Posted on 10/01/2020 12:08:34 AM PDT by weston
I’m a CPA & tax preparer, but you are right I rarely use the term pre-pay taxes. Sometimes, tbut hey are most commonly referred to as estimates, or estimated tax payments. Less common as quarterlies.
Having said that, ANYBODY would know that if somebody said “pre-paid taxes” they mentioned estimates.
As with other words, there are local vernacular. Such as soda/pop/Cokes. Everybody knows what each mean, if they have a brain.
Also Trump might have referred to them a pre-paid because to a business person/accountant/financial person , they are always recorded in the books as a Pre-Paid Expense. It is an account ting standard, and the precise term
That lady is just an idiot.
I hope Jack shows it to everybody. Get the word out.
Lou Dobbs showing trailer & prompting the movie.
Dobbs also said Rs on the House Judiciary (I think) Committee blocking releasing documents Nunes & Ratcliff want to get out.
Thanks for the explanation, gub.
Are they actually blocking or just drawing attention to the documents and will “cave” when it’s time to move! Actions are not always what they appear to be!
Jim Jordan
Ranking Member
Republican Members
F. James Sensenbrenner
WI-05
Steve Chabot
OH-01
Louie Gohmert
TX-01
Doug Collins
GA-09
Ken Buck
CO-04
Martha Roby
AL-02
Matt Gaetz
FL-01
Mike Johnson
LA-04
Andy Biggs
AZ-05
Tom McClintock
CA-04
Debbie Lesko
AZ-08
Guy Reschenthaler
PA-14
Ben Cline
VA-06
Kelly Armstrong
ND-00
W. Gregory Steube
FL-17
Tom Tiffany
WI-07
Thanks.
Senate Cloakroom
@SenateCloakroom
· Oct 22
Confirmed, 67-30: Executive Calendar #866 Michael Jay Newman to be U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio.
1) On this question of Joe Biden being somehow exonerated on the China deal, how so? WSJ news story correctly notes that his name isn't on documents. But those docs also suggest special care had been taken to make sure his name WASN'T visible.— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) October 23, 2020
2) The doc w/proposed equity stakes said Hunter was going to hold 10% for the "big guy." Tony Bobulinski, Hunter's partner, says the big guy is Joe--and Bobulinski presumably told that to the FBI today. Got to wonder why he'd risk a false statement charge if that wasn't true.
3)Note that Hunter's two other partners (Gilliar and Walker)did not respond to WSJ news question about who was "the big guy." A 2017 text from Gilliar warns Bobulinski: "don't mention Joe being involved."
4) Bobulinski also presumably telling FBI he met with Joe, and that Joe was at some level aware of the deal. Note also that Biden camp did not provide answer to the WSJ news question about that meeting.
5) So here are the right questions for Joe: a) are you "big guy"? b) While Chinese $$ never materialized, were u at one point--via a Hunter--in line to have an equity share? c) Did u meet with Hunter's partner? d)how does any this comport w/ your claims to not talk biz w/Hunter?
Well such as it is. Using an older iPad & it (of course not me) creates a lot of typos.
Hoping Santa brings me a new one.
You might be right. I was only half listening to Dobbs at that point.
Not those guys. It must have been House Intel Committee.
I wasn’t paying full attention.
Joe Seales says they are making a documentary of RSBN & what they have been doing.
Here we go
Can never get enough.
Another facet: They are all up for re-election! Even if the met yesterday nothing concrete would happen until after the election. In the mean time they can promote the appearance (see we’re doing something “ and push the agenda that the big digital companies and biased, unfair and doing criminal actions. The possibility that blocking etc is NOT criminal gets less daily. (First amendment). Really need a couple of cases headed toward SCOTUS but after the house analysts determine whether they have actually written any laws that have been broken. (We don’t need another Obamacare fiasco because of the ineptness of the legislative branch. They wrote a bad bill but in the legal framework).
Released emails show Fauci signed off on WHO-sponsored statement approving China’s response to COVID
The statement was sent out in late January before the worst of the pandemic.
By Daniel Payne Updated: October 23, 2020 - 6:45pm
FTA
Emails obtained by Judicial Watch and the Daily Caller News Foundation via a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit show that White House coronavirus adviser Anthony Fauci in late January approved of a World Health Organization-sponsored press release supporting China’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The email refers to the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, an independent advisory body created by WHO and the World Bank Group. It specifically notes “consensus for the GPMB to issue a statement supportive of countries’ (especially China) and WHO response efforts, and to call for urgent actions to further strengthen global preparedness and response to this outbreak.”
“Looks fine,” Fauci responded. “Please see my comments in attached document.”
China, which claims to have suppressed the virus within its borders, instituted a severe lockdown of the Wuhan province at the outset of the pandemic, reportedly going so far as to lock citizens in their homes by welding their doors shut.
Trump plays the fracking supercut for this rally.
When he can’t refute what is being said, he says sick it.
Dagan really got to him.
Juan is such a jerk!
Thanks for posting.
Watched the trailer; it seems to have a good refresh on the history of what happened.
Just wish it/the series was out a month ago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.