HAMMER and SCORECARD are part of a disinformation campaign.
If these applications ever existed as described, they would be completely out of date by now and ineffective. Moreover, in States that use paper ballots, basic audits would reveal discrepancies that would expose such activities.
It's a head fake.
The Democrat campaign plan is to undermine confidence in the election counts, file lawsuits, delay certifications, and perform "recounts" until their candidates are declared "winners". Same as it ever was. They have been quite open about their plans.
The primary risk is boxes of "found" ballots that appear by the truckload after the election deadline has passed. The usual 160% "turnout" in Democrat precincts will also be a factor as well as a stampede of "provisional" ballots from unverified sources.
A secondary risk is from logistical disruptions of polling places that will tend to prevent voters from casting their ballots. This would presumably eliminate more Republican than Democrat votes. (or maybe not)
The counter to the Democrat plan is to prevent the endless "recounts" and to de-certify States from the Electoral College if the lawsuits delay things past December 14.
Planned riots by ANTIFA and BLM forces must be quickly suppressed.
Lt. Gen. Tom McInerney is the one who is warning that the Dems and the CIA have put in place a mechanism which can alter the voting results of electronic voting machines in key swing states.
Are you saying he is part of a disinformation campaign? It’s a serious question as I do not know much about him.
You are assuming that there aren’t devilish people in the CIA that can update it.
I think Trump should do what Kennedy threatened to do before he was killed.
splinter them into a thousand pieces- may be folklore...but maybe Trump can make it happen
Maybe, maybe not.
All states using paper ballots put them through multiple phases of a scanning machine that first takes a picture of the signature and mark the ballot as received.
The second phase does an electronic comparison of the signature against the one on file - or other ones that exist from various sources.
The ballots are then read by machine, with the results stored in a way that election staff "cannot" get access until poll closing on election day.
Any ballots that have extraneous marks are then sent to a bipartisan team to determine voter intent, if possible.
Any signatures that cannot be verified are sent to people to manually check them - and to a bipartisan team if it still presents a problem.
There are a number of places along this "pretty good" pipeline where fraud can take place.
The ballot reader is a point of fraud. The single person verifying signatures that don't automatically match is a point of fraud. The votes being tallied prior to election day is a point of fraud if numbers can somehow be accessed.
As I said, the system if pretty good - but it's far from perfect - and this is in a state where they try to do a good job.
It’s real! Listen starting at Episode 470 about 19:06 of War Room today.
General McInerny talks all about this.
Obama used it in 2012. They used it on the Dem primary to get Biden. They tried to use it the night of 2016 election but something went wrong and General McInerny will not state why that happened.
Obama, Clapper, Brennan, Comey to name a few who created these software programs.
Wake up! My gosh, this is serious!
Beginning with this current election, California stopped with paper ballots. You put a scan-tron sheet in a scanner, and there is no paper trail.