Dr Shiva Ayyadurai, MIT PHD: Our analysis in Michigan indicates a computer algorithm was likely used to transfer 69,000 votes. We are willing to subject our results to a critical & transparent review

Twitter ^

[Bigtigermike]

Mr. President @realDonaldTrump & Mr. Biden @JoeBiden

Our analysis in Michigan indicates a computer algorithm was likely used to transfer 69,000 votes. We are willing to subject our results to a critical & transparent review with your representatives. Are you open?

-Dr. Shiva

[circlecity]

Shiva isn’t the only MIT statistical analyst out there. He explains the methodology and source of the data. Peer review his findings and if they are as sound as he says then go with it in court. He is pretty persuasive to me. The lineal descent of the curve as you get into more and more Republican districts could not happen.

[circlecity]

Did he say whether these were the only 4 counties he studied or did he study the whole state and cherry pick these counties to make his case?

[Vermont Lt]

Try explaining that to the mob. They aren’t interested in anything objective. Just wait. It’s gonna get more fun.

[rebuildus]

Thanks, Bigtigermike. I saw this presentation and it’s a mindblower—clear as day that massive fraud was perpetuated with a computer program or programs. And he only looked at 4 counties.

They need to check the whole state, and every single battleground state, and see if they used these programs.

Also, I’m shocked at some of the responses from Freepers here. I’ve been around here a long time, and many of today’s Freepers don’t think straight. I believe they actually WANT to lose, so they can continue to bitch at everything.

This information is YUGE! But you’d never know it from many of the responses here.

[cdcdawg]

This is just the “baked in” cheating that Trump overcame last time. It’s not the middle of the night stuff.

[circlecity]

Shiva vid no longer loads for me on 2 different computers on youtube. May have got taken down.

[Pete from Shawnee Mission]

Well, I have to admit that I do not have any first hand information about Dr. Shiva other than the story, so I’ll rely on your observations about him and how a court would view him. Thank you.

It might be good if he could provide someone else his analysis to relay to the Trump legal team.

[Steven W.]

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/

Dominion Voting Systems :

Pennsylvania : Switched : 220,883 Lost Votes : 941,248
New Jersey : Switched : 80,242 Lost Votes : 20
Florida : Switched : 21,422 Lost Votes : 456
Michigan : Switched : 20,213 Lost Votes : 21,882
New York : Switched : 18,124 Lost Votes : 623,213
Georgia : Switched : 17,407 Lost Votes : 33,574
Ohio : Switched : 14,965 Lost Votes : 5,102
Virginia : Switched : 12,163 Lost Votes : 789,023
California : Switched : 7,701 Lost Votes : 10,989
Arizona : Switched : 4,492 Lost Votes : 0
Minnesota : Switched : 2,766 Lost Votes : 195,650
Tennessee : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 0
Louisiana : Switched : 2,322 Lost Votes : 0
Illinois : Switched : 2,166 Lost Votes : 54,730
Wisconsin : Switched : 2,078 Lost Votes : 3,408
Colorado : Switched : 1,809 Lost Votes : 0
Utah : Switched : 1,627 Lost Votes : 0
New Hampshire : Switched : 973 Lost Votes : 116
Iowa : Switched : 938 Lost Votes : 477
New Mexico : Switched : 268 Lost Votes : 4,610
Missouri : Switched 0 : Lost Votes : 20,730
Nevada : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Alaska : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Washington : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Hawaii : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Kansas and Texas use Premier Election Solutions, owned by Dominion Voting Systems.

Texas : Switched : 14,954 Lost Votes : 30,557
Kansas : Switched : 1,674 Lost Votes : 2,154

Election Systems & Software :

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Kentucky : Switched : 8,129 Lost Votes : 23,849
Arkansas : Switched : 3,664 Lost Votes : 20,748
South Carolina : Switched : 2,779 Lost Votes : 2,119
Montana : Switched : 2,330 Lost Votes : 1,276
South Dakota : Switched : 1,347 Lost Votes : 1
North Dakota : Switched : 234 Lost Votes : 681
Maryland : Switched : 203 Lost Votes : 0
North Carolina : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 15
District of Columbia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

Unknown Systems:

Nebraska : Switched : 30,086 Lost Votes : 50
Connecticut : Switched : 3,834 Lost Votes : 272
Massachusetts : Switched : 3,613 Lost Votes : 51
Oregon : Switched 2,557 Lost Votes : 0
Alabama : Switched : 1,170 Lost Votes : 408
Mississippi : Switched : 355 Lost Votes : 0
Maine : Switched : 271 Lost Votes : 35
Rhode Island : Switched : 6 Lost Votes : 13
West Virginia : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 78,300
Idaho : Switched 0 Lost Votes : 0
Oklahoma : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Indiana : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Delaware : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0
Vermont : Switched : 0 Lost Votes : 0

NOTE : Lost votes are votes that disappeared, not only for Trump, but overall.

[Eagles6]

Watch his video.

[Bigtigermike]

Just saw that YouTube is down

[Steven W.]

https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1326621641699438592

Lin Wood
@LLinWood

More TRUTH.

The evidence is irrefutable. Soon people will be going to prison. Lots of people.

https://noqreport.com/2020/11/11/data-deep-dive-on-dominion-voting-systems-offers-incontrovertible-proof-of-election-hack/

[Vermont Lt]

I’ve read the presentation.

It was interesting.

But he is the wrong guy to hold up as an “expert.” That’s all I am saying.

You guys are so blinded in your rage that you are unable to be objective. I get it. But you are also acting surprised by all this. Who didn’t see all of this coming?

[Database]

I haven’t recreated the analysis from the voting data, but I wasn’t convinced that their claim that the distribution patterns they calculated couldn’t be due to something other than algorithmic cheating.

So I did some simple calculations in a spreadsheet that assumes that a uniform percentage of non-straight-line voting was done in order to crossover on the vote for president. The result is, for any level of R crossovers voting for Biden, the graph will show the linear fall of in vote advantage for Trump.

So, there is an argument for another cause for their result. That doesn’t mean there is no fraud, but it may mean that their analysis doesn’t prove there was fraud.

If anyone wants a copy of my simple spreadsheet, drop me a freep mail with an email address. I would appreciate someone double checking it.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Dr Shiva Ayyadurai thinks he invented email.

He did.

Along with a few other people but he was one of the ones who did it.

[BigEdLB]

I think this study actually is the proof of Hammer-Scorecard tha Gen MacInerny is talking about. The way it is proven is that Hammer and scorecard looks like it can’t handle a straight party vote and only when people vote for individual candidates. Hammer and scorecard is used at the precinct level in a way that makes it hard to detect

[BigEdLB]

Proof of Hammer and Scorecard. Looks like Hammer and Scorecard can’t handle straight party voting so you get a divergence

[Jonny7797]

thanks for the lesson in mathematics.

[linMcHlp]

October 1, 2021

‘Audit’ expert Shiva Ayyadurai didn’t understand election procedures. He made a number of false signature claims.

https://www.azmirror.com/2021/10/01/audit-expert-shiva-ayyadurai-didnt-understand-election-procedures-he-made-a-number-of-false-signature-claims/