Posted on 09/26/2020 12:16:49 PM PDT by ransomnote
Thats not Sullivans opinion, Hes being careful. Gleason was necessary for justice, how dare you challenge me.
Powell brought that up twice and Sullivan blew it off
I’m voting for careless.
And Kew thought it should be covered again today. We are the news!
D_J lawyer has nailed Gleeson - Gleeson said that Sullivan needs to spend time investigating FARA violations & D_J lawyer points out they had that opportunity and didnt, that memos + notes from Strzok et. al. note there was nothing there, there was discussion as to whether to do another interview to try and get something, but they (coup plotters) decided not to and begs the question - if these questions that Gleeson says needs to be asked and answered are / were important or true or relevant ... then why didnt the coup plotters ever ask them? And having not asked them why didnt they have a re-interview if they were important? In fact this case is done. In coup world Sullivan is treading water.
D_J lawyer was hinting they have more to drop ... said something like, “what if we are to present more showing this is a complete & total fraud?”
Sullivan now complaining he can’t judge Strok’s bias because his attorney wrote a letter saying he can’t because he hasn’t seen all of the e-mails + text messages etc. “It was very disturbing for me to see that” ... “I need a certification from someone”.
Hey, thats my line! I was sure Id made that one up. Ive been saying that for ever, or at least since this horrible tattoo fad has been around.
Masonic identifier.
So well known that Masons will ignore the “prompt”.
Meaning Gaetz is likely probing for a “tell”.
There is a video of Obama and Morley Safer exchanging Mason handshakes, both obviously comfortable with the others identity (different handshake that the extended finger).
Sullivan had a plan to extend the case when he walked intothe room., and hang the reason on Powell. First was her letter to the DOJ. Before she appeared on the record. Sullivan wants to see any response o reaction to Powells requests of that letter. Totally irrelevant but suffucient for him to extend. Then he recruisal motion, and a week to prepare.
Sullivan question the ethics of Powells letter, totally ignorant. Sullivan questioned Powells assertion of executive privilege only government employees can assert privileges.
Ive appeared before countless honest jusges. Had I accused them of lying in open ourt, Id still be in jail for contempt.
Powell twice accused Sullivan of political bias, again had I done that to a non corrupt judge, my tooth brush would have no bristles.
No less an admission by Sullivan that he will lie snd allow his corrupt bias to be known.
Just extrodinary
Links
https://www.nrcc.org/2020/08/06/tom-malinowski-lobbied-to-protect-sexual-predators/
Mark
Odd thing... the congressman who sponsored the anti-Q bill also lobbied against stiffer penalties for sex offenders.https://t.co/sd3SpVB28X— Praying Medic (@prayingmedic) September 29, 2020
https://freebeacon.com/2020-election/nj-dem-lobbied-against-sex-offender-registry/
Yes, it was. Generally posted about it at 9:55 p.m. last night. And lo and behold, its a QDrop today. No coincidences!
Sullivan is giving Powell a week to submit a motion to recruise, and slammed her saing you could have filed a motion to recruise back in June.
This little weasel is going to run out the clock.
Powell acused Sullivan of lying, in opem court. Sullivam didnt react. Sullivan earlier had stated Flynn refused to cooperate, which never happened.
Gawd such an obvious hose job. Sullivan is flaunting Yes, Im corrupt, and theres not a damn thing you can do about it
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What does “recruise” mean?
As we say here in New Hampshire, "they're wicked friggin stupit"
Tonight will be EPIC. Or cancelled..
God bless his soul and thanks for his service. In the end, we serve our country because it is our duty. May God deal with and forgive those who have sacrificed our children for their own greed and/or power.
Jimmy Carter was difficult to honor; O'zero narrowly saved him from being the worst U.S. president.
Q-4787 embeds drop Q-4657 (deltas: 130; 16 days)
Reading “backwards” Q tells us
(3)we will hear of both improper activity regarding the questions and improper support from comms device. [Check]
(2) then there will be more stronger rumors of questions and mishandling [Underway, possibly with confirmation coming BEFORE the debate?]
(1) Biden camp will devise and excuse to terminate the debate.
That last pique’s my interest in its use of the word “terminate.”
To terminate, one must stop /in/ the already started activity.
Will we see Biden show up and participate in the debate then have a default for terminating the debate?
Illness? (coughing jag)
Mental Lapse? (train of thought interrupted)
Inexcusable Offense? (bringing up Hunter)
The first 2, above, will be Biden taking himself out of the race.
The third would preserve him for a while, provided he storms off appropriately.
My gut tells me, he can’t go 90 minutes and will be looking for the first mention of Hunter to take extreme umbrage and walk off. (Family is “off limits”).
What’s the over/under on a time for an “early debate stop”?
Next post: comms device strategy.
I was not aware. Same when Great Brit interfered in Sudan {'Khartoum'}
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.