Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

The Chief of the U.S. Army Center of Military has adopted the Leftist "woke" "1619 Project" and Howard Zinn as its new guidance in writing the official history of the U.S. Army.
1 posted on 10/28/2020 11:33:41 AM PDT by GreyFriar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GreyFriar; archy; xzins; SandRat; HarleyLady27; BlackFemaleArmyColonel; Interesting Times; ...

The future state of the official history of the US Army as it will now be written by historians belonging to the U.S. Army Center of Military History.


2 posted on 10/28/2020 11:36:14 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar

5 posted on 10/28/2020 11:50:20 AM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar
Mr. Bowery is responsible for the overall supervision and direction of historical matters throughout the Department of the Army, which includes management of fifty-seven Army museums and more than thirty historical centers, and overall supervision of the Army’s operational and deployed military historians and military history detachments. As the Chief of Military History, Mr. Bowery plans, formulates, and executes the Army Historical Program, and supervises the production of Army historical works and studies that support the Army’s development of plans, policies, doctrine, force structure, and equipment. The CMH advises the Secretary and Chief of Staff of the Army and other Army Senior Leaders on historical background relevant to events and projected actions affecting the Army.

This man should be fired at President Trump's earliest convenience.

With his view of military history as evidenced above he is likely to do great damage to the US Armed Service if he continues in his position.

6 posted on 10/28/2020 11:52:49 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar

“. . . chose to fight against this country in the service of a new country that promised to preserve chattel slavery.”

The Congress of the “old” country promised to preserve chattel slavery too.

In fact, the U.S. Constitution was pro-slavery and President Lincoln - twice - took an oath to preserve and defend the pro-slavery Constitution.

How long before this chief leads the effort to destroy the Lincoln and Washington monuments?


7 posted on 10/28/2020 11:54:13 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar

“We have ended exclusions of LGBTQ citizens from serving openly . . .”

This tells you everything you need to know about this person’s perspective. Not good, that I can tell you.


8 posted on 10/28/2020 11:57:56 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar

Why, MAJOR Bowery thought quite highly of Robert E. Lee.

Looks like someone talked to him.


9 posted on 10/28/2020 11:59:47 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar

If slavery was our original sin then it couldn’t be racist. The first slaves were poor white adults and kids abducted from the streets of England (not even counting the indentured servants).


10 posted on 10/28/2020 12:09:09 PM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar
Just looking at the overview of his service record and reading his ribbon bar, Mr. Bowery appears to have had a nice, safe noncombat army career.

And maybe living under the radar during the "don't ask, don't tell" period.

11 posted on 10/28/2020 12:22:14 PM PDT by Chainmail (Remember that half the people you meet are below average intelligence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar; All

All,

Please note the link goes to the title page for Army History magazine. Click on the link below Bryan Hockensmith’s intro to the pdf of the magazine and the Chief’s Corner is on page 4. Army History Magazine: Fall 2020 Edition

My apologies,

G-F


13 posted on 10/28/2020 12:35:19 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar

This guy is in direct violation of the President’s recent Executive Order. Someone should forward this screed to the Administration.


14 posted on 10/28/2020 1:02:14 PM PDT by Interesting Times (WinterSoldier.com. SwiftVets.com. ToSetTheRecordStraight.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar

He died of a fentanyl overdose, crackhead. Stop spreading lies.


17 posted on 10/28/2020 2:00:51 PM PDT by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GreyFriar

The Army is shaped by the party in power during its time in power. This is especially true in the higher ranks that require nomination and congressional approval. Ultimately, though, as President Lincoln found, the object of an Army is to win wars. It took a long, bloody search before Lincoln could identify Grant as a warrior who wins. We had the same issue in WWII with Patton and Eisenhower. After a while, winning was the ultimate issue for an Army.

Political appointments and promotions aren’t necessarily good fighters. Pretending every soldier has the same physical or mental ability does not make it so, and thus it injures the warfighting capability of a unit.

The purpose of our military is to win wars. Period.


23 posted on 11/02/2020 8:18:01 AM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson