The Chief of the U.S. Army Center of Military has adopted the Leftist "woke" "1619 Project" and Howard Zinn as its new guidance in writing the official history of the U.S. Army.
1 posted on
10/28/2020 11:33:41 AM PDT by
GreyFriar
To: GreyFriar; archy; xzins; SandRat; HarleyLady27; BlackFemaleArmyColonel; Interesting Times; ...
The future state of the official history of the US Army as it will now be written by historians belonging to the U.S. Army Center of Military History.
2 posted on
10/28/2020 11:36:14 AM PDT by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: GreyFriar
5 posted on
10/28/2020 11:50:20 AM PDT by
Seruzawa
(TANSTAAFL!)
To: GreyFriar
Mr. Bowery is responsible for the overall supervision and direction of historical matters throughout the Department of the Army, which includes management of fifty-seven Army museums and more than thirty historical centers, and overall supervision of the Armys operational and deployed military historians and military history detachments. As the Chief of Military History, Mr. Bowery plans, formulates, and executes the Army Historical Program, and supervises the production of Army historical works and studies that support the Armys development of plans, policies, doctrine, force structure, and equipment. The CMH advises the Secretary and Chief of Staff of the Army and other Army Senior Leaders on historical background relevant to events and projected actions affecting the Army. This man should be fired at President Trump's earliest convenience.
With his view of military history as evidenced above he is likely to do great damage to the US Armed Service if he continues in his position.
6 posted on
10/28/2020 11:52:49 AM PDT by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
To: GreyFriar
“. . . chose to fight against this country in the service of a new country that promised to preserve chattel slavery.”
The Congress of the “old” country promised to preserve chattel slavery too.
In fact, the U.S. Constitution was pro-slavery and President Lincoln - twice - took an oath to preserve and defend the pro-slavery Constitution.
How long before this chief leads the effort to destroy the Lincoln and Washington monuments?
To: GreyFriar
“We have ended exclusions of LGBTQ citizens from serving openly . . .”
This tells you everything you need to know about this person’s perspective. Not good, that I can tell you.
To: GreyFriar
Why, MAJOR Bowery thought quite highly of Robert E. Lee.
Looks like someone talked to him.
9 posted on
10/28/2020 11:59:47 AM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
To: GreyFriar
If slavery was our original sin then it couldnt be racist. The first slaves were poor white adults and kids abducted from the streets of England (not even counting the indentured servants).
10 posted on
10/28/2020 12:09:09 PM PDT by
Tell It Right
(1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
To: GreyFriar
Just looking at the overview of his service record and reading his ribbon bar, Mr. Bowery appears to have had a nice, safe noncombat army career.
And maybe living under the radar during the "don't ask, don't tell" period.
11 posted on
10/28/2020 12:22:14 PM PDT by
Chainmail
(Remember that half the people you meet are below average intelligence)
To: GreyFriar; All
All,
Please note the link goes to the title page for Army History magazine. Click on the link below Bryan Hockensmith’s intro to the pdf of the magazine and the Chief’s Corner is on page 4. Army History Magazine: Fall 2020 Edition
My apologies,
G-F
13 posted on
10/28/2020 12:35:19 PM PDT by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: GreyFriar
This guy is in direct violation of the President’s recent Executive Order. Someone should forward this screed to the Administration.
14 posted on
10/28/2020 1:02:14 PM PDT by
Interesting Times
(WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
To: GreyFriar
He died of a fentanyl overdose, crackhead. Stop spreading lies.
17 posted on
10/28/2020 2:00:51 PM PDT by
Trillian
To: GreyFriar
The Army is shaped by the party in power during its time in power. This is especially true in the higher ranks that require nomination and congressional approval. Ultimately, though, as President Lincoln found, the object of an Army is to win wars. It took a long, bloody search before Lincoln could identify Grant as a warrior who wins. We had the same issue in WWII with Patton and Eisenhower. After a while, winning was the ultimate issue for an Army.
Political appointments and promotions aren’t necessarily good fighters. Pretending every soldier has the same physical or mental ability does not make it so, and thus it injures the warfighting capability of a unit.
The purpose of our military is to win wars. Period.
23 posted on
11/02/2020 8:18:01 AM PST by
xzins
(Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson