Child porn "Cuties"

Whatfinger News ^ | 09-12-2020 | kingtom

[kingtom]

Netflix, you are now complicit.

[kingtom]

why don’t you follow the link and see for yourself?

[kingtom]

it’s kiddie porn and the moozies who will uck fay a sheep will love it ...it’ sick shit

[kingtom]

ROGER THAT!

[combat_boots]

Research CSE’s programs
https://www.comprehensivesexualityeducation.org/how-cse-harms-children/

[catnipman]

Can you point to explicit scenes in which child porn occurs?

https://twitter.com/MaryMargOlohan/status/1303908536553017349

[Republican Wildcat]

This thing is, there are multiple things Netflix has already produced and carried on its platform that are even worse than this - which no one really noticed or cared about. Netflix has been in this business for awhile.

[AppyPappy]

Yes but it is a movie that celebrates a rebellious female child in a sexual way.

[Republican Wildcat]

However, if it is just children trying to hone their skills to become professional dancers later in life through competition

Are you freaking kidding me?

[Vaduz]

Makes one wonder what movies he has in stock.

[230FMJ]

I watched the excerpt at the link. Anyone who can defend “Cuties” for ANY reason should be looked at seriously as a candidate for Pedophile Prosecution. I’m a Father and a Retired LEO, and I wouldn’t be the least bit shy to show that video and a persons defense of it as Prima Facia evidence.

[sunny bonobo]

When 11 year old girls are on the balance beam, do they talk about boy’s penis size? Do they take close up pictures of their vaginas and post them on the internet? Do they spread their legs wide open with a seductive pose on their faces? Does the camera focus close up on their buttocks while they’re twerking? Do they thrust their pelvises erotically simulating intercourse?
I’m sorry, I wouldn’t let you near my children if you think that’s normal.

[I want the USA back]

No need to see it. Tracy Beanz described it and that was more than enough. It’s child porn. Federal crime.

[Cronos]

I saw it and it is the opposite of the way it is marketed.

The film is a denouncement of the sexualization of children.

[2nd amendment mama]

I grew up in the 50's and studied dance. My father would have shot the dance instructor if she ever tried to have us dance like this clip: Clip from the show. Would you let your 11 or 12-year-old daughter/granddaughter "dance" like this? This is definitely child soft porn/exploitation.

[Bratch]

Cuties’ Review: Dull and Indefensible

---

[...]

You can’t judge a movie by its content. It’s not about content. It’s about what the movie has to say about the content.

[...]

Before we get to Cuties, let me go a bit further…

Bully (2001), Kids (1995), L.I.E. (2001), Thirteen (2003). Tough movies. R-rated movies. What you call hard Rs. All about underage kids doing all sorts of terrible stuff. I will and have defended all four. Again, not about the content. About what the movie says about the content. No one, unless they’re already corrupted, walks away from those four movies thinking any of that is okay. All you want to do afterward is take a shower.

That’s why, initially, sight unseen, I defended Cuties. I did not defend Netflix’s appalling ad campaign, which was aimed directly at the naked-guys-in-a-raincoat-named Floyd crowd. For whatever reason, Netflix is big on sexually exploiting children. Barack and Michelle Obama and Susan Rice are getting rich(er) off all those Floyds.

Okay, I didn’t exactly “defend” Cuties. Gave it the benefit of the doubt. For all the reasons mentioned above.

Now I’ve seen it and can’t defend it.

Cuties is soft-core child pornography disguised as art. Nothing less. Nothing more.

Cuties does not tell Naked Floyd to be ashamed of himself. Naked Floyd’s going to love Cuties. That’s a problem. A big problem.

[...]

---

 

[usurper]

Let’s move on from the 1950’s era. And if you think that I am a pedophiliac, think again.

Is that you Mr. Epstein back from the dead?

They should have named it the Lolita Dance Squad.

[sunny bonobo]

You don’t denounce the sexual exploitation of children by sexually exploiting children.But I guess logic is not usedin your world.

[Rainwave]

I watched the movie to see what all the fuss was about. It tried hard to portray the story as a modern comming of age struggle of these girls in the hyper sexualized, cult of personality “Kardashian” type world we now live in. It seemed the message was that this new “acceptance” of child sexuality is to be inevitable with the exception of certain strict conservative cultures. There was even a slight on these cultures as being behind the times and as being “un-enlightened”. The main message came through to me as to them suggesting a new groundbreaking acceptance in our world of prepubescent young girls becoming legitamate sexual beings that are fully knowledgeable of and acceptably free to entice and have sex with those of any age should that be their choice. I thought their “dance” to be on par with and strove to be more tittilating than the “classiest” of Canadian strip bar pole dancing. This was very troubling to me. First California lessening penalties for the LGBTQ when they molest and rape children, now, of course France leading the way, of the push for children to be legitimate sex objects and trending end goals for the perverted populace that is growing exponentially in our society.

[sunny bonobo]

You were sickened by the way they marketed it? The ad campaign is mild compared to what’s in the movie.

[eastforker]

Actually the camera operator does do that when they are on the beam. This movie is a big slap in the face to the hip hop culture and how our youth today is exposed to it continually.The way this movie was marketed is disgusting, that is for sure. But the movie itself was a depiction of what todays youth is exposed to in media and social outlets.What does our youth think when they watch half time show at the superbowl. That it is ok and try and emulate themselves.And you are quite naive if you don’t think kids today don’t talk about sex and body parts.