Posted on 08/20/2020 12:25:25 PM PDT by familyop
McEnany replied..."He's not in the business of 'basket of deplorable' politics. He doesn't talk about QAnon. He doesn't think about it."...McEnany said, "He has not at all looked into who QAnon is," calling it "some group on the internet..."...Until Wednesday, the president had remained silent on the conspiracy -- twice ignoring a question last week about whether he supports QAnon and in 2018 then-White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Trump “condemns and denounces any group that would incite violence against another individual."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Do you run wild?
Appeal to popularity is not evidence. The majority of the population seems to think that the globe is warming due to mankind's activity and the "science is settled" and that anyone who doubts that is a kook and a cultist. Is that proof that are? That's your argument. Good form, OkeyDokey.
Why aren't you on a Democrat forum?
Believe it or not the majority actually is right from time to time. And when it comes to the majority opinion of your q cult you guys are definitely not favored.
Where are all the herds of wild bison? They're DEAD! The rest live on a constrained reservation, OkeyDoker. So much for another fallacy spouted by you.
Thanks for admitting that the majority is wrong far more often than they are right.
Not too knowledgeable about nature are you? There are thousands of herd of various animals that run wild all the time everywhere on earth. Elks, sheep, cattle,deer, zebras, etc.
Give it up. You aren’t smart enough to converse. Bye.
Who is the Judas Goat?
in fact Q wants you to use the ballot box, inform others of corruption and allow the legal system to take care of it. The closest Q gets to violence is asking for patience from those who fallow the Q posts so the legal system can take care of the problems. we are literally told to grab popcorn and watch.
there we go, devolving to ad hominem insults because you’ve run out of factual arguments. . . As you make up claims you cannot support. Such herds are only surviving because they are being protected from poachers. Where are these “thousands” of herds in the USA??? There are a few small re-established herds of wild horses, artificially placed in the wild, but where are there others? Passenger pigeons? Huge flyways of geese? Etc. You can’t point to these vast herds that once existed. They’ve been encroached on by burgeoning humanity, converting herd lands to farms and fencing off migration with barbed wire. YOU are the ignorant one.
Still waiting for the ten examples. . . You then segued into another argument of “all Q followers are looney“ or something similar, because you could not come up with even five. Ho Hum.
C'mon, man! (/Biden impression)
Don't just confine it to America.
It's a world history story.
How does that story usually end for the herd?
Please, enlighten me.
The French revolution? Brexit? League of Nations/UN? The Iran/Iraq war? Iran/Contra? Saudi palace intrigue?
Clue me in, oh wise one.
Tell me this while you're at it...do you believe there was a plan to spy on the Trump campaign and Presidency as well as to oust him via impeachment? Does that interest you?
Would your interest, as well as that of the general public at large, be considered too much public interest in intrigues, plots and schemes?
If so, there goes your "we'll be fine" theory.
How could I forget this one?!
What about Benghazi? That is full of fake conspiracies (blame it on a film), intrigues (was there gun running going on behind the scenes), plots (Arab Spring), schemes (go on national television and lie, lie, lie - Susan Rice).
It's all covered in one issue. We're doomed! (by your reasoning anyway)
I agree that Qanon and “Q“ followers have never been associated with threats of violence.
However, if there is a big take-away from this story, and that comment about violence in particular, it is that President Trump is largely unfamiliar with “Q”.
Hopefully, this will put to rest the constant boasting of “Q” followers that President Trump is one of them, or that he IS “Q”, or that his Presidency is a manifestation of “Q”.
It is pretty obvious from this exchange that the President has nothing to do with “Q”.
It’s clear Trump was backhandedly insulting QAnon. He said he liked that they supported him, he didn’t say he liked or agreed with the substance of it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.