services, with 14 people on board, overran the end of the runway at Novosibirsk, Russia, on Nov. 13, 2020.

The aircraft, registration RA-82042, experienced what has been reported as an uncontained engine failure during the initial climb after take off from RWY 25 at Novosibirisk. The crew returned for an emergency landing on the same runway and performed a successful and seemingly normal touchdown but did not manage to stop the landing roll (the aircraft was loaded with fuel and probably the breaking action, if available following the failure, could not be used to slow down the heavy plane): the aircraft went off the tarmac by about 200 meters.

No one was injured but the aircraft was heavily damaged.

(Excerpt) Read more at theaviationist.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: aviation; aviationsafety; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Several years ago I saw one of these AN-124 monsters flying into Detroit Metro Airport while I was golfing. Being an aviation buff and living so close to a major airport, you notice when things look or sound unusual.

Months or maybe a year after that I found out Antonov was flying a heavy generator part for the Ford Rouge Plant which needed repair.

There's more info and pics at The Daily Mail

1 posted on 11/14/2020 8:23:22 AM PST by WhoisAlanGreenspan?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

You gotta hand it to the Rooskies. When they go big they really go big. I saw one of these monsters once. It was incredible.


2 posted on 11/14/2020 8:26:35 AM PST by Wilderness Conservative (Nature is the ultimate conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

Been one, on the ground. Shipping Patriot ground equipment (radar and engagement control station) from Dover NH to Riyadh. They make an impressive sight landing.


3 posted on 11/14/2020 8:30:50 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets ("Women's intuition" gave us the Salem witch trials and Kavanaugh hearings. Change my mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

Whoahhhhh... that is a “clean your pants out after landing” landing!! Thank God they could control the aircraft!


4 posted on 11/14/2020 8:35:06 AM PST by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Cool.

Lockheed C-5A capacity 127.5 tons
Antonov AN-124 capacity 150 tons
Antonov AN-225 capacity 250 tons - now that is big!

5 posted on 11/14/2020 8:36:39 AM PST by WhoisAlanGreenspan? (Keep looking up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: missnry

Yep. Looks like scrap metal and some spare parts to me.


6 posted on 11/14/2020 8:38:20 AM PST by WhoisAlanGreenspan? (Keep looking up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

I’m glad the crew was okay.

That thing can carry an incredible amount of weight.

Isn’t it interesting that “air” can hold so much?


7 posted on 11/14/2020 8:42:27 AM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?
Months or maybe a year after that I found out Antonov was flying a heavy generator part for the Ford Rouge Plant which needed repair.

I've had the privilege of seeing these massive machines on a couple of navy bases. I saw one land. It seemed like I was watching it approach forever. It just kept getting bigger and bigger. The U.S. Navy leases them from time to time to move stuff that the C-5 Galaxy can't.

8 posted on 11/14/2020 8:42:38 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?
Yep. Looks like scrap metal and some spare parts to me.

Yep. It's done. Its airframe will never again be flightworthy.

9 posted on 11/14/2020 8:43:22 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

I rode one of these into Iraq, there are 2 upper deck areas, one for the crew helpers the other for the pilots. 22 hours from AZ to Bashra.

I had some fun ITARS interviews over that.


10 posted on 11/14/2020 8:43:29 AM PST by where's_the_Outrage? (Drain the Swamp. Build the Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

Congratulations to the crew - excellent job of piloting! Try to imagine an emergency landing missing that much of your electronics.... Damn.

Hard to imagine the airframe damage after seeing that last photo.


11 posted on 11/14/2020 8:45:59 AM PST by datura (If you have to cheat, you didn'tÂ’ win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

The apparent failure of braking to stop the plane with a full load of fuel. I wonder if they’d ever tested it for that possibility? Reminds me of following the videos of Boeing during the design, build and testing of the 777. Alan Mullally was the head honcho of the project. One of the final tests was to load the craft with max cargo, plus the equivalent of a full fuel load, and then do an “emergency” landing with full brakes and thrust reversers. When it came to a stop, the brakes were on fire and the landing gear would need some work, but it stayed on the runway. (Mullally later was recruited by Ford to turn around THEIR lagging fortunes, which he did, sorta).

Did the Ruskies ever test for that? Maybe they didn’t want to know...but NOW they know. BTW: What IS an uncontained engine failure? That it blew the cowling off and scattered parts all over the south 40?


12 posted on 11/14/2020 8:46:10 AM PST by Tucker39 ("It is impossible so to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible." George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Aviation geek Sam Chui rode in one.

https://youtu.be/5FSyTuY1rGg


13 posted on 11/14/2020 8:47:40 AM PST by Fai Mao (There is no justice until PIAPPS is hanging from a gallows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

I used to watch these guys as they flew in and out of Boeing field Seattle.
They rum their engines for about 5 minutes at the end of the runway, at full throttle to get them up to temperature before taking off. It seems they have a problem with compressor stalls A.K.A. surges. if you have ever seen a surge they are very spectacular. The can also destroy an engine very quickly.
I wonder if the pilot got in a bit of a hurry that day.


14 posted on 11/14/2020 8:48:23 AM PST by rellic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

15 posted on 11/14/2020 8:49:25 AM PST by datura (If you have to cheat, you didn'tÂ’ win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

“Uncontained” means the turbine or fan blades broke through the structural engine housing that is meant to contain those parts if they break off the rotor. They exit at high velocity with a lot of energy and do a lot of damage to wings, fuselage, and controls.


16 posted on 11/14/2020 9:08:42 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom ("Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out" -- David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?
I especially like the way the pilot made a right turn at the end onto the highway...


17 posted on 11/14/2020 9:10:38 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom ("Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out" -- David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?
Wow. You can see the uncontained engine failure on the inboard starboard engine. Imagine overrunning the runway by 600 meters -- almost 0.4 miles! "OK baby, time to stop. STOP I said."


18 posted on 11/14/2020 9:15:22 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom ("Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out" -- David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

19 posted on 11/14/2020 9:16:03 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhoisAlanGreenspan?

The aircraft has a massive engine failure on takeoff and returns for an emergency landing. Watch the video and you see NO emergency vehicles waiting along the runway and adjacent taxiways. After the plane overruns the runway, it takes quite a while for vehicles to begin heading toward the aircraft and I don’t see any emergency vehicles or firefighting apparatus. That seems very odd.


20 posted on 11/14/2020 9:20:33 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom ("Inside Every Progressive Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out" -- David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson